Chapter Four
Chapter Four
Chapter Four
Performance
Appraisal/Management
1
Performance Appraisal; Definition
• Performance appraisal system has been defined
in many ways. The easiest way to understand
the meaning of performance appraisal is as
follows:
• It is the systematic assessment of an individual
with respect to his or her performance on the
job and his or her potential for development in
that job.
• Thus, performance appraisal is a systematic and
objective way of evaluating the relative worth or
ability of an employee in performing his job. 2
Definition…..
• According to Flippo, a prominent personality in
the field of Human resources, “performance
appraisal is the systematic, periodic and an
impartial rating of an employee’s excellence in the
matters pertaining to his present job and his
potential for a better job.”
• Thus performance appraisal is a formal
programme in an organization which is concerned
with not only the contributions of the members
who form part of the organization, but also aims
at spotting the potential of the people.”
3
Performance Appraisal Vs. Performance
Management
• The terms 'performance management' and 'performance
appraisal' are sometimes used synonymously, but they are
different.
• Performance management- is a comprehensive,
continuous and flexible approach to the management of
organizations, teams and individuals which involves the
maximum amount of dialogue between those concerned.
• Performance appraisal- is a more limited approach which
involves managers making top-down assessments and
rating the performance of their subordinates at an annual
performance appraisal meeting.
4
Comparison Chart
Performance appraisal Performance management
Top-down assessment Joint process through dialogue
Annual appraisal meeting Continuous review with one or
more formal reviews
Use of ratings Ratings less common
Monolithic system Flexible process
Focus on quantified objectives Focus on values and behaviors as
well as objectives
Often linked to pay Less likely to be directly linked to
pay
Bureaucratic - complex Documentation kept to a minimum
paperwork
Owned by the HR department Owned by line managers
5
Purpose of Performance Appraisal
• Personal Attention: Gives employee to draw personal concern
from supervisor and talk about their own strengths and
weaknesses.
• Feedback: Employees on a regular basis get feedback of their
performances.
• Career Path: It allows employees and supervisors to converse
goals that must be met to grow within the company.
• Employee Accountability: Employees are acquainted that their
evaluation will take place on a regular basis and therefore they
are accountable for their job performance.
• Communicate Divisional and Company Goals: It not only
communicates employees’ individual goals but provides an
opportunity for managers to explain organizational goals and in
the manner in which employees can contribute in the
achievement of those goals. 6
Performance Appraisal Steps
8
……..Steps
3. Measuring of the Actual Performances:
• The four important sources frequently used by
managers are personal observation, statistical
reports, oral reports, and written reports.
• However, combination of all these resources
gives more reliable information.
• The selection of the incorrect criteria can result
in serious consequences.
• What we measure gives an idea about what
people in an organization will attempt to
achieve. 9
……..Steps
4. Comparing Actual Performance with Standards:
• In this step of performance appraisal the actual
performance is compared with the expected or
desired standard set.
• A comparison between actual or desired
standard may disclose the deviation between
standard performance and actual performance
and will allow the evaluator to carry on with the
discussion of the appraisal with the concerned
employees.
10
……..Steps
5. Discussion with the Concerned Employee:
• In this step performance of the employee is
communicated and discussed.
• It gives an idea to the employee regarding their
strengths and weaknesses.
• The impact of this discussion may be positive or
negative.
• The impression that subordinates receive from
their assessment has a very strong impact on
their self esteem and, is very important, for their
future performances. 11
……..Steps
6. Initiate Corrective Action:
• It follows a course of progressive discipline that
will use increasingly serious actions if there is no
sufficient improvement or if there is repeated
failure to correct unacceptable conduct or work
performance.
• The purpose of corrective action is to correct
and resolve employee poor performance.
• Prior to taking any corrective action, managers
and supervisors are required to consult with
Employee and Labor Relations. 12
Problems Associated With PA
1. Biasness in rating employee: Biasness of rater may
include:
A. Halo Effect: It is the propensity of the raters to rate on
the basis of one trait or behavioral consideration in
rating all other traits or behavioral considerations. One
way of minimizing the halo effect is appraising all the
employees by one trait before going to rate on the basis
of another trait.
B. The Central Tendency Error: The rater tries to rate each
and every person on the middle point of the rating scale
and tries not to rate the people on both ends of the scale
that is rating too high or too low. They want to be on the
safer side as they are answerable to the management.
13
Problems …. Cont’d
C. The Leniency and Strictness Biases: It exists when
some raters have a tendency to be generous in their
rating by assigning higher rates constantly.
D. Personal prejudice: If the raters do not like any
employee or any group, in such circumstances he may
rate him on the lower side of the scale, the very
purpose of rating is distorted which might affect the
career of employees also.
E. The Recent Effect: The raters usually retain
information about the recent actions of the employee
at the time of rating and rate on the basis of recent
action taken place which may be favorable or
unfavorable at that point of time. 14
Problems……
19
Performance Appraisals Methods
A. Traditional Methods
1. Ranking Method: It is the oldest and simplest method
of performance appraisal in which employees’ are ranked
on certain criteria such as trait or characteristic.
• The employee is ranked from highest to lowest or
from worst to best in an organization.
• Rating scales offer the advantages of flexibility
comparatively easy use and low cost.
• Thus, the greatest limitation of this method is that
differences in ranks do not indicate how much an
employee of rank 1 is better than the employee whose
rank is last. 20
Traditional Methods ….
3. Grading Method:
• In this method, certain categories are defined well in
advance and employees are put in particular category
depending on their traits and characteristics.
• Such categories may be defined as outstanding, good,
average, poor, very poor, or may be in terms of alphabet
like A, B, C, D, etc. where
• A may indicate the best and D indicating the worst.
• This type of grading method is applied during Semester
pattern of examinations.
• One of the major limitations of this method is that the
rater may rate many employees on the better side of their
performance. 22
Traditional Methods ….
4. Forced Distribution Method:
• The fundamental assumption in this method is that
employees’ performance level conforms to a normal
statistical distribution.
• Example, 10 per cent employees may be rated as
excellent, 40 per cent as above average, 20 per cent
as average, 10 per cent below average, and 20 per
cent as poor.
• This method was evolved to abolish the trend of
rating most of the employees at a higher end of the
scale.
• It eliminates or minimizes the favoritism of rating23
Traditional Methods ….
5. Forced-choice Method:
• It contains a sequence of question in a statement form
with which the rater checks how effectively the statement
describes each individual being evaluated in the
organization.
• The most common method of forced choice contains two
statements both of which may be positive or negative.
• It may be both the statement describes the characteristics
of an employee, but the rater is forced to tick only one.
• Example, a rater may be given the following two
statements:
(i) The employee is very sincere.
(ii) Employee gives clear and fast instructions to 24his
Traditional Methods ….
6. Check-list Method:
• It consist of series of questions which is related to the
appraise.
• Such questions are prepared in a manner that reflects
the behavior of the concerned appraise. Every
question has two alternatives, yes or no, as given
below:
Example:
– Is he/she respected by his/her subordinates? Yes/No
– Does her behavior remain same for everyone in the
organization? Yes/No
• The concerned rater/evaluator has to tick appropriate
answers relevant to the appraises. 25
Traditional Methods ….
7. Critical Incidents Method:
• In this method, only the case of sudden trouble
and behavior associated with these incidents or
trouble are taken for evaluation.
• Its strong side is it focuses on behaviors and, thus,
judge’s performance rather than personalities.
• Its drawbacks are that too frequently they need to
write down the critical incidents which is very
time consuming and burdensome for evaluators,
i.e., managers.
• Generally, negative incidents are more noticeable
than positives. 26
Traditional Methods ….
1. Integrated Assessment-
• Integrated computerized human resources systems
allow department managers to ensure each employee
has met every training requirement through a variety of
assessment methods.
• Multiple assessment methods allow managers to gain a
more complete understanding of an employee's
performance.
• Assessment methods can include oral or written
examinations, observation of employees during job
performance and the results from employee training
programs. 38
Emerging Trends….
4. In-the-Moment Feedback-
• Along with regular meetings, new performance
management trends are also advocating that
managers and colleagues give feedback in a more
timely way.
• This process has been shown to be more effective
than once a year feedback sessions.
• Example; General Electric have got on board with
this approach and now use a feedback app where
managers and colleagues can record feedback
online at any time. 41
Emerging Trends….
5. De-Coupling Reward
• Performance management experts recommend
running pay reviews and performance reviews
separately.
• Having pay directly tied to performance has been
shown to have a negative impact on both staff
motivation and performance.
• As well as performance, pay reviews should be
taking into account other factors including market
rate, increases in responsibility, and skills and
knowledge. 42
Emerging Trends….
46
Emerging Trends….