Cap Structure
Cap Structure
Leverage
High risk
0 E(EBIT) EBIT
EBITL EBITH
Firm U Firm L
No debt $10,000 of 12% debt
$20,000 in assets $20,000 in
assets
40% tax rate 40% tax rate
Firm U: Unleveraged
Economy
Bad Avg. Good
Prob. 0.25 0.50 0.25
EBIT $2,000 $3,000 $4,000
Interest 0 0 0
EBT $2,000 $3,000 $4,000
Taxes (40%) 800 1,200 1,600
NI $1,200 $1,800 $2,400
Firm L: Leveraged
Economy
Bad Avg. Good
Prob.* 0.25 0.50 0.25
EBIT* $2,000 $3,000 $4,000
Interest 1,200 1,200 1,200
EBT $ 800 $1,800 $2,800
Taxes (40%) 320 720 1,120
NI $ 480 $1,080 $1,680
Risk Measures:
Firm U Firm L
σROE 2.12% 4.24%
CVROE 0.24 0.39
The effect of leverage on
profitability and debt
coverage
For leverage to raise expected ROE, must
have BEP > kd.
Why? If kd > BEP, then the interest
expense will be higher than the operating
income produced by debt-financed
assets, so leverage will depress income.
As debt increases, TIE decreases because
EBIT is unaffected by debt, and interest
expense increases (Int Exp = kdD).
Optimal Capital Structure
That capital structure (mix of debt
and equity) at which P0 is
maximized. Trades off higher
E(ROE) and EPS against higher risk.
The tax-related benefits of leverage
are exactly offset by the debt’s risk-
related costs.
The target capital structure is the
mix of debt and equity with which
the firm intends to raise capital.
Describe the sequence of
events in a
recapitalization.
Campus Deli announces the
recapitalization.
New debt is issued.
Proceeds are used to repurchase
stock.
The number of shares repurchased
is equal to the amount of debt
issued divided by price per share.
Cost of debt at different levels of
debt, after the proposed
recapitalization
EBIT $400,000
TIE 20x
Int Exp $20,000
Determining EPS and TIE at different
levels of debt.
(D = $500,000 and kd = 9%)
$500,000
Sharesrepurchase
d 20,000
$25
( EBIT - kdD )( 1 - T )
EPS
Sharesoutstandin g
($400,000- 0.09($500, 000))(0.6)
80,000- 20,000
$3.55
EBIT $400,000
TIE 8.9x
Int Exp $45,000
Determining EPS and TIE at different
levels of debt.
(D = $750,000 and kd = 11.5%)
$750,000
Sharesrepurchase
d 30,000
$25
( EBIT - kdD )( 1 - T )
EPS
Sharesoutstandin g
($400,000- 0.115($750 ,000))(0.6)
80,000- 30,000
$3.77
EBIT $400,000
TIE 4.6x
Int Exp $86,250
Determining EPS and TIE at different
levels of debt.
(D = $1,000,000 and kd = 14%)
$1,000,000
Sharesrepurchase
d 40,000
$25
( EBIT - kdD )( 1 - T )
EPS
Sharesoutstandin g
($400,000- 0.14($1,00 0,000))(0.
6)
80,000- 40,000
$3.90
EBIT $400,000
TIE 2.9x
Int Exp $140,000
Conclusions
Basic earning power (BEP) is
unaffected by financial leverage.
L has higher expected ROE
because BEP > kd.
L has much wider ROE (and EPS)
swings because of fixed interest
charges. Its higher expected
return is accompanied by higher
risk.
Stock Price, with zero
growth
D1 EPS DPS
P0
ks - g ks ks
βL = βU[ 1 + (1 - T) (D/E)]
βL = 1.0 [ 1 + (0.6)($250/$1,750) ]
βL = 1.0857
Actual
No leverage
D/A
0 D1 D2
Modigliani-Miller Irrelevance
Theory
The graph shows MM’s tax benefit
vs. bankruptcy cost theory.
Logical, but doesn’t tell whole
capital structure story. Main
problem--assumes investors have
same information as managers.
Incorporating signaling
effects
Signaling theory suggests firms
should use less debt than MM
suggest.
This unused debt capacity helps
avoid stock sales which depress
stock price because of signaling
effects.
What are “signaling” effects
in capital structure?
Assume:
Managers have better information
about a firm’s long-run value than
outside investors.
Managers act in the best interests of
current stockholders.
What can managers be
expected to do?
Issue stock if they think stock is
overvalued.
Issue debt if they think stock is
undervalued.
As a result, investors view a
common stock offering as a
negative signal--managers think
stock is overvalued.
Conclusions on Capital
Structure
Need to make calculations as we did,
but should also recognize inputs are
“guesstimates.”
As a result of imprecise numbers,
capital structure decisions have a large
judgmental content.
We end up with capital structures
varying widely among firms, even
similar ones in same industry.