100% found this document useful (17 votes)
5K views

Oracle Database Worst Practices

This document provides advice on several "worst practices" that developers and DBAs should avoid, along with counterarguments for why those practices are not advisable. It discusses never questioning authority, not using bind variables, not testing code or designs, overusing the varchar2 datatype, and committing transactions too frequently without regard for performance impacts. The overall message is that these types of practices can lead to insecure, unperformant, poorly designed, and buggy systems.

Uploaded by

imsaar
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (17 votes)
5K views

Oracle Database Worst Practices

This document provides advice on several "worst practices" that developers and DBAs should avoid, along with counterarguments for why those practices are not advisable. It discusses never questioning authority, not using bind variables, not testing code or designs, overusing the varchar2 datatype, and committing transactions too frequently without regard for performance impacts. The overall message is that these types of practices can lead to insecure, unperformant, poorly designed, and buggy systems.

Uploaded by

imsaar
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 55

Worst Practices

For Developers and


DBAs Alike
Who am I

• Been with Oracle for over


13 years
• User of Oracle for over 18
years
• The “Tom” behind AskTom
in Oracle Magazine
www.oracle.com/oramag
• Expert Oracle: Database
Architecture
• Effective Oracle by Design
• Beginning Oracle
• Expert One on One Oracle
You Should Probably
Never Question
Authority
Never
Not Ever
(it bothers them when you do)
“Never Question Authority.”
• Experts are always right
• You know the information is accurate
when the author clearly states:
– It is my opinion...
– I claim...
– I think...
– I feel…
– I KNOW…
• Nothing need be backed up with
evidence
• Things never change
• Counter Cases do not prove anything
• If it is written down, it must be true
You Probably Do Not
Need to Use Bind
Variables
It is so much easier to code without them!

query = query =
‘select * ‘select *
from t from t
where x = ? where x = ‘||x||’
And y = ?’ And y = ‘||y

Prepare it Execute it
Bind x
Bind y
Execute it
Close it

Too much code! Look at how efficient I am!


And very secure too!
Enter Username: tom’ or 1=1 –
Enter Password: i_dont_know’ or 1=1 –

Query =
“Select count(*) “ +
“ from user_pw “ +
“ where uname = ‘” + uname + “’” +
“ and pword = ‘” + pword + “’”

Select count(*)
From user_pw
Where uname = ‘tom’ or 1=1 – ‘
And pword ‘i_dont_know’ or 1=1 – ‘
Performance isn’t a concern
• It is not a problem that a large percent of my
program runtime will be spent parsing. That is ok!
SQL> set timing on
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1 .. 100000
3 loop
4 execute immediate
5 'insert into t (x,y)
6 values ( ' || i ||
7 ', ''x'' )';
8 end loop;
9 end;
10 /

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.


Elapsed: 00:01:33.85
Performance isn’t a concern
• It is not a problem that a large percent of my
program runtime will be spent parsing. That is ok!
SQL> set timing on
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1 .. 100000
3 loop
4 execute immediate
5 'insert into t (x,y)
6 values ( :i, ''x'' )'
7 using i;
8 end loop;
9 end;
10 /

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.


Elapsed: 00:00:04.69
Performance isn’t a concern
• It is not a problem that a large percent of my
program runtime will be spent parsing. That is ok!

• That 95% of my runtime was spent parsing SQL in


a single user test is perfectly OK!
And I’m sure memory utilization is OK
SQL> select case when instr( sql_text, ':' ) > 0
2 then 'bound'
3 else 'not bound'
4 end what, count(*), sum(sharable_mem) mem
5 from v$sql
6 where sql_text like 'insert into t (x,y) values (%'
7 group by case when instr( sql_text, ':' ) > 0
8 then 'bound'
9 else 'not bound'
10 end;

WHAT COUNT(*) MEM


---------- ---------- ------------
not bound 6640 56,778,665
bound 1 8,548

SQL> show parameter shared_pool_size

NAME TYPE VALUE


------------------------------------ ----------- --------------
shared_pool_size big integer 152M
And it’ll absolutely scale up!

• Oracle is the most scalable database in the world,


it’ll take care of it.

Run1 latches total versus runs…


Run1 Run2 Diff Pct
13,349,321 548,684 -12,800,637 2,432.97%
Probably
You don’t want to
expose end users to
errors
When others then null;

• End users would never want to know there was a


problem
• Even if the “end user” is really another module
calling you
• Just log it – don’t raise it
Begin

Exception
When others Then
log_error( …);
End;
Probably
The More Generic
You Can Make
Something, The
Better It Is.
Or…
Probably
You Do Not Need to
Actually Design
Anything
Quickly Answer:

• How many tables do you really need?


Quickly Answer:

• How many tables do you really need?


• FOUR at most!
LINKS
*object_id1
OBJECT *object_id2
*object_id …
name
owner ATTRIBUTES
created *attribute_id
… attribute_name
OBJ_ATTR_VALUES attribute_type
*object_id …
*attribute_id
attribute_name
attribute_type

Quickly Answer:

• How many tables do you really need?


• But of course ONE is best!
• And you are industry standard as well!

Create table Object


( object_id number primary key,
data xmltype );
Quickly Answer:

• How many tables do you really need?


• Either ONE or FOUR, not any more…
• You’ll never have to put up with asking the DBA for
anything again!
• End users will never want to actually use this data
except from your application!
• Performance – it should be OK, if not the DBA will
tune the database
• Or we’ll just get a new database if the one we are
using is not fast.
Probably
You want as many
instances per server
as possible
Many Instances

• It’ll be easier to tune of course – each database


can be it’s own unique “thing”
– Multiple dbwr’s would never contend with each other
– Of course there is some magic global view that will
point out areas of contention for us
• Everyone will have their “own” memory
– There won’t be any duplication or increased memory
usage due to this
• A runaway process on one instance won’t be my
problem
Probably
You should reinvent
as many database
features as possible
Reinvent the Wheel

• Writing Code is fun


– Using built in functionality will not demonstrate your
technical capabilities to your manager!
• The builtin stuff only solves 90+% of your extremely
unique, sophisticated, 22nd century needs after all
– It is not good enough
• Besides, you would not want to become dependent
on the vendor
– Much better to be dependent on you after all!
• It must cost less, doesn’t it?
Probably
You Do Not Need To
Test
Testing would be such a waste of time

• It might not break


• So why spend the time trying to make it break
• It probably won’t have any scalability issues
• If you test at all, a single user test on your PC does
as well as a fully loaded test on a server
• If you test at all part 2; testing on an empty
database is just as good as testing on a full one.
• Just do the upgrade, it’ll probably work
• Besides, if I test – they’ll expect it works and if it
doesn’t then I’ll be in trouble
Probably
You Should Only Use
The Varchar
Datatype
Varchar2

• It is so much easier after all


• It would never confuse the optimizer
ops$tkyte%ORA10GR2> create table t ( str_date, date_date )
2 as
3 select to_char( dt+rownum,'yyyymmdd' ),
4 dt+rownum
5 from (select to_date('01-jan-1995','dd-mon-yyyy') dt
6 from all_objects)
7 /

ops$tkyte%ORA10GR2> create index t_str_date_idx on t(str_date);


ops$tkyte%ORA10GR2> create index t_date_date_idx on t(date_date);
ops$tkyte%ORA10GR2> begin
2 dbms_stats.gather_table_stats
3 ( user, 'T',
4 method_opt=> 'for all indexed columns',
5 cascade=> true );
6 end;
7 /
Varchar2

• It is so much easier after all


• It would never confuse the optimizer
SQL> select * from t where str_date between '20001231' and '20010101';
--------------------------------------------------------
| Operation | Name | Rows |
--------------------------------------------------------
| SELECT STATEMENT | | 300 |
| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 300 |
| INDEX RANGE SCAN | T_STR_DATE_IDX | 300 |
--------------------------------------------------------

SQL> select * from t where date_date between to_date('20001231','yyyymmdd')


2 and to_date('20010101','yyyymmdd');
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 17 |
| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 1 | 17 |
| INDEX RANGE SCAN | T_DATE_DATE_IDX | 1 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Varchar2

• Datatypes are overrated.


– They are just fancy integrity constraints after all
– They won’t affect client memory usage at all
– We’ll only put numbers in that string, it’ll be just OK
Probably
You Should Commit
Frequently
Commit Frequently

• Auto Commit is best


– If I didn’t mean for something to be permanent I
wouldn’t have done it after all!
• Definitely commit frequently to save resources and
go faster
– It won’t generate more redo would it?
– It won’t generate more total undo would it?
– Log_file_sync (the wait event observed during commit)
is something the DBA will tune away for us won’t they?
Commit Frequently

• My code won’t fail:


For x in (select * from t1)
Loop
insert into t2 values ..;
cnt := cnt + 1;
if (mod(cnt,100)=0)
then
commit;
end if;
End loop;
• So we don’t need to make it restartable or anything
Probably
You Should Be
Database
Independent
The Promise

• Write Once
– For each database
– They are different
• Deploy Everywhere on anything
– Deploy on specific dot releases
– Of specific databases
– On certain platforms
– (it is a support issue)
• Less Work overall
– More work overall
The Reality

• Write Once
– For each database
– They are different
• Deploy Everywhere on anything
– Deploy on specific dot releases
– Of specific databases
– On certain platforms
– (it is a support issue)
• Less Work overall
– More work overall
The Reality

• Write Once
– For each database
– They are different
• Deploy Everywhere on anything
– Deploy on specific dot releases
– Of specific databases
– On certain platforms
– (it is a support issue)
• Less Work overall
– More work overall
The Reality

• Write Once
– For each database
– They are different
• Deploy Everywhere on anything
– Deploy on specific dot releases
– Of specific databases
– On certain platforms
– (it is a support issue)
• Less Work overall
– More work overall
Probably
You Do Not Need
Configuration
Management Of Any
Sort
We probably do not need CM

• Database code isn’t really code after all


– It is a bunch of scripts
– Scripts are not code really, they are something
less than code
– No need to keep track of the
• Grants, Creates, Alters and so on…
– Besides, we can probably just get it from the
data dictionary
– Because the scratch test database we develop
on is maintained just like a production instance
is!
We probably do not need CM

• “Diffing” databases to see what’s different


schema wise to do application updates
– Is completely acceptable
– Very professional
– Makes it easier to document
– Leads to much better designs
– You don’t really need to know what is changing
between version 1 and 2
Probably
You Do Not Need To
Design To Be
Scalable
If you just whip things together, they tend to work

Initial design Revised design Result


Scalability

• Scalability just happens


• Oracle is very scalable
– Therefore, so shall ye be scalable
• It is a shared pool – we all just share it together
– Contention free
• This is really why you probably do not need to test
• Besides, you can just add more
– CPU
– Memory
– Disk
Probably
You do not need to
design to be secure
Security

• Oracle is very secure


• Therefore, we don’t need to be, it just happens
• Besides, it is not as important as having pretty
screens after all.
• And if we add it later,
– I’m sure it’ll be non-intrusive
– And very performant
– And easy to do
DBAs And
Developers Are Just
Different, So Get
Over It
DBA vs Developer vs DBA
The Job of the DBA is…

• Priority #1 is to protect the database from the


developers
• Outlaw features, they might be mis-used
– Views, had a bad experience with a view once…
– Stored procedures, they just use CPU
– Any feature added after version 6
– No feature can be used until it is at least 5 versions old
– software is just like fine wine
The Job of the DBA is…

• It is not your job to educate


• Just say no. You need not explain why, you
are the DBA after all.
• These are perfectly valid reasons to avoid
using a database feature:
– “I heard it was slow”
– “I’ve heard it is buggy”
Developers

• It is true, the DBA is not there to work with you


• Try to find ways to avoid having to work with them, such as..
– Don’t ask any questions
– Do as much as you can outside of the database
• Do not join, you can write code to do that
• Do not use database features, you can write code to do that
• Do not use integrity constraints in the database, you can
write code to do that
• Try to be as generic and general purpose as possible
• And remember – the DBA is responsible for performance,
scalability, and security. You are not.
WARNING

• If you are reading this, without having it presented


to you by me (Tom Kyte)…. Please remember, this
is tongue in cheek – these are worst practices!!!!
ORA-3113
End of file on communication channel
Also known as “the end”

You might also like