Eko 13
Eko 13
Eko 13
perfect competition
monopoly
oligopoly
monopolistic competition
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
TYPES OF MARKET STRUCTURE
Are products differentiated?
No Yes
Not applicable
One Monopoly
How many
producers are Few Oligopoly
there?
Perfect Monopolistic
Many competition competition
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
THE MEANING OF MONOPOLY
Price
S
PM M
2. … and raises
price. C
PC
QM QC Quantity
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
BARRIERS TO ENTRY
Barriers generate profit for the monopolist in the
short run and long run.
Barriers can take the form of:
control of natural resources or inputs.
increasing returns to scale.
technological superiority.
government-made barriers, including patents and
copyrights.
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
1. CONTROL OF A SCARCE RESOURCE OR
INPUT
If De Beers owned nearly all of the diamond
mines in the world, it would have a monopoly in
diamond production.
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
ECONOMICS IN ACTION
NEWLY EMERGING MARKETS: A DIAMOND
MONOPOLIST’S BEST FRIEND
DeBeers (the original diamond monopoly) has, since 1990
Lost control of many mines
Agreed to stop monopolizing and fixing prices in the US
diamond market (2013)
Been faced with high-quality synthetic diamond alternatives
BUT… demand is growing in China and India… and mines
are being depleted
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
2. INCREASING RETURNS TO SCALE
Price,
cost
D
Quantity
Relevant output range
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
3. TECHNOLOGICAL SUPERIORITY
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
4. NETWORK EXTERNALITY
Network externality: the value of a good or service
to an individual increasing as more others use the
same good or service.
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
5. GOVERNMENT-CREATED BARRIER
A patent gives an inventor a
temporary monopoly in the
use or sale of an invention.
Market DC
price
DM
Quantity Quantity
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
HOW A MONOPOLIST MAXIMIZES PROFIT
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
LEARN BY DOING: PRACTICE QUESTION
Back to Ta
To Next ble of cont
Active Learning ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
A MONOPOLIST’S DEMAND, TOTAL REVENUE,
AND MARGINAL REVENUE CURVES
(a) Demand and marginal revenue
Price, cost, marginal
revenue of demand
$1,000
A Quantity effect =
550 B +$500
500
Price effect = –
$450
50 C D
0 9 10 20
–200 Marginal revenue =
–400 $50 MR
Quantity of diamonds
(b) Total Revenue
$5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
TR Back to Ta
ble of cont
0 10 20 ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T Quantity
H P Uof B
diamonds
L I S H E R S
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION FOR A MONOPOLY
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
THE MONOPOLIST’S PROFIT-
MAXIMIZING OUTPUT AND PRICE
Price, cost,
marginal revenue
of demand
$1,000 Monopolist’s
optimal point
B
PM 600
Perfectly competitive
Monopoly industry’s optimal point
profit
PC 200 MC = ATC
A C
D
0
8 10 16 20
Quantity of diamonds
–200 QM QC
MR
–400
The price De Beers can charge per diamond is found by going to the point on the
demand curve directly above point A, (point B here)—$600 per diamond. It makes a
profit of $400 × 8 = $3,200. Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
THE MONOPOLIST’S PROFIT
As long as the monopoly has strong barriers to entry,
profit will stay.
Price, cost,
marginal
revenue
MC
ATC
B
PM
Monopoly
profit
A
D
ATCM
C
MR
QM Quantity Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
LEARN BY DOING: PRACTICE QUESTION
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
MONOPOLY CAUSES INEFFICIENCY
(a) Total surplus with perfect competition (b) Total surplus with monopoly
Price, Price, cost,
cost Consumer surplus with marginal Consumer surplus with
perfect competition revenue monopoly
PM Profit
Deadweight loss
PC MC = ATC MC = ATC
D D
MR
QC Quantity QM Quantity
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
MONOPOLY AND PUBLIC POLICY
When a monopoly raises prices and lowers Q,
consumer surplus falls and deadweight loss is
created.
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
DEALING WITH NATURAL MONOPOLY
Natural monopolies are a different story: They
bring lower costs…
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
DEALING WITH NATURAL MONOPOLY
What can public policy do about this?
Public (government) ownership:
But publicly owned companies are often poorly
run.
Price regulation:
A price ceiling imposed on a monopolist does not
create shortages if it is not set too low.
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
UNREGULATED AND REGULATED
NATURAL MONOPOLY
(a) Total surplus with an unregulated (b) Total surplus with a regulated
natural monopolist natural monopolist
Profit
PM
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
PRICE DISCRIMINATION AND PROFIT
MAXIMIZATION
Recall the profit-maximizing rule for firms with
monopoly power:
Produce the Q at which MR = MC.
Based on that Q, charge as much as the market will
bear.
But what if you sell to more than one market, each
with its own demand curve?
E.g., senior citizens and young people, business
travelers and leisure travelers.
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
PRICE DISCRIMINATION
55+ Students
DISCOUNT Get
10% Off!
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
TWO TYPES OF AIRLINE CUSTOMERS
Price, cost of
ticket Profit from sales to business If your consumers have
travelers
low price elasticity,
$550 charge them more!
150
125 MC
S
D
0 2,000 4,000
Quantity of tickets
Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
LEARN BY DOING: PRACTICE QUESTION
Who probably has more elastic demand for a Hertz rental
car? Person A reserves a car online weeks before a trip;
person B walks up to a Hertz counter after he walks off an
airplane after a four-hour flight? Who probably gets
charged more?
a) Person B a more elastic demand and will be charged
less.
b) Person B has a more elastic demand and will be charged
more.
c) Person A has a more elastic demand and will be charged
more.
d) Person A has a more elastic demand and will be charged
less.
Back to Ta
To Next ble of cont
Active Learning ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
PRICE DISCRIMINATION INCREASES SALES
AND PROFITS
(a) Discrimination with two prices (b) Discrimination with three prices
Price, Price,
cost cost
Profit with
two prices Profit with
Phigh
three prices
Phigh
Pmedium
Plow
Plow
MC MC
D D
Quantity Quantity
Sales to Sales to Sales to Sales to Sales to
consumers consumers consumers consumers consumers
with a high with a low with a high with a with a low
willingness to willingness willingness to medium willingness to
pay to pay pay willingness pay
to pay Back to Ta
ble of cont
ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
PRICE DISCRIMINATION
There is no deadweight loss, because all mutually beneficial
transactions are exploited.
There is zero consumer surplus: The entire surplus is captured by
the monopolist in the form of profit.
Price, cost (c) Perfect price discrimination
MC
Back to Ta
ble of cont
Quantity ents
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
PRICE DISCRIMINATION
Common techniques for price discrimination:
Advance purchase restrictions
Volume discounts
Two-part tariffs
C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 1 5 W O R T H P U B L I S H E R S
LEARN BY DOING: BUSINESS CASE
Amazon and Hachette Go to War
May 2014: in a dispute over the increase in
Amazon’s fees to Hachette publishers (30% to
50%) Amazon slowed delivery of Hachette books,
removed ordering options and suggested
alternatives to customers.