3rd
presentation
How to use Minitab to design
and analyze DOE result
SDE_Dobin
Hong
2022.04.26
Guideline
OFAT & DOE
DOE steps
single-factorial experimental design
full factorial experimental design
• 7 steps of DOE process
• Minitab operation steps
• analysis and suggestion
Partial factorial experimental design
SRAM.COM
OFAT & DOE
OFAT(one factor at a time):
• Chose one factor and vary the level at one
time.
DOE(design of experiment):
• Vary multiple factors in one time
SRAM.COM
DOE noun definition
Factor :
the elements which effect the result of experiment.
ex: time, temperature, pressure
Level:
levels are all the values that the factor can take.
ex: for temperature, the level could be 200°C 、 300°C 、 400°C
Interaction:
an interaction is a term in a statistical model in which the effect of two, or
more, variables is not simply additive.
SRAM.COM
7 steps of DOE
process
1. Problem comprehension and statement
2. Selection of Response (Y)
3. Selection of factors, levels to define
scope
4. Selection of DOE type
5. Experiment implement and data
collection
6. Statistical analysis of data
7. Conclusion and suggestion
SRAM.COM
Exampl
Engineer want to e
stabilize the filling height in a
soda vessel.
He found three factors: carbonation%( 碳酸化 %) 、
operation pressure( 操作壓力 ) and line speed ( 產線速
度)
In order to get confident result, he plan to run
each combination 2 times.
levels for each factor:
carbonation%: 10% 、 12% 、 14%
operation pressure: 25 、 30 psi
line speed: 200 、 250 bpm
SRAM.COM
1. Problem comprehension and statement
How to find a combination at which filling height is closest to
target height?
2. Selection of Response (Y)
The deviation to target height
3. Selection of factors, levels to define
scope
operation
Carbonation% Line speed
Factor pressure
Level 1 10% 25 200
Level 2 12% 30 250
Level 3 14%
SRAM.COM
4. Selection of DOE type
SRAM.COM
SRAM.COM
5. Experiment implement and data
collection
SRAM.COM
System setting: Show P value in normal plot
SRAM.COM
System setting: Show P value in normal plot
SRAM.COM
6-1. Statistical analysis of data
Open file “Minitab0211” ( with response values in file)
SRAM.COM
Edit last dialog
SRAM.COM
6-2. 2nd Statistical analysis of data
SRAM.COM
Residuals
The difference between a measured value and its corresponding
theoretical value.
SRAM.COM
SRAM.COM
7. Conclusion and suggestion
%SS (contribution % of factors)
%SS 碳酸化百分比 = 252.75/336.625=75.1%
%SS 操作壓力 = 45.375/336.625=13.5%
%SS 線速 = 22.042/336.625=6.6%
%SS 碳酸化百分比 * 操作壓力 = 5.25/336.625=1.6%
Conclusion 1: Carbonation% is the most important factor effect filling
height, It need to pay more attention to monitor or control it.
SRAM.COM
SRAM.COM
7-2. Conclusion and suggestion- To find the best
solution
SRAM.COM
Conclusion 2:
The best combination is:
Carbonation: 12 %
Operation pressure: 25 psi
Line speed: 200 bpm
SRAM.COM
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
