Unit 2
Unit 2
• The calculation of ΔG is illustrated where the shaded area represents the integral.
The slope of a G versus P plot at constant temperature is equal to the molar volume.
• For a real fluid, the ideal-gas approximation is valid only at low pressures. The
volume is given by V = ZRT/P;
• For an ideal gas, we may substitute Z = 1
• as a real fluid state approaches zero pressure, Z will approach the ideal gas limit and
dG approaches dGig. Thus, the difference dG – dGig will remain finite, and goes to
zero as P goes to zero. Thus,dG – dG = d(G – G )
ig ig
Fugacity and Fugacity Coefficient
• The fugacity has one advantage over the Gibbs energy in that its application to mixtures is a
straightforward extension of its application to pure fluids.
• the fugacity of an ideal gas equals the pressure and the fugacity of a liquid equals the vapor
pressure under common conditions
• The vapor pressure was the original property used for characterization of phase equilibrium by
experimentalists
• Integrating from low pressure, at constant temperature, we have for the left hand side,
• because (G – Gig) approaches z ero at low pressure. Integrating the right-hand side
• To complete the definition of fugacity, we define the low-pressure limit,
• we may subtract Gig from both sides and divide by RT, giving
Calculation of Fugacity (Gases)
• Equations of State
• Equations of state are the dominant method used in process
simulators because the EOS can be solved rapidly by computer. We
consider two equations of state, the virial equation and the Peng-
Robinson equation. We also consider the generalized compressibility
factor charts as calculated with the Lee-Kesler equation.
• Ideal Gas
• The Virial Equation
• Writing the virial coefficient in reduced temperature and pressure,
The Peng-Robinson Equation
Generalized Charts
Calculation of Fugacity (Liquids)
• The shape of an isotherm below the critical temperature differs significantly from an ideal-gas
isotherm. Such an isotherm is illustrated which begins in the vapor region at low pressure, intersects
the phase boundary where vapor and liquid coexist, and then extends to higher pressure in the liquid
region.
• Point A represents a vapor state,
• point B represents saturated vapor,
• point C represents
• saturated liquid, and
• point D represents a liquid.
Poynting Method
The Poynting method applies between saturation (points B, C) and point D. The integral is
Since liquids are fairly incompressible for Tr < 0.9, the volume is approximately constant, and may be removed from the integral, with the resultant Poynting correction
becoming
• When Tr < 1, the equation of state predicts an isotherm with “humps” in the vapor/liquid region
• the shaded area above line is equal to the shaded area below, and that the pressure where the line
is located represents the saturation condition (vapor pressure)
• In fig (b) the molar Gibbs energy is indeed continuous as the fluid transforms from the vapor to the
liquid. The Gibbs energy first increases according to
based on the vapor volume.
• During the transition from vapor to liquid, the “humps” lead to the triangular region associated
with the name of van derWaals loop.
Calculation of Fugacity (Solids)
• Fugacities of solids are calculated using the Poynting method, with the
exception that the volume in the Poynting correction is the volume of
the solid phase.
• Bubble Temperature
• To solve this equation, it is necessary to iterate on temperature (which changes Pi sat) until
P equals the specified pressure. Then the vapor phase mole fractions are calculated
• Dew Temperature
• To solve this equation, it is necessary to iterate on temperature (which changes Pi sat) until
P equals the specified pressure. Then the liquid phase mole fractions
Multicomponent VLE Raoult’s Law
Calculations
• Extending our equations to multicomponent systems is
straightforward. For a bubble calculation
• For a dew calculation we have
• These equations may be used for bubble- or dew-pressure
calculations without iterations. For bubble- or dew-point
temperatures, iteration is required. A first guess may be obtained
from one of the following formulas:
Concepts for Generalized Phase Equilibria
• Generalization of pure-component principles to multicomponent systems requires
that we consider how the thermodynamic properties change with respect to changes
in the amounts of individual components. For a pure fluid, the natural properties
were simply a function of two state variables. In multicomponent mixtures, these
energies and the entropy also depend on composition.
• At constant moles and composition of material, the mixture must follow the same
constraints as a pure fluid. That is, the state is dependent on only two state variables
if we keep the composition constant.
• ⇒ (∂G/∂P)T,n = V and (∂G/∂T)P,n = – S;
• These complicated-looking derivatives are really fundamental properties; therefore,
we can rewrite
chemical potential
• The quantity (∂G/∂ni)P, T, nj ≠ i tells us how the total Gibbs energy of
the mixture changes with an infinitesimal change in the number of
moles of species i, when the number of moles of all other species
fixed, and at constant P and T.
• The quantity (∂G/∂ni)P, T, nj ≠ i called the chemical potential,
Partial Molar Properties
• For any extensive thermodynamic property M, we may write
• .Note that T, P, and nj ≠ i are always held constant for a partial molar
property. The overbar indicates a partial molar quantity, that is, for
total volume V, the quantity (∂V/∂ni)T,P,nj≠i is called the partial molar
volume and given the symbol .
Equilibrium Criteria
• For equilibrium at constant T and P, the Gibbs energy is minimized and
mathematically the minimum means dG = 0 at equilibrium.
• But if component 1 leaves the liquid phase then it must enter the vapor phase
(and similarly for component 2) because the overall system is closed.
Chemical Potential of a Pure Fluid
• For a pure fluid, there is only one component, so dni = dn, and since
G(T,P) is intensive, then n(∂G/∂n)T,P = 0. Also (∂n/∂ni)T,P = 1
• The chemical potential of a pure fluid is simply the molar Gibbs
energy.
Component Fugacity
• When phases are in equilibrium, the component moves (“escapes”) from the
phase where it has the higher fugacity to the phase where it has the lower
fugacity until the fugacities are equal in both phases
• At constant T, we defined RTdlnf ≡ dG which can be generalized to define the
fugacity of a component in a mixtures as
• The reason is that changes in entropy are related to the change in accessible volume.
• Even though a significant volume is occupied by the molecules themselves in a dense
liquid, the void space in one liquid is very similar to the void space in another liquid if the
molecules are similar in size and polarity.
• That means that the accessible volume for each component doubles when we mix equal
parts of two equal-sized components. That is essentially the same situation that we had
when mixing ideal gases. The partial molar entropy of mixing is
• The general relationship for ΔGmix gives a relationship for fugacity. We
can extend our definition of the enthalpy of mixing to the Gibbs
energy of mixing,
• Thus, comparing
• By comparing the relations in the logarithms, we obtain the Lewis-
Randall rule for ideal solutions:
The Ideal Solution Approximation and
Raoult’s
Law
• By our equilibrium constraint,
• By our ideal solution approximation in both phases, the equilibrium
criteria becomes
• The fugacity of the pure vapor
• The fugacity of the liquid comes
• Combining
• Writing in terms of the Ki ratio,
• at reasonably low pressures,
• resulting in Raoult’s Law,
Bubble Pressure
where no iterations are required because temperature, and therefore vapor pressures, are known. Once the
bubble pressure is found, the value can be
Dew Pressure
Bubble Temperature
To solve this equation, it is necessary to iterate on temperature (which changes Pi sat) until P equals the
specified pressure. Then the liquid phase mole fractions are calculated using
Flash Drum
• Flash drums are frequently used in chemical processes. For an isothermal drum, the
temperature and pressure of the drum are known. Consider that a feed stream is liquid
which becomes partially vaporized after entering the drum
• The name of the flash procedure implies that it is applicable only for flashing liquids, but in
fact, the procedure is also valid for vapor entering a partial condenser or for any number of
incoming vapor and/or liquid streams with overall compositions specified by {zi} with
overall flow rate F.
• To apply the procedure, the overall composition of the components, zi, total feed flow rate,
F, and outlet T and P just need to be known before the procedure is started. Though the
method is introduced using flowing streams, flow is not required for a flash calculation; the
calculation can be performed for any overall composition constrained at a particular
temperature and pressure even within a closed system.
• Also, the inlet stream temperature does not need to match the outlet temperature; the two
outlet streams are at the specified temperature.
• If z is the feed composition and V/F is the liquid-to-feed ratio, then L/F
= 1 – V/F, and the component balance is
• zi = xi(L/F) + yi(V/F).
• Substituting for L/F from the overall balance, and using yi = xiKi, the
component balance becomes zi = xi[(1 –V/F) + Ki(V/F)], which can be
solved for xi: