0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views33 pages

Chapter 6 Project

Uploaded by

debesay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views33 pages

Chapter 6 Project

Uploaded by

debesay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 33

Chapter six: Economic and Social Analysis

1 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


At the end of this chapter students will be able to describe:

 Purpose of Economic Analysis of the project

 Economic and social cost benefit analysis of the project

 Approaches of measuring Economic Cost & Benefit of a

project
 Economic Export & Import Parity Price

 Valuation of Non-traded Goods of the project

 Valuing Externalities of the projects

2 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


 Economic analysis of projects is similar in form to financial

analysis in that:- both assess the profit of an investment.

 However, the concept of financial profits not the same as the

social profit of economic analysis.

 The financial analysis of a project identifies the money profit

accruing to the project operating entity,

 whereas social profit measures the effect of a project on the

fundamental objectives of the whole economy.

3 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


 These d/c concepts of project are reflected in the d/t items

considered to be costs and benefits and in their valuation.

 E.g.:- Money payment made by the project operating entity

for labor (wages) is financial cost.

 But it will be an economic cost only to the extent that:- the

use of labor in this project implies some sacrifice elsewhere


in the economy with respect to output and other objectives of
the country.

 If project has economic cost that doesn't involve money outflows


4 Wednesday, June 5, 2024
from the project entity; it will not be considered as financial cost.
 Generally:- some costs & benefits that may appear in financial

accounts may not appear in the economic accounts & vice versa.

 Similarly, some costs & benefits may be lower (higher) in

financial but higher (lower) in economic analysis even though


they appear in both.

 The extent to which economic costs & benefits diverge from

their counterpart financial costs & benefits are:- based on the


presence & extent of market imperfections.

5 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


 Use of economic prices (shadow prices, efficiency prices, or

accounting prices) is an important means for assessing the


economic merits of a project to a country.

 Once financial price for costs & benefits have been determined

& entered in the project accounts:-

o the analyst estimates the economic value of a proposed


project to the nation as a whole.

 The financial prices are the starting point for the economic

analysis:-

6 o It adjusted to reflect the value to the society asJunewhole


Wednesday, 5, 2024 of
 When the market price of any good or service is changed to

make it more closely represent the opportunity cost to the


society:-

 the new value assigned becomes the “shadow price” or

“accounting price” or “economic price” or “efficiency


price”.

7 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


6.1. Purpose of Economic Analysis
I. Selection of alternatives
 The main purpose of project economic analysis is to help

design and select projects that contribute most to the welfare


of a country.

 When used solely, economic analysis serves only a very

limited purpose & hence should not be the only basis for
financial decision.

 Optimal decision can be made based on merit of all

aspects:- (financial, economic, fiscal impact,


Wednesday, June 5, 2024
8
II. Identification of winners and losers
 A good project contributes to the country’s economic output;

hence it has the potential to make everyone better off.

o However, normally not everyone benefits, and someone may

lose.

o Groups that benefits from a project aren’t necessarily those

that incur the costs of the project.

 Identifying those who will gain, those who will pay & those will

lose:
9 Wednesday, June 5, 2024
o gives the analyst insight into the incentives that various
III. Environmental impact

 A d/c b/n society’s point of view & private point of view


concerns:- costs/benefits attributable to the project those not
reflected in its cash flows.

 The effects of the project on the environment, both negative

(costs) and positive (benefits), should be taken into account &


if possible, quantified and assigned a monetary value.

10 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


6.2 Economic Benefit and Cost Analyses

 A project will be profitable to society if the economic benefits of

the project exceed the economic costs or


 If net present value (NPV) of the project to society is greater than

zero.

 Broadly, there are two methods of measuring economic costs &

benefits of a project:

A. UNIDO approach and

B. Little-Mirrlees (L-M) approach

11 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


A. UNIDO approach
 In this method economic benefits & costs measured

 By domestic prices using consumption as the numiraire,

 with adjustment made for the d/c b/n market prices & economic

values &

 making domestic & foreign resources comparable using

shadow exchange rate (SER).

12 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


 In this method:- for traded commodities, first goods will be

adjusted for any distortions in the domestic markets.


After this adjustment is made:- the adjusted domestic price will

be multiplied by SER to make domestic resources be


comparable with foreign resources.
o The easiest way for adjusting domestic market distortions is to

use border prices:-


 c.i.f., for imports &
 f.o.b. for exports and

o then multiply this border price expressed in foreign currency by

13 SER to arrive at economic border prices. Wednesday, June 5, 2024


If the commodities are non-traded, i.e.
 f.o.b. prices are less than domestic prices & domestic

prices less than c.i.f. prices (f.o.b <d.p< c.i.f).


 if the market prices are good estimates of opportunity

cost or willingness to pay:-


o we directly take the market price as economic value of the

item.
 However if the prices of non-traded items are distorted:-

o we will adjust the market price to eliminate distortions &

then use these estimates of opportunity cost as the


14 Wednesday, June 5, 2024
 The UNIDO method can be summarized as follow.

o Suppose we have a project producing export item that uses

both foreign & domestic inputs.


The net benefit would be estimated as:

o Net benefit= SER(X-M)-D

o Where X - border price of exports in foreign currency

M - Border price of imported goods in foreign currency


D - Adjusted values of domestic goods in domestic
currency
SER - is the shadow exchange rate.
15 Wednesday, June 5, 2024
Where SER=
B. Little-Mirrlees (L-M) approach
 In this approach benefits & costs measured at world price to
reflect the true opportunity cost of outputs and inputs.

o It used public saving measured in foreign exchange as the


numéraire (converting everything into its foreign exchange
equivalent).

 The fact that:-foreign exchange is taken as a numéraire does not


mean that project accounts are necessarily expressed in foreign
currency.

o The unit of account can remain the domestic Wednesday,


16 currency:- June 5, 2024
Valuing output /inputs at world prices (as a measure of economic

benefit) is relate with import substitution policies.

 E.G. d/t commercial industries may produce goods at higher

cost than the alternatives available on the international market.


If a project was analyzed at world prices, this would give an

indication:-
 First:- whether it could survive in the long term in the face

of international competition, and


 Secondly:- whether its output could be obtained more

cheaply from international sources.


17 Wednesday, June 5, 2024
 If world prices are used, the economic price at which to value

a project's output is :-
 its export price if it adds to exports, or

 its import price if domestic production leads to a saving in

imports (import substitution)


 Similarly, on the cost side, the price at which to value a project

input is:-
 its import price if it has to be imported, or

 export price if greater use leads to a reduction in exports.

18 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


 The above adjustment applies for traded goods (imported or exported

goods).

o But if the goods or inputs are non-traded goods:- the analyst

needs to use conversion factor to translate domestic prices into


their border price equivalent.

• A conversation factor (CF) is the ratio of the economic


(shadow) price to the market price, that is: CF=

o So the economic price for a non-traded good is its

market price multiplied by the conversion factor.


19 Wednesday, June 5, 2024
 In principle, to find the world price of non-traded goods :-
 each good could be decomposed into its traded & non-traded
components in the chain of production.

 In practice, however, is not feasible to differentiate conversion factors

b/n all non-traded goods b/c the procedure is difficult, time


consuming & costly.

 Thus d/t shortcuts which provide reasonable approximation are

needed.

 In essence, all the shortcuts involve some degree of averaging


for a group of non-traded items.
20 Wednesday, June 5, 2024
 Therefore, some degree of error:- if average or standard
 It’s derived as follows :

Where =domestic price in domestic currency


=world price foreign currency
OER= Official exchange rate
= standard conversion factor
o , ( ) is the
shadow exchange rate (SER)i.e., the price of goods in
domestic currency relative to their world prices
=

o ():-is the shadow price of foreign exchange (PF)

21 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


PF=

Where =Weights for the ith commodity

=domestic price of the ith commodity in domestic currency

=world price in foreign currency

PF= shadow price of foreign exchange

22 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


 The Little-Mirrlees approach of adjusting domestic prices into

economic prices for a project that produces export goods can


summarize as follows:
 Net Present Value (NPV) = OER (X-M) - SCF.D

Where -OER- official exchange rate


X- exported goods in foreign currency
M- imported goods in foreign currency
SCF- standard conversation factor
D- price of non-traded goods in domestic currency
 To summarize:- as long as SCF is the ratio of OER to SER, the two

approaches (UNIDO & Little-mirrless) - differ only to the extent that


SER is different from the actual exchange rate
23 Wednesday, June 5, 2024
6.4: Economic Export and Import Parity Price
A. Export Parity Price
C.i.f. at point of import (say, Canada port)
o Deduct- unloading at point of import
o Deduct- freight to point of import (in this case air freight)
o Deduct – insurance
 Equals – f.o.b. at point of export (A.A)
 Convert foreign currency to domestic currency at official exchange
rate (OER) if you are using the L-M approach or shadow exchange
rate (SER) if you are using UNIDO approach
o Deduct - local port charges
o Deduct - local transport & marketing (if not part of project) at
their economic price and multiply it by SCF in L-M approach
 Equals export parity price at project boundary
o Deduct - local storage, transport & marketing costs (if not part of project
cost) at their economic price and multiply it by SCF in L-M approach
 Equal economic export parity price at project location (farm gate)
24 Wednesday, June 5, 2024
 A parallel computation leads to the economic import parity

price.

 Here the issue can be:-

 finding the price of project's output that is intended to

substitute previous imports or

 the project will use imported inputs.

 In either case, the import parity price can be derived as follows.

25 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


B. Import Parity Price
 F.o.b. price at point of export
o Add-freight charges to point of import
o Add-insurance charges
o Add- unloading from ship to pier at port
 Equals C.i.f. Price at the harbor of importing countries
 Convert foreign currency to domestic one (multiply by OER) if you
use L-M approach and SER if you use UNIDO approach
o Add-local port charges
o Add-transport & marketing costs to relevant wholesale market at
economic price & multiply it by SCF in L-M approach
 Equal price at wholesale market
o Deduct-local storage & other marketing costs at economic price and
SCF in L-M approach (if not part of project cost) -this is the
marketing margin between central market and the project site.
 Equals economic import parity price at project location (Farm / project gate
26 Wednesday, June 5, 2024
price)
6.5. Valuation of non-traded goods
 Any output or input whose value to the economy cannot be

measured in terms of f.o.b. or c.i.f. border prices should be


assessed in relation to its price in the home market.
 This applies to non-traded commodities, usually those:-

o with high transport costs,

o whose domestic supply prices, at the given level of local

demand, are below the c.i.f. price of imports but above the
f.o.b. price of exports.
 It also applies in cases in which government policy isolates
27commodities from foreign markets through import or export
Wednesday, June 5, 2024
 This price in the home market depends on local conditions of

supply & demand, including :-


Market imperfections,

quantity of input demanded and output supplied;

government intervention of different kinds;

taxes and subsidies that are targeted to compensate

external costs (or benefits) and etc

28 Wednesday, June 5, 2024


As a result of market imperfections or indirect taxes, the

marginal value (demand price) of non-traded inputs or outputs


may differ from their marginal cost (supply price).
The shadow price of such goods may be the demand price, the

supply price, or somewhere in between-depending on whether


project inputs or outputs affect the supply to other users, the
demand from other producers, or both.
To accurately account for both quantity and price effects the

analyst need to assess both the demand and supply side of these
non-traded inputs used and outputs produced by the project.
29 Wednesday, June 5, 2024
6.6:Valuing Externalities
 The financial costs of the project will not include the costs

of the externality
 Hence, an evaluation of the project based on private

marginal cost (PMC) will


understate the social costs of the project &

overstates its net benefits.

 In principle, all we need to do to account for the externality

is
Wednesday, June 5, 2024
30 to work with social rather than private costs and benefits.
 In practice, the measurement difficulties are tremendous

because
 often the shape of social marginal cost (SMC) curve, & hence its r/ship

to PMC curve, is unknown.


 also it is not always feasible to trace and measure all external effects.

 Nevertheless, an attempt should always be made to identify

them and if they appear significant, to measure them.


 When externalities cannot be quantified they should be

discussed in qualitative terms.

Wednesday, June 5, 2024


31
 In some cases it is important to “internalize” externalities by

considering a package of closely related activities as one

project - that is, to draw the “project boundary” to include


them.
 Drawing the “project boundary” to internalize externality

can be done in two ways:


1) the project can adopt a technology such as pollution

abatement technology that will reduce or avoided


externalities and
Wednesday, June 5, 2024
32
!!
X

!!
I

U
S

O
R

Y
T E
K P
N
A
A

H
C
TH

F
O
D
33
E N Wednesday, June 5, 2024

You might also like