OB Unit 4
OB Unit 4
OB Unit 4
Source: Based on Harvard Business Review, “Comparison of Satisfiers and Dissatisfiers,” An exhibit from One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees? by Frederick
Herzberg, January 2003. Copyright © 2003 by the Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.
Compare the Early Theories of Motivation
Contrasting View of Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction
Compare the Early Theories of Motivation
• Criticisms of Herzberg’s theory:
• Limited because it relies on self-reports.
• Reliability of methodology is questioned.
• No overall measure of satisfaction was utilized.
Compare the Early Theories of Motivation
• McClelland’s Theory of Needs
– The theory focuses on three needs:
Need for achievement (nAch): drive to excel, to
achieve in relation to a set of standards, to strive to
succeed.
Need for power (nPow): need to make others behave
in a way that they would not have behaved otherwise.
Need for affiliation (nAfl): desire for friendly and
close interpersonal relationships.
Compare the Early Theories of Motivation
• McClelland’s theory has had the best support.
– It has less practical effect than the others.
– Because McClelland argued that the three needs
are subconscious—we may rank high on them but
not know it—measuring them is not easy.
– It is more common to find situations in which
managers aware of these motivational drivers
label employees based on observations made
over time.
Contemporary Theories of Motivation
Self-Determination Theory vs. Goal-Setting Theory
• Self-Determination Theory
– People prefer to feel they have control over their actions.
Focus on the beneficial effects of intrinsic motivation and
harmful effects of extrinsic motivation.
Cognitive evaluation theory - When people are paid
for work, it feels less like something they want to do and
more like something they have to do.
– Proposes that in addition to being driven by a need for
autonomy, people seek ways to achieve competence and
positive connections to others.
Self-Determination Theory vs. Goal-Setting Theory
• When extrinsic rewards are used as payoffs for
performance, employees feel they are doing a good job.
– Eliminating extrinsic rewards can also shift an
individual’s perception of why he or she works on a task
from an external to an internal explanation.
• Self-determination theory acknowledges that extrinsic
rewards can improve even intrinsic motivation under
specific circumstances.
Self-Determination Theory vs. Goal-Setting
Theory
• What does self-determination theory suggest for
providing rewards?
• Self-concordance: considers how strongly
people’s reasons for pursuing goals are consistent
with their interests and core values.
Self-Determination Theory vs. Goal-Setting Theory
Source: Based on E. A. Locke and G. P. Latham, “Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task
Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey,” American Psychologist (September 2002): 705–17.
Self-Efficacy, Reinforcement, and Expectancy
Theory
• Implications of self-efficacy theory:
– The best way for a manager to use verbal persuasion
is through the Pygmalion effect.
A form of self-fulfilling prophecy – believing in
something can make it true.
– Training programs often make use of enactive
mastery by having people practice and build their
skills.
Self-Efficacy, Reinforcement, and Expectancy
Theory
• Reinforcement theory: behavior is a function of its
consequences.
– Reinforcement conditions behavior.
– Behavior is environmentally caused.
• Goal setting is a cognitive approach: an individual’s purposes
direct his or her action.
• Operant conditioning theory: people learn to behave to get
something they want or to avoid something they don’t want.
– B.F. Skinner’s behaviorism.
Self-Efficacy, Reinforcement, and Expectancy
Theory
• Social-learning theory: we can learn through both
observation and direct experience.
– Models are central, and four processes determine
their influence on an individual:
Attentional processes
Retention processes
Motor reproduction processes
Reinforcement processes
Self-Efficacy, Reinforcement, and Expectancy
Theory
• Expectancy theory: a tendency to act in a certain way
depends on an expectation that the act will be followed
by a given outcome and on the attractiveness of that
outcome to the individual.
• Three relationships:
– Effort-performance relationship
– Performance-reward relationship
– Rewards-personal goals relationship
Self-Efficacy, Reinforcement, and Expectancy
Theory
Expectancy Theory
Self-Efficacy, Reinforcement, and Expectancy
Theory
• Expectancy theory helps explain why a lot of workers aren’t motivated
and do only the minimum.
• Three questions employees need to answer in the affirmative if their
motivation is to be maximized:
– If I give maximum effort, will it be recognized in my performance
appraisal?
– If I get a good performance appraisal, will it lead to organizational
rewards?
– If I’m rewarded, are the rewards attractive to me?
Forms of Organizational Justice
Equity Theory
Equity
Integrating
Contemporary Theories
of Motivation
Implications for Managers
• Make sure extrinsic rewards for employees are not viewed as
coercive, but instead provide information about competence
and relatedness.
• Either set or inspire your employees to set specific, difficult
goals and provide quality, developmental feedback on their
progress toward those goals.
• Try to align or tie in employee goals to the goals of your
organization.
• Model the types of behaviors you would like to see performed
by your employees.
Implications for Managers
• Expectancy theory offers a powerful explanation of
performance variables such as employee productivity,
absenteeism, and turnover.
• When making decisions regarding resources in your
organization, make sure to consider how the resources
are being distributed (and who’s impacted), the fairness
of the decision, along with whether your actions
demonstrate that you respect those involved.
Organizational Behavior
Copyright © 2019, 2017, 2015, 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
TELECOMMUTING?? NO.
EXTRA MATERNITY LEAVE? YES
• Yahoo! CEO Marissa Mayer – Ban telecommuting practices at Yahoo!!
• Silicon Valley workforce – Google, Intel, Apple, and Oracle – grew by
less than 10 percent.
• Telecommuting increased by 130 percent.
• Critics said it is ant-feminist. Difficulty balance work-life.
• Maternity benefits – 8 weeks of paid leave, mothers addition 8 weeks.
With $ 500 to help with initial child care costs.
• Google 22 weeks with 7 weeks for father.
• Facebook, 4 paid months with $ 4000 in “baby cash”
Learning Objectives
Describe how the job characteristics model motivates by changing the
work environment.
Compare the main ways jobs can be redesigned.
Explain how specific alternative work arrangements can motivate
employees.
Describe how employee involvement measures can motivate employees.
Demonstrate how the different types of variable-pay programs can
increase employee motivation.
Show how flexible benefits turn benefits into motivators.
Identify the motivational benefits of intrinsic rewards.
The Job Characteristics Model
Source: Based on J. L. Pierce, I. Jussila, and A. Cummings, “Psychological Ownership within the Job Design Context: Revision of the Job Characteristics Model,” Journal of
Organizational Behavior 30, no. 4 (2009): 477–96.
• Motivating potential score (MPS)
MPS = Skill variety + Task identity + Task significance/ 3 x
Autonomy x Feedback
The Job Characteristics Model (2 of 2)
• The core dimensions of the job characteristics model (JCM) can
be combined into a single predictive index called the motivating
potential score (MPS).
– Evidence supports the JCM concept that the presence of a set of
job characteristics does generate higher and more satisfying job
performance.
– Studies show that supportive leadership behaviors improved the
job characteristics of R&D professionals.
– Individualistic vs collectivistic culture
Compare the Main Ways Jobs Can Be Redesigned
• Repetitive jobs provide little variety, autonomy, or motivation.
• Job Rotation: Singapore Airlines
– Referred to as cross-training.
– Periodic shifting from one task to another.
– Strengths: reduces boredom, increases motivation, and helps
employees better understand their work contributions.
– Weaknesses: creates disruptions, requires extra time for
supervisors to address questions and training time, and
reduces efficiencies.
Compare the Main Ways Jobs Can Be Redesigned
• Job Enrichment
– Increasing a job’s high-level responsibilities to increase intrinsic
motivation.
Involves adding another layer of responsibility and meaning.
Can be effective at reducing turnover.
• Relational Job Design
– To make jobs more prosocially motivating:
Connect employees with the beneficiaries of their work.
Meet beneficiaries firsthand.
Guidelines for enriching a Job
Establish client
relationships Task significance
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Table 6, from Economic News Release, “American Time Use Survey Summary,” June 24, 2016,
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.t06.htm.
The social and Physical context of work
• Eg: Rahul and Krishna started their profession as teachers.
• More satisfaction comes when intrinsic work tasks are
engaging.
• Isolated from co-workers.
• Job rotations, worker empowerment, and participation.
• Interdependency, social support and Social interactions.
• Work context: Hot, loud, and dangerous work is less
satisfying
Employee Involvement and Employee Motivation
• Employee Involvement: a participative process that uses
employees’ input to increase their commitment to the
organization’s success.
• Research comparison of US and India
• Eg: LIC of India
• Examples of Employee Involvement Programs
– Participative management
– Representative participation
Employee Involvement and Employee Motivation
• Participative management
– Joint decision making.
– Acts as a panacea for poor morale and low productivity.
– Trust and confidence in leaders is essential.
– Studies of the participation-performance have yielded
mixed results.
Employee Involvement and Employee Motivation
• Representative participation
– Workers are represented by a small group of employees
who actually participate in decision making.
– Almost every country in Western Europe requires
representative participation.
– The influence is minimal
– The two most common forms:
Works councils
Board representatives
Variable-Pay Programs and Employee Motivation
• What to Pay:
– Lead, Lag and match.
– Complex process that entails balancing internal equity and
external equity.
– Internal equity – Job evaluation, Compa-ratio.
– External equity – Surveys.
– Some organizations prefer to pay leaders by paying above
market.
– Paying more may net better-qualified and more highly
motivated employees who may stay with the firm longer.
Variable-Pay Programs and Employee Motivation
• How to Pay:
– Variable pay programs:
Piece-rate plans
Merit-based pay
Bonuses
Profit sharing
Employee stock ownership plans
– Earnings therefore fluctuate up and down.
Variable-Pay Programs and Employee Motivation
• Piece-Rate Pay
– A pure piece-rate plan provides no base salary and
pays the employee only for what he or she produces.
– Limitation: not a feasible approach for many jobs.
– The main concern for both individual and team piece-
rate workers is financial risk.
– Manufacturing certain outputs, Eg: Surgeon
Variable-Pay Programs and Employee Motivation
• Merit-Based Pay
– Allows employers to differentiate pay based on performance
appraisal rating.
– Salaried employees
– Creates perceptions of relationships between performance and
rewards.
– Limitations:
Based on annual performance appraisals.
Merit pool fluctuates.
Union resistance.
Variable-Pay Programs and Employee Motivation
• Bonuses
– An annual bonus is a significant component of total
compensation for many jobs.
– Increasingly include lower-ranking employees.
Many companies now routinely reward production
employees with bonuses when profits improve.
– Downside: employees’ pay is more vulnerable to cuts.
Variable-Pay Programs and Employee Motivation
• Profit-Sharing Plans
– Organization-wide programs that distribute compensation based on
some established formula centered around a company’s profitability.
– Appear to have positive effects on employee attitudes at the
organizational level.
Employees have a feeling of psychological ownership.
• Gain–sharing plan
A formula-based group-incentive plan.
Improvement in group productivity.
Manufacturing and Healthcare
Variable-Pay Programs and Employee Motivation