RRChapter 04

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 46

Professional Ethics

Chapter 4

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4-1


What Are Ethics?

Ethics can be defined broadly as


a set of moral principles or values.

Each of us has such a set of values.

We may or may not have considered


them explicitly.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4-2


Illustrative Prescribed
Ethical Principles
 Trustworthiness  Respect

 Responsibility  Fairness

 Caring  Citizenship

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4-3


Need for Ethics

Ethical behavior is necessary for a society


to function in an orderly manner.

The need for ethics in society is sufficiently


important that many commonly held
ethical values are incorporated into laws.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4-4


Why People Act Unethically

The person’s ethical standards are different


from those of society as a whole.

The person chooses to act selfishly.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4-5


A Person Chooses to
Act Selfishly – Example
Person A finds a briefcase containing
important papers and $1,000.

He tosses the briefcase and keeps the money.

He brags to his friends about his good fortune.

This action probably differs from most of society.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4-6


A Person Chooses to
Act Selfishly – Example
Person B faces the same situation but
responds differently.

He keeps the money but leaves the briefcase.

He tells nobody and spends the money.

He has violated his own ethical standards


and chose to act selfishly.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4-7


Ethical Dilemmas

An ethical dilemma is a situation a person


faces in which a decision must be made
about appropriate behavior.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4-8


Rationalizing
Unethical Behavior
 Everybody does it

 If it’s legal, it’s ethical

 Likelihood of discovery and consequences

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4-9


Resolving Ethical Dilemmas

1. Obtain the relevant facts

2. Identify the ethical issues from the facts

3. Determine who is affected

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 10


Resolving Ethical Dilemmas

4. Identify the alternatives available to the


person who must resolve the dilemma
5. Identify the likely consequence of each
alternative
6. Decide the appropriate action

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 11


Relevant Facts

A staff person has been informed that


he will work hours without recording
them as hours worked.

Firm policy prohibits this practice.

Another staff person has stated that


this is common practice in the firm.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 12


Ethical Issue

Is it ethical for the staff person to work hours and


not record them as hours worked in this situation?

 Who is affected?  How are they affected?

What alternatives does the staff person have?

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 13


Special Need for Ethical
Conduct in Professions
Our society has attached a special
meaning to the term professional.

Professionals are expected to conduct


themselves at a higher level
than most other members of society.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 14


Difference Between CPA
Firms and Other Professionals
CPA firms are engaged and paid by the
company issuing the financial statements.

Primary beneficiaries of the audit are


statement users.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 15


CPAs Encouraged to Conduct
Themselves at a High Level
CPA GAAS and
examination interpretations Continuing
education
requirements
Quality
control
Conduct of
Legal
CPA firm
liability
personnel
Peer
review
AICPA practice
Code of sections
PCAOB
Professional
and SEC
Conduct

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 16


Code of Professional Conduct
Ideal standards of ethical conduct
Principles stated in philosophical terms.
They are not enforceable.
Minimum standards of ethical
Rules of
conduct stated as specific rules.
conduct
They are enforceable.
Interpretation of the rules of conduct by
Interpretations
the AICPA Division of Professional Ethics.
of the rules
They are not enforceable, but a
of conduct
practitioner must justify departure.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 17


Code of Professional Conduct
Published explanations and answers
to questions about the rules of
conduct submitted to the AICPA by
Ethical
practitioners and others interested
rulings
in ethical requirements.
They are not enforceable, but a
practitioner must justify departure.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 18


Ethical Principles

1. Responsibilities:
Professionals should exercise sensitive and
moral judgments in all their activities.

2. The public interest:


Members should accept the obligation to act
in a way that will serve and honor the public.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 19


Ethical Principles

3. Integrity:
Members should perform all responsibilities
with integrity to maintain public confidence.

4. Objectivity and independence:


Members should be objective, independent,
and free of conflicts of interest.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 20


Ethical Principles

5. Due care:
Members should observe the profession’s
standards and strive to improve competence.

6. Scope and nature of services:


A member in public practice should observe
the Code of Professional Conduct.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 21


Standards of Conduct
Ideal conduct
Principles
by practitioners

Minimum level
Rules of
of conduct by
conduct
practitioners Substandard
conduct

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 22


Learning Objective 5

Understand Sarbanes-Oxley Act


and other SEC and PCAOB
independence requirements
and additional factors that
influence auditor independence.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 23


Independence

The value of auditing depends heavily


on the public’s perception of the
independence of auditors.

 Independence in fact

 Independence in appearance

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 24


Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC Provisions
Addressing Auditor Independence

The SEC adopted rules strengthening auditor


independence in January 2003 consistent with
the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the revised SEC


rules further restrict, but do not completely
eliminate the type of nonaudit services
that can be provided to the public.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 25


Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC Provisions
Addressing Auditor Independence

The PCAOB has also issued additional


independence rules related to the
provision of certain tax services.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 26


Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC Provisions
Addressing Auditor Independence
Prohibited Services
1. Bookkeeping and other accounting services
2. Financial information systems design and implementation
3. Appraisal or valuation services
4. Actuarial services
5. Internal audit outsourcing
6. Management of human resource functions
7. Broker, dealer, or investment adviser
or investment banker services
8. Legal and expert services unrelated to the audit
9. Any other service that the PCAOB determines
by regulation is impermissible

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 27


Audit Committees

An audit committee is a selected number


of members of a company’s board of directors
whose responsibilities include helping
auditors remain independent of management.

Most audit committees are made up of three


to five or sometimes as many as seven
directors who are not a part of company
management.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 28


Audit Committees

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that all


members of the audit committee
be independent.

Companies must disclose whether or not


the audit committee includes at least
one financial expert.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 29


Conflicts Arising from
Employment Relationships
The SEC has added a one year “cooling off ”
period before a member of the audit
engagement team can work for the
client in certain key management positions.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 30


Partner Rotation

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that


the lead and concurring audit partner
rotate off the audit engagement
after a period of five years.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 31


Ownership Interests

SEC rules on financial relationships


take an engagement perspective.

SEC rules prohibit ownership in


audit clients by those persons
who can influence the audit.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 32


Independence Standards
Board
 It was dissolved in July 2001

ISB pronouncements and interpretations


remain enforceable unless they conflict
with the independence rulings
issued by the SEC.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 33


Other Issues
 Shopping for accounting principles

 Engagement and payment of


audit fees by management

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 34


Rules of Conduct
 Rule 101 – Independence

A member in public practice shall be


independent in the performance of
professional services as required by
standards promulgated by bodies
designated by Council.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 35


Financial Interests

Interpretations of Rule 101 prohibit


covered members from owning any
direct investments in audit clients.

 Covered members

 Direct versus indirect financial interest

 Material or immaterial

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 36


Related Financial
Interests Issues
 Former practitioners
 Normal lending procedures
 Financial interests and employment
of immediate and close family members
 Joint investor or investee relationship
with client
 Director, officer, management,
or employee of a company

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 37


Litigation Between CPA Firm
and Client
A lawsuit or intent to start a lawsuit between
a CPA firm and its client, the ability of the
CPA firm and client to remain objective
is questionable.

The interpretations regard such litigation as


a violation of Rule 101.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 38


Bookkeeping and Other
Services
The AICPA Code permits a CPA firm
to do both bookkeeping and auditing
for the same client.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 39


Bookkeeping and Other
Services
1. Client must accept full responsibility
for the financial statements.

2. The CPA must not assume the role


of employee or of management.

3. The audit must conform to GASS.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 40


Bookkeeping and Other
Services
The SEC and AICPA rules do not allow
audit firms to provide bookkeeping
services to public company audit clients.

 Consulting and other nonaudit services

 Unpaid fees

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 41


Other Rules of Conduct

102 – Integrity and objectivity


201 – General standards
202 – Compliance with standards
203 – Accounting principles
301 – Confidential client information

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 42


Other Rules of Conduct

302 – Contingent fees


501 – Acts discreditable
502 – Advertising and other forms
of solicitation
503 – Commissions and referral fees
505 – Form of organization and name

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 43


Learning Objective 8

Describe the enforcement


mechanisms for the rules
of conduct.

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 44


Enforcement
 Action by AICPA Professional Ethics Division

Action by a state Board of Accountancy

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 45


End of Chapter 4

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 4 - 46

You might also like