CL PB SLD2
CL PB SLD2
CL PB SLD2
CHAPTER 2
Limited Liability.
Perpetual Succession
Transferability of Shares
Infinite Membership.
Separate property.
Capacity to Sue.
DISADVANTAGES OF INCORPORATION
Formalities.
Corporate Disclosures.
Loss of privacy.
Control by few.
Possibility of frauds.
LIFTING THE CORPORATE VEIL
The concept of corporate entity was evolved to encourage and promote trade and
commerce but not to commit illegalities or to defraud people. Circumstances may
occur which compel the courts to identify a company with its members. When the
notion of legal entity is used to defeat public convenience, justify wrong, protect
fraud or defend crime the law will not regard the company as a corporate entity
and pays regard to the economic realities behind the legal façade.
In reality the business of the artificial person is always carried on for the benefit of
some individuals. Since an artificial person is not capable of doing anything illegal
or fraudulent, the notion of corporate personality might have to be abandoned to
identify the persons who are really guilty. This is known as ‘lifting the corporate
veil’.
The concept of lifting the corporate veil is a changing concept. It can be lifted for
the benefit of the company too.
Continue….
The circumstances under which the courts may lift the corporate veil may be
discussed under the following two heads :—
One of the fundamental principles of company law is that a company has
personality that is distinct from that of its shareholders. Once a company is
formed and registered under the Act, it is a separate legal entity distinct from
its members. It can sue and be sued in its own name. This rule was laid down
by the House of Lords in Salomon v. Salomon & Co1, in 1897 in which it was
held that even if one individual held almost all the shares and debentures in a
company, and if the remaining shares were held on trust for him, the company
is not to be regarded as a mere shadow of that individual.
(A) COMMON LAW EXCEPTIONS
1. Determination of character. A company is not a natural person with mind or
conscience. But it may assume an enemy character when persons in effective
control of its affairs are residents in any enemy country or wherever residents are
acting under the direction and control of enemies. In times of war the court will lift
the veil to see whether a company is controlled by enemy aliens.
2. Where company is a sham. The court will lift the veil where the company is a
mere cloak or sham i.e. where the device of incorporation is used for some illegal
or improper purpose. Where a person borrowed money from a company and
invested it in three different companies in all of which he and his son were the only
members, the lending company was permitted to attach the assets of all the three
companies as they were created to hood wink the lending company.
3. Prevention of fraud or improper conduct. Where it appears that the company
was incorporated for evading contractual and statutory obligations, the court may
disregard the separate existence of the company.
Continue….
4. Where the company is acting as an agent of the share-holders. Where a
company is acting as an agent of its shareholders or of another company, it will
be liable for its acts.
5. Protection of revenue. The courts may disregard the corporate entity of a
company where it is used for tax evasion or to circumvent tax obligation.
6. Avoidance of welfare legislation. Avoidance of welfare legislation is as
common as the avoidance of taxation. It is the duty of the court in such cases
to get behind the smoke screen and discover the true state of affairs.
7. Punishment of contempt of court. Persons responsible for contempt of court
can be punished, if contempt of court is done by a company. Courts can find
real offender by lifting the corporate veil.
8. Ascertaining true nature of transaction if alleged as sham. Court will be
justified in lifting the corporate veil to ascertain the true nature of transaction as
to who are the real parties to sale and whether it is genuine and bonafide.
Continue….
Sr.
Particular Company Partnership Firm
No.
1. Governing Law Companies Act, 2013 and The Indian Partnership Act,
various Rules made thereunder 1932 and various Rules
made thereunder
2. Registration/ Compulsory Optional
Incorporation
3. Minimum Minimum two for private Minimum two partners.
Number of Company and minimum seven
Members for public company and minimum
one for one person company as
per the Companies Act, 2013.
Continue….