0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views35 pages

UNIT-III PPT Os

The document discusses different techniques for handling deadlocks in operating systems including deadlock prevention, avoidance, and detection. Deadlock prevention methods aim to enforce restrictions to ensure that one of the four conditions for deadlock is never satisfied. Deadlock avoidance uses additional information to dynamically monitor the system state and ensure it remains in a safe state where deadlock cannot occur. Deadlock detection allows the system to enter a deadlocked state and then detects and recovers from the deadlock.

Uploaded by

Srinu Telugu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views35 pages

UNIT-III PPT Os

The document discusses different techniques for handling deadlocks in operating systems including deadlock prevention, avoidance, and detection. Deadlock prevention methods aim to enforce restrictions to ensure that one of the four conditions for deadlock is never satisfied. Deadlock avoidance uses additional information to dynamically monitor the system state and ensure it remains in a safe state where deadlock cannot occur. Deadlock detection allows the system to enter a deadlocked state and then detects and recovers from the deadlock.

Uploaded by

Srinu Telugu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 35

OPERATING SYSTEMS

Unit-3 DEADLOCKS

Dr. B. Rebecca
Department of Computer Science and
Engineering(Data Science)
Deadlocks
• The Deadlock Problem

• System Model

• Deadlock Characterization

• Methods for Handling Deadlocks

• Deadlock Prevention
• Deadlock Avoidance

• Deadlock Detection
• Recovery from Deadlock
The Deadlock Problem

• A set of blocked processes each holding a resource and


waiting to acquire a resource held by another process in
the set.
• Example
– System has 2 disk drives.
– P1 and P2 each hold one disk drive and each needs
another one.
• Example
– semaphores A and B, initialized to 1
P0 P1
wait (A); wait(B)
wait (B); wait(A)
Bridge Crossing Example

• Traffic only in one direction.


• Each section of a bridge can be viewed as a resource.
• If a deadlock occurs, it can be resolved if one car backs
up (preempt resources and rollback).
• Several cars may have to be backed up if a deadlock
occurs.
• Starvation is possible.
System Model

• Resource types R1, R2, . . ., Rm


CPU cycles, memory space, I/O devices
• Each resource type Ri has Wi instances.

• Each process utilizes a resource as follows:


– request
– use
– Release
• Examples:
– Two processes one printer, one DVD drive.
– Two processes and two hard disks
Deadlock Characterization
eadlock can arise if four conditions hold simultaneously
• Mutual exclusion: only one process at a time can use a
resource.
• Hold and wait: a process holding at least one resource is
waiting to acquire additional resources held by other
processes.
• No preemption: a resource can be released only
voluntarily by the process holding it, after that process has
completed its task.
• Circular wait: there exists a set {P0, P1, …, P0} of waiting processes
such that
– P0 is waiting for a resource that is held by P1,
– P1 is waiting for a resource that is held by P2, …,
– Pn–1 is waiting for a resource that is held by Pn,
– and Pn is waiting for a resource that is held by P0.
Resource-Allocation Graph

A set of vertices V and a set of edges E.

• V is partitioned into two types:

P = {P1, P2, …, Pn}, the set consisting of all the


processes in the system.

R = {R1, R2, …, Rm}, the set consisting of all resource


types in the system.
• request edge – directed edge P1  Rj
• assignment edge – directed edge Rj  Pi
• Process

• Resource Type with 4 instances

• Pi requests instance of Rj

Pi
Rj
• Pi is holding an instance of Rj

Pi
Rj
Example of a Resource Allocation Graph
Resource Allocation Graph With A Deadlock
Graph With A Cycle But No Deadlock
Methods for Handling Deadlocks

• Use a protocol to avoid deadlock, ensuring that


the system will never enter a deadlock state.

• Allow the system to enter a deadlock state,


detect it, and recover.

• Ignore the problem and pretend that deadlocks


never occur in the system;
– used by most operating systems, including UNIX and
Windows; the application developer to write
programs that handle deadlocks.
Deadlock Prevention
• We can prevent the occurrence of a deadlock by ensuring that at
least one of four conditions cannot hold.
• Mutual Exclusion
– The mutual-exclusion condition must hold for non-sharable
resources.
– Sharable resources do not require mutual exclusive access and
thus cannot be involved in a deadlock.
• Hold and Wait
– must guarantee that whenever a process requests a resource, it
does not hold any other resources.
– Require process to request and be allocated all its resources before
it begins execution, or allow process to request resources only
when the process has none.
– Low resource utilization.
– Starvation possible.
• No Preemption

– If a process that is holding some resources, requests another


resource that cannot be immediately allocated to it, then all
resources currently being held are released.

– Preempted resources are added to the list of resources for


which the process is waiting.

– Process will be restarted only when it can regain its old


resources, as well as the new ones that it is requesting.

• Circular Wait

– impose a total ordering of all resource types, and require that


each process requests resources in an increasing order of
enumeration.

– A process can initially request any no. of instances of a resource


Ri ,, after that, it can request a resource Rj if and only if
F(Rj)>F(Ri)
Deadlock Avoidance
Requires that the system has some additional a priori
information available.

• Simplest and most useful model requires that each


process declare the maximum number of resources of
each type that it may need.

• The deadlock-avoidance algorithm dynamically


examines the resource-allocation state to ensure that
there can never be a circular-wait condition.

• Resource-allocation state is defined by the number of


available and allocated resources, and the maximum
demands of the processes.
Safe State
• When a process requests an available resource, system must
decide if immediate allocation leaves the system in a safe
state.

• A System is in a safe state only if there exists a safe


sequence.
• A sequence of process <P1, P2, …, Pn> is a safe sequence for
the current allocation state if , for each P i, the resource
requests that Pi can still make can be satisfied by currently
available resources + resources held by all the Pj, with j < i.

• That is:
– If Pi resource needs are not immediately available, then Pi
can wait until all Pj have finished.
– When Pj is finished, Pi can obtain needed resources,
execute, return allocated resources, and terminate.
– When Pi terminates, Pi +1 can obtain its needed resources,
and so on.
• If a system is in safe state  no deadlocks.

• If a system is in unsafe state  possibility of deadlock.

• Avoidance  ensure that a system will never enter an unsafe state.

Safe, Unsafe , Deadlock State


Avoidance algorithms

• Single instance of a resource type. Use a


resource-allocation graph

• Multiple instances of a resource type. Use


the banker’s algorithm
Resource-Allocation Graph Scheme
• Claim edge Pi  Rj indicated that process Pj may
request resource Rj; at some time in the future,
represented by a dashed line.

• Claim edge converts to request edge when a process


requests a resource.

• Request edge converted to an assignment edge Rj 


Pi when the resource is allocated to the process.

• When a resource is released by a process, assignment


edge reconverts to a claim edge.

• Resources must be claimed a priori in the system.


Resource-Allocation Unsafe State In Resource-
Graph Allocation Graph
Banker’s Algorithm

• Multiple instances.

• Each process must a priori claim maximum use.

• When a process requests a resource it may have to


wait.

• When a process gets all its resources it must return


them in a finite amount of time.
1. Data Structures for the Banker’s Algorithm

= number of processes, and m = number of resources ty

• Available: Vector of length m. If available [j] = k, there


are k instances of resource type Rj available.
• Max: n x m matrix. If Max [i,j] = k, then process Pi may
request at most k instances of resource type Rj.
• Allocation: n x m matrix. If Allocation[i,j] = k then Pi is
currently allocated k instances of Rj.
• Need: n x m matrix. If Need[i,j] = k, then Pi may need k
more instances of Rj to complete its task.

Need [i,j] = Max[i,j] – Allocation [i,j].


2. Safety Algorithm

1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n,


respectively. Initialize:
Work = Available
Finish [i] = false for i = 0, 1, …, n- 1.
2. Find and i such that both:
(a) Finish [i] = false
(b) Needi  Work
If no such i exists, go to step 4.
3. Work = Work + Allocationi
Finish[i] = true
go to step 2.
4. If Finish [i] == true for all i, then the system is in a safe
state.
• The content of the matrix Need is defined to be Max –
Allocation.

Need
ABC
P0 743
P1 122
P2 600
P3 011
P4 431

• The system is in a safe state since the sequence < P1,


P3, P4, P2, P0> satisfies safety criteria.
Example of Banker’s Algorithm

• 5 processes P0 through P4;


3 resource types:
A (10 instances), B (5instances), and C (7
instances).
• Snapshot at time T0:
Allocation Max Available
ABC ABC ABC
P0 010 753 332
P1 200 322
P2 302 902
P3 211 222
P4 002 433
Example: P1 Request (1,0,2)

• Check that Request  Available (that is, (1,0,2)  (3,3,2)


 true.
Allocation Need Available
ABC ABC ABC
P0 010 743 230
P1 302 020
P2 301 600
P3 211 011
P4 002 431
• Executing safety algorithm shows that sequence < P1, P3,
P4, P0, P2> satisfies safety requirement.
• Can request for (3,3,0) by P4 be granted?
Deadlock Detection
• Allow system to enter deadlock state

• Detection algorithm

• Recovery scheme
Single Instance of Each Resource Type

• Maintain wait-for graph


– Nodes are processes.
– Pi  Pj if Pi is waiting for Pj.

• Periodically invoke an algorithm that searches for a


cycle in the graph. If there is a cycle, there exists a
deadlock.

• An algorithm to detect a cycle in a graph requires an


order of n2 operations, where n is the number of
vertices in the graph.
Resource-Allocation Graph and Wait-for
Graph

Resource-Allocation Graph
Corresponding wait-for graph
Several Instances of a Resource Type

• Available: A vector of length m indicates the number of


available resources of each type.

• Allocation: An n x m matrix defines the number of


resources of each type currently allocated to each process.

• Request: An n x m matrix indicates the current request of


each process. If Request [ij] = k, then process Pi is
requesting k more instances of resource type. Rj.
Detection Algorithm

1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, respectively


Initialize:
(a) Work = Available
(b) For i = 1,2, …, n, if Allocationi  0, then
Finish[i] = false;otherwise, Finish[i] = true.
2. Find an index i such that both:
(a) Finish[i] == false
(b) Requesti  Work

If no such i exists, go to step 4.

3. Work = Work + Allocationi


Finish[i] = true
go to step 2.
4. If Finish[i] == false, for some i, 1  i  n, then the system is in
deadlock state. Moreover, if Finish[i] == false, then Pi is deadlocked.
Algorithm requires an order of O(m x n2) operations to
detect whether the system is in deadlocked state.
Example of Detection Algorithm

• Five processes P0 through P4; three resource types


A (7 instances), B (2 instances), and C (6 instances).
• Snapshot at time T0:
Allocation Request Available
ABC ABC ABC
P0 010 000 000
P1 200 202
P2 303 000
P3 211 100
P4 002 002
• Sequence <P0, P2, P3, P1, P4> will result in Finish[i] = true
for all i.
• P2 requests an additional instance of type C.
Request
ABC
P0 000
P1 201
P2 001
P3 100
P4 002
• State of system?
– Can reclaim resources held by process P0, but
insufficient resources to fulfill other processes;
requests.
– Deadlock exists, consisting of processes P1, P2, P3,
and P4.
Recovery from Deadlock: Process Termination
• Abort all deadlocked processes.

• Abort one process at a time until the deadlock cycle is


eliminated.

• In which order should we choose to abort?


– Priority of the process.
– How long process has computed, and how much longer
to completion.
– Resources the process has used.
– Resources process needs to complete.
– How many processes will need to be terminated.
– Is process interactive or batch?
Recovery from Deadlock: Resource Preemption

• Selecting a victim – minimize cost.

• Rollback – return to some safe state, restart


process for that state.

• Starvation – same process may always be


picked as victim, include number of rollback in
cost factor.

You might also like