Auditing - Audit Report and Going Concern
Auditing - Audit Report and Going Concern
Risk and materiality The assessment of risk for the client and risk of fraud
and error and the identification of significant audit
areas. The materiality level for audit planning purposes.
Consequent nature, timing and extent of Details of the focus on audit work on specific areas.
audit procedures Detail on the extent of use of audit software and
possible reliance on internal audit.
Co-ordination, supervision and review of Details the extent of involvement of experts, client
audit work locations and staffing requirements for the audit.
ISA 230
ISA 230 ‘Audit documentation states:
‘The objective of the auditor is to prepare documentation that
provides:
• (a) A sufficient and appropriate record of the basis for the
auditor’s report; and
• (b) Evidence that the audit was planned and performed in
accordance with ISAs (UK and Ireland) and applicable legal
and regulatory requirements.’
reached.
AUDIT DOCUMENTATION
The implications are:
auditors should prepare working papers that are sufficiently
complete and detailed to provide an overall understanding of the
audit process by an experienced auditor
auditors should document in their working papers matters
which are important in supporting their audit opinion, including
records of meetings with clients and third party confirmations.
working papers should record the auditors’ planning, the
nature, timing and extent of the audit procedures performed, and
the conclusions drawn from the audit evidence obtained
AUDIT DOCUMENTATION
The implication are:
working papers should record who performed the work, who
reviewed it and the dates this was carried out
auditors should record in their working papers their reasoning
on all significant matters which require the exercise of
judgement and their conclusions. Where the auditor has
information which is inconsistent with the auditor’s final
conclusions about a particular significant matter the auditor
should document how they dealt with such inconsistency
all information should be either generated by the audit team or
recorded as copies of original documents
DOCUMENTATION
What is unnecessary:
The ISA also explains that it is neither necessary nor practicable for
the auditor to document every matter considered, or professional
judgment made, in an audit, although clearly all significant or
material judgements should be documented.
It is unnecessary for the auditor to document separately (as in a
checklist, for example) compliance with matters for which
compliance is demonstrated by documents included within the audit
file, e.g. the existence of an adequately documented audit plan
demonstrates that the auditor has planned the audit.
It is unnecessary to include copies of documents tested although the
details may be recorded, nor is it necessary to include draft or
preliminary documentation unless these have been subject to audit
testing
EXTENT OF WORKING PAPERS
• Auditors will use standardised forms and checklists to
improve the efficiency of the audit and will also incorporate
schedules and analyses prepared by the business, providing
these have been properly prepared.
• The extent of working papers is a matter of judgement. A
useful way of deciding what is needed is to consider what
information would be needed to provide another auditor who
had no experience of the client with an understanding of the
work performed and the basis of the decisions reached.
PURPOSE OF WORKING PAPERS
• To evidence the planning of the audit and the design of audit
procedures.
• To control the current year’s work. A record of work done is
essential:
• to record the detailed testing, including compliance and substantive
testing and analytical review;
• to record the conclusions drawn from the audit tests performed;
• to record evidence of review at each stage of the audit testing;
• to enable the audit team to be accountable for its work.
• To assist the members of the audit team responsible for
supervision to direct and supervise the audit work and to
evidence the fact of their reviews.
PURPOSE OF WORKING PAPERS
• To enable evidence to be available in the final overall review stage
of an audit so that it can be considered whether the financial
statements show a true and fair view and comply with statutory
requirements.
• Where, in exceptional circumstances, the auditor has to depart
from the requirements of the ISAs a rationale for that departure
and details of the additional testing performed must be recorded.
• Where the auditor has had, exceptionally, to perform audit work
after the audit report has been signed the papers should record a
full explanation of why this has happened and details of the work
performed.
• To enable an experienced auditor to conduct quality control
reviews and inspections or external inspections as required by any
legal or regulatory requirements.
CONTENT OF WORKING PAPERS
Each audit working paper should contain:
A statement of the
responsibility of the entity’s
management and the
responsibility of the audit.
THE AUDIT REPORT MANAGEMENT
RESPONSIBILITY AND AUDITOR RESPONSIBILITY
Unmodified
(unqualified),
Three Modified Opinions:
qualified, Q U A D
adverse or
disclaimer of
opinion
UNQUALIFIED AUDIT OPINION – ALSO CALLED
UNMODIFIED OPINION
Unmodified (unqualified) opinion – The opinion expressed
by the auditor when the auditor concludes that the
financial statements are prepared, in all material respects,
in accordance with the applicable financial reporting
framework.
Most common type of audit report.
Called ‘clean opinion’.
Used for more than 90 per cent of all audit reports.
Other audit reports are referred to as ‘modified opinion
(adverse opinion, disclaimer of opinion and qualified
opinion).
EVALUATION OF THE COMPLIANCE TO THE REPORTING
FRAMEWORK INCLUDE CONSIDERATION OF THESE
QUALITATIVE ASPECTS
• Whether the financial statements adequately disclose the significant
accounting policies selected and they are consistent and appropriate.
• Accounting estimates made by management are reasonable.
• Information presented in the financial statements is relevant, reliable,
comparable and understandable.
• Disclosures to enable the intended users to understand the effect of material
transactions and events on the information conveyed in the financial
statements.
• Terminology used in the financial statements, including the title
of each financial statement, is appropriate.
• Whether the financial statements achieve fair presentation. If they are
prepared in accordance with a fair presentation framework.
AUDITOR’S QUALIFIED OPINION
The auditor will express a qualified opinion when:
•having obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence, he
concludes that misstatements, individually or in the aggregate,
are material, but not pervasive, to the financial statements; or
•the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence on which to base the opinion, but the auditor
concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements
of undetected misstatements,
if any, could be material but not pervasive.
AUDITOR’S ADVERSE OPINION (ISA 705)
The auditor shall express an adverse opinion when the
auditor, having obtained sufficient appropriate audit
evidence, concludes that misstatements, individually
or in the aggregate, are both material and pervasive to
the financial statements.
AUDITOR’S DISCLAIMER OF OPINION (ISA 705)
or interaction of multiple
uncertainties on F/S
BASIS FOR MODIFICATION PARAGRAPH
1. A limitation in scope
2. The auditor’s judgement about the pervasiveness
of the effects or possible effects of the matter
on the financial statements.
The circumstances described in 1 – scope limitation –
could lead to a modified opinion
or a disclaimer of opinion. The circumstances
described in 2 – disagreement with
management – could lead to a modified opinion
or an adverse opinion.
LIMITATION ON SCOPE
•independence of auditor;
•fraud.