Chapter 3 - Analysis of Financial Statements
Chapter 3 - Analysis of Financial Statements
1
Overview
Ratios facilitate comparison of:
One company over time
One company versus other companies
Ratios are used by:
Lenders to determine creditworthiness
Stockholders to estimate future cash flows and
risk
Managers to identify areas of weakness and
strength
2
Liquidity Ratios
Can the company meet its short-term
obligations using the resources it
currently has on hand?
Current and Quick Ratios:
CR = CA/CL
QR = (CA-Inv)/CL
3
Asset Management Ratios
How efficiently does the firm use its
assets?
How much does the firm have tied up in
assets for each dollar of sales?
ITO, DSO, FATO, TATO
4
Inventory Turnover
Sales
Inv. turnover = Inventories
5
Day Sales Outstanding:
Receivables
DSO = Average sales per day
6
Fixed Assets and Total Assets
Turnover Ratios
7
Debt Management Ratios
Does the company have too much
debt?
Can the company’s earnings meet its
debt servicing requirements?
8
Debt Ratio, TIE, and EBITDA
coverage ratio.
Total liabilities
Debt ratio = Total assets
EBIT
TIE =
Int. expense
9
EBITDA Coverage (EC)
10
Profitability Ratios
What is the company’s rate of return
on:
Sales?
Assets?
11
Profit Margins
Net profit margin (PM):
PM = NI
Sales
Operating profit margin (OM):
EBIT
OM = Sales
12
Profit Margins (Continued)
13
Basic Earning Power (BEP)
EBIT
BEP =
Total assets
14
Return on Assets (ROA)
NI
ROA =
Total assets
15
Return on Equity (ROE)
NI
ROE =
Common Equity
16
Market Value Ratios:
P/E, P/CF, and M/B ratios.
EPS = NI
Shares out.
17
NI + Depr.
CF per share = Shares out.
18
Com. equity
BVPS = Shares out.
19
Interpreting P/E and M/B
P/E: How much investors will pay for $1
of earnings. Higher is better.
M/B: How much paid for $1 of book
value. Higher is better.
P/E and M/B are high if ROE is high,
risk is low.
20
Common Size Balance Sheets:
Divide all items by Total Assets
Assets 2009 2010 2011E Ind.
Cash 0.6% 0.3% 0.4% 0.3%
ST Inv. 3.3% 0.7% 2.0% 0.3%
AR 23.9% 21.9% 25.0% 22.4%
Invent. 48.7% 44.6% 48.8% 41.2%
Total CA 76.5% 67.4% 76.2% 64.1%
Net FA 23.5% 32.6% 23.8% 35.9%
TA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
21
Common Size Income Statement:
Divide all items by Sales
2009 2010 2011E Ind.
Sales 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
COGS 83.4% 85.4% 82.4% 84.5%
Other exp. 9.9% 12.3% 8.7% 4.4%
Depr. 0.6% 2.0% 1.7% 4.0%
EBIT 6.1% 0.3% 7.1% 7.1%
Int. Exp. 1.8% 3.0% 1.1% 1.1%
EBT 4.3% -2.7% 6.0% 5.9%
Taxes 1.7% -1.1% 2.4% 2.4%
NI 2.6% -1.6% 3.6% 3.6%
22
Percentage Change Analysis: %
Change from First Year (2009)
Income St. 2009 2010 2011E
Sales 0.0% 70.0% 105.0%
COGS 0.0% 73.9% 102.5%
Other exp. 0.0% 111.8% 80.3%
Depr. 0.0% 518.8% 534.9%
EBIT 0.0% -91.7% 140.4%
Int. Exp. 0.0% 181.6% 28.0%
EBT 0.0% -208.2% 188.3%
Taxes 0.0% -208.2% 188.3%
NI 0.0% -208.2% 188.3%
23
Explain the Du Pont System
The Du Pont system focuses on:
Expense control (PM)
Asset utilization (TATO)
Debt utilization (EM)
It shows how these factors combine to
determine the ROE.
24
The Du Pont System
( Profit
margin )( TA
turnover )( Equity
multiplier ) = ROE
NI Sales TA = ROE
Sales x TA x CE
25
Potential Problems and
Limitations of Ratio Analysis
Comparison with industry averages is
difficult if the firm operates many
different divisions.
Seasonal factors can distort ratios.
Window dressing techniques can make
statements and ratios look better.
Different accounting and operating
practices can distort comparisons.
26