PNR&CM 2024
PNR&CM 2024
PNR&CM 2024
April, 2024
1
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Description of Natural Resources
1.1.1 Definition
• Natural resources are naturally occurring substances that are considered valuable in their relatively
unmodified or natural form.
• They are resources available in nature like land, air, water, sunlight, soil, minerals, wild flora &
fauna.
• They are gifts of nature that the mankind uses or can potentially use to create material wealth.
• They maintain the chemical balance of the Earth, stabilize climate, protect watersheds, renew
soil and provide a wide range of goods and services .
• They are source of food, raw material, genetic material, medicine, employment and wealth.
• The diversity of nature is a source of beauty, enjoyment, understanding, and knowledge a
foundation for human creativity and a subject for study.
2
Con’t
In general natural resource have the following function:
human use.
2. Biotic function: habitats and gene reserves for plants, animals and micro-
3. Climate regulative function: sink GHG, form global energy balance, and
non living components of env’t (air, soil, biota & water) within ecosystem.
4
Con’t
8. Living space function: site for settlements, industrial, sports & recreation.
10. Connective space function: space for the transport, inputs and produce, and
for the movement of plants and animals between discrete areas of natural
ecosystems.
5
1.1.2 Classifications of Natural Resources
• There are various methods of categorizing natural resources.
• These include :- source of origin, stage of development, and by their continual
utility or renewability.
A. On the basis of origin:-
Biotic- biotic resources are obtained from the biosphere (living and organic
material), such as forests and animals, and materials that can be obtained from
them.
Fossil fuels such as :- coal and petroleum are also included in this category
because they are formed from decayed organic matter.
Abiotic- Abiotic resources are those that come from non-living, non-organic
material. Examples of abiotic resources include land, fresh water, air and
heavy metals including ores such as gold, iron, copper, silver, etc.
05/07/2024 6
b. On the basis of stage of development :-
Potential Resources – Potential resources are those that exist in a region and
may be used in the future. For example, petroleum occurs with sedimentary
rocks in various regions. But, until the time it is actually drilled out and put into
use, it remains a potential resource.
Actual Resources – Actual resources are those that have been surveyed, their
quantity and quality determined and are being used in present times. The
development of an actual resource, such as wood processing depends upon the
technology available and the cost involved.
Reserve Resources – The part of an actual resource which can be developed
profitably in the future
Stock Resources – Stock resources are those that have been surveyed but cannot
be used by organisms due to lack of technology. For example: hydrogen.
05/07/2024 7
C. Based On Renewability
Renewable Resources – can be replenished naturally. Some of these resources,
like sunlight, air, wind, etc., are continuously available and their quantity is not
noticeably affected by human consumption.
Non-Renewable Resources – either form slowly or do not naturally form in the
environment.
Minerals are the most common resource included in this category.
Natural Resource Management
Is technique which deals about the way of handling or managing those natural
resources around our localities.
Mainly focuses on land, water, soil, plants and animals, with a particular
attention on how management affects the quality of life for both present and
future generations.
05/07/2024 8
Natural resource management issues are inherently complex as they involve the
ecological cycles, hydrological cycles, climate, animals, plants and geography etc.
All these are dynamic and inter-related.
A change in one of them may have far reaching and/or long term impacts which
may even be irreversible.
Natural resource management also has to manage various stakeholders and their
interests, policies, politics, geographical boundaries, economic implications and the
list goes on.
It is very difficult to satisfy all aspects at the same time.
This results in conflicting situations.
05/07/2024 9
Cont...
The key objectives of NRM include
Ensuring adequate and sustainable supply and efficient use of natural resources or the
creation of wealth and well-being in society,
Avoiding the destruction of nature's capacities for reproduction and regeneration of
resources and absorption of residuals;
Securing the co-existence of society and nature.
To sustain ecological diversity.
To offer or provide resources for upcoming generations.
To maintain basic amenities supply for the people.
To improve the quality of living of all organisms.
To maintain the ecological balance for sustainable development.
To maintain employment facilities for people.
After the United Nations Conference for the Environment and Development (UNCED)
held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, most nations subscribed to new principles for the
integrated management of land, water, and forests.
…
Information management
Risk management
05/07/2024 12
3. Integrated Natural Resource Management(INRM)
Is a process of managing natural resources in a systematic way, which includes
multiple aspects of natural resource use (biophysical, socio-political, and
economic) meet production goals of producers and other direct users (e.g.,
food security, profitability, risk aversion) as well as goals of the wider
community (e.g., poverty alleviation, welfare of future generations,
environmental conservation).
It focuses on sustainability and at the same time tries to incorporate all
possible stakeholders from the planning level itself to reduce possible future
conflicts.
INRM is being used extensively and been successful in regional and
community based natural management.
05/07/2024 13
4. Precautionary Biodiversity Management
05/07/2024 14
5. Top-down (Command And Control) Community-based Natural Resource Management
The government imposes some polices and laws from the above.
Then, the community is obliged to implement those laws imposed from the
above.
Most of the time, this approach is not advisable. Because, the community does
not participate on initiation and adoption of polices and laws.
05/07/2024 15
All the things we use and consume are obtained from natural resources.
There is scarcity of resource and inequitable distribution
Due to natural hazards
Poverty, war, population explosion, industrialization (waste disposal and pollution),
resultant urbanization, energy crisis, over use of agro-chemicals, illegal poaching, habitat
loss or deforestation, erosion, overharvesting, introduction of invasive alien species,
corruption, and the lobby of the rich and over exploitation of the natural resources
increase the demand for natural resources and limit their availability.
The unequal consumption of natural resources.
Advanced countries produce over 75% of global industrial waste and green house gases.
Energy from fossil fuels is consumed in relatively much greater quantities in developed
countries.
Ineffective use of resources can also cause considerable losses to environment and
economics impacts.
1.2 Global Distribution of Natural Resources
Distribution, stock and quality of natural resources is uneven at global level
Natural resources are not evenly distributed all over the world due to variation in
For instance, some regions have lots of water (and access to the ocean and seas).
world, is home to endemic and biodiverse fauna and flora, and contains rich natural
USA has the world’s largest coal reserves with 491 billion tons.
The USA, Russia, and Canada are the leading producers of timber and pulp.
Many countries have developed their economies by using their natural resources.18
Con’t
Brazil and Peru, for example, make a lot of money from The Amazon Forests, which
International and local trade has its roots in the fact that resources are not evenly
Regions with crude oil can drill oil and sell to regions without oil, and also buy
resources such as timber and precious metals (gold, diamonds, and silver) from
Countries and regions have even gone to war over the management, ownership,
20
1.3 Natural Resources of Ethiopia
Ethiopia, located in the horn of Africa, has long been recognized for its wealth of natural
resources and a country of diverse ethnic, religious and cultural group.
Our country is the homeland for so many natural resources and endowed with rich natural
resource base be it biological, physical or mineral.
Some of the abundant resources in Ethiopia are :-fertile land, water resources , good atmosphere,
Biodiversity, mountains , etc.
In Ethiopia land is the primary means for livelihood generations, main vehicle to invest,
accumulate wealth and transfer it between generations for the most of the poor in developing
Countries.
The total land area of Ethiopia is 999,541 kilometer square. Out of this 66% of the total area is
suitable for agriculture.
However, only 14% is covered by annual and perennial crops. Area coverage by other land uses
includes: high forest (3.6%), bush (8.1%) and range lands (51%).
21
Cont..
There are 10 major soil types that are estimated to cover 75.2 percent of the total area
of Ethiopia.
Up to 400 tons of fertile soil per hectare is lost annually from land with poor vegetation
cover as well as from land where no effective soil conservation measures have been
carried out.
The soil thus lost annually is from the farmlands, which make up 15.3 percent of the
total area.
It is estimated that the amount of soil that the country loses annually due to water and
wind erosion reaches 1.5 billion to 1.9 billion tones.
Ethiopia is endowed with vast energy resources like: biomass, water, fossil fuel,
geothermal, wind and solar energy. 22
Cont..
Biomass: this energy is the very source of Ethiopian energy. 94% of the Ethiopian energy
consumption is predominately based on biomass energy.
Water: Ethiopia is endowed with substantial water resources.
The country is described as the water tower in east Africa.
The water resources are lakes, different drainage basins, wetlands and rain fall.
Though Ethiopia is not using its water resources efficiently, now a day it is using for
hydroelectric, irrigation, fishing and recreation.
Ethiopia's hydropower potential is estimated up to 45,000 MW and is the 2nd highest in Africa
(only DR. Congo has a higher potential).
From the total energy consumption of the nation, it accounts only 1%.
In Ethiopia more than100 MW of geothermal power have so far been used along the rift valley.
However the total geothermal based electricity generation capacity is estimated to 7000 MW. 23
Cont..
It receives a solar irradiation of 5000 – 7000 Wh/m².
Ethiopia has good wind resources with velocities ranging from 7 to 9 m/s.
Its wind energy potential is estimated to be 10,000 MW.
Because of its location, Ethiopia experiences overhead sun twice a year which makes the country part
of the tropical region and country of thirteen months of sun shine.
Ethiopia is with in wide range of high and low altitude that makes the country home for different
fauna and flora.
However, some of them are in imminent danger to extinction especially endemic wild animals and
some plant varieties.
The resource base of the country is under threat of heavy degradation with interrelated natural and
man made factors rooted from the increase in human and livestock population coupled with unwise
utilization, deforestation, desertification, loss of biodiversity, soil erosion, soil fertility, loss,
sanitization, environmental pollution, climate change and seasonal variability.
24
Ownership Regimes of Natural Resources
• Natural resource management approaches can be affected by the ownership
and the right of stakeholders who are owners of those natural resources.
• In most case the domestic constitutions of each country determine the owner
of natural resources. E.g. The FDRE constitution under article 40(3) stipulates
that the ownership of all natural resources is exclusively vested in state and
peoples of Ethiopia.
• Specifically regarding land the constitution states that land is the common
property of the nations, nationalities and peoples of Ethiopia and shall not
subject to sale or other means of Exchange.
• Generally Ownerships of resources can be categorized as follows:-
05/07/2024 25
1. State property Regime
…
Ownership and control over the use of resources is in hands of the state.
Individuals or groups may be able to make use of the resources, but only at the permission
of the state. National forest, National parks and military reservations are some examples.
2. Private property Regime
Any property owned by a defined individual or corporate entity.
Both the benefit and duties to the resources fall to the owner(s). Private land is the most
common example.
3. Common property Regime
It is a private property of a group. In other word, when a group of individuals own a certain
property.
The group may vary in size, nature and internal structure e.g. indigenous neighbours of
village. Some examples of common property are community forests.
05/07/2024 26
4. Non-property Regimes (Open Access)
There is no definite owner of these properties. Each potential user has equal ability to use it
as they wish.
These areas are the most exploited. It is said that "Everybody's property is nobody’s
property". An example is a lake fishery.
It will causes tragedy of the Commons
5. Hybrid Regimes
Many ownership regimes governing natural resources will contain parts of more than one
of the regimes described above, so natural resource managers need to consider the impact
of hybrid regime.
05/07/2024 27
1.4.1 Community participation
concepts
Community have no one definition, three basic types of definition: 1)
communities of place, or people who live in the same location; 2) communities
of practice, or people who do the same thing to make a living (farmers, fishers,
lawyers); and 3) communities of interest, or people who have the same concerns
and desires.
It is a group of people who share an interest, concerns or identities, a
neighborhood, or a common set of circumstances.
28
Con’t
Participation implies a process by which people are enabled to become actively and
genuinely involved in defining the issues of concern to them, in making decisions about
factors that affect their lives, in formulating and implementing policies, in planning,
developing and delivering services and in taking action to achieve change.
It is a process of empowering and transforming individuals and communities by acquiring
skills, knowledge and experience, ultimately leading to greater self-reliance.
Characteristics of participation
The characteristics of effective participatory planning processes are that they:
have active, informed and equitable participation of all interested stakeholders throughout
the process;
provide opportunities for the diverse views and opinions of stakeholders to be presented
29
Con’t
Seek to negotiate between stakeholders to manage conflicts and build consensus;
Effectively communicate information to stakeholders so that they can understand the
issues, form opinions, and make decisions;
Recognize the inequities among stakeholders and seek to find approaches that facilitate
Voice and ensure that the more powerful stakeholders do not dominate or manipulate the
process;
Families, Community groups, Government officials, and other stakeholders get together to work
Since no government or authority has the means to solve all the public problems adequately, it is
However, delegating powers to people is not an easy task and involves great inquiry into the change in
Community participation brings many long-lasting benefits (sustainable) to people instead of only a
Community participation is inherently good and brings people together in creating and making decisions about their
environment.
Since people are actively involved in the process, participation helps promote sense of ownership and control among
the community.
Community participation can lead to the social development of the people (empowerment, independence)
The aim of involving people in the community to get the maximum benefit for the whole society.
Studies have documented that, communities that engage their citizens and partners deeply in the work of community
development: raise more resources, achieve more results, and develop in a more holistic and ultimately more
beneficial way.
32
Con’t
Common elements of sound community participation are: Many people, many centered, open and advertised,
open to all ideas, inclusive and diverse, open mind and open process.
1. Sharing project costs: participants are asked to contribute money or labor (and occasionally goods) during the
2. Increasing project efficiency: beneficiary consultation during project planning or beneficiary involvement in
3. Increasing project effectiveness: greater beneficiary involvement to help ensure that the project achieves its
33
objectives and that benefits go to the intended groups.
Con’t
4. Building beneficiary capacity: either through ensuring that participants are actively involved in
project planning and implementation or through formal or informal training and consciousness-
raising activities.
5. Increasing empowerment: seeking to increase the control of the underprivileged sectors of society
over the resources and decisions affecting their lives and their participation in the benefits produced
6. Develop holistic and integrated approaches: untrained people or community members can think
from their own perspectives, making valuable contribution to the formulation of holistic and cross -
34
cutting approaches that can meaningfully address the complex issues.
Con’t
7. Increase democracy: community participation in decision making, planning and action is a human right.
An increasing number of citizens are disillusioned with government and want to see more participatory
approaches to democracy.
It is increasingly being argued that new Styles and structured of governance are needed that transcend people
being viewed as passive recipients of services provided by agencies and decided by elected representatives and
8. Combat exclusion: community development and community organizing often works with specific groups of the
• By giving these communities a voice, community participation can play an important role in combating social
35
exclusion within society.
1.5 Natural Resource Conflicts
When one raises the question of what a conflict is, it is typically defined with a list of
negative words, such as violence, population displacement, hatred and war.
In reality, we live with conflicts in our daily lives, and they are not necessarily negative.
Rather, they are normal, natural and neutral, but the way they are managed matters.
Conflicts are inevitable, violence is not.
Conflicts are the result of human diversity and may have positive consequences as much
as negative.
Conflicts management based on cooperation can lead to social progress and change.
Conflict is generally understood as a social phenomenon which results from the
differences in the social circumstances and/or disparate interests of at least two parties
(individuals, groups, states, etc). 36
Con’t
A conflict is not necessarily violent.
The conflict often occurs during a change. Some want change, while others
oppose it.
If their disagreement or conflict is addressed peacefully, the process can be
positive.
But, when the conflict is not managed properly, it becomes violent.
Conflict is often the result of incompatible needs, goals, or aspirations.
Needs such as: food, shelter, health, safety, freedom and justice might be
threatened or perceived to be threatened.
37
Con’t
Conflict is a natural and necessary part of our lives.
Conflict may occur; at home with our families, at work with colleagues or
in negotiations between governments.
Conflict is both the force that can tear relationships apart and the force
that binds them together.
In most cases conflict is as a result of the following: different perception,
different behaviors or attitudes, poor distribution of resources, lack of basic
human needs or their frustration, different interests and ideological
differences based on religion or political parties.
38
Con’t
Conflict can build new relationships. Conflict can create coalitions. It serves as
a safety-valve mechanism which helps to sustain relationships.
Conflict helps parties assess each other’s power and can work to redistribute
power in a system of conflict.
Natural resources are embedded in an environment, geographic, geopolitical
and interdependent space where actions by one individual or group may
generate eff ects far beyond specific localities or even national jurisdictions.
This is particularly true of shared trans-boundary resources. For instance
larger Nile basin, which is shared by nine countries, namely Egypt, Ethiopia,
Sudan, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Burundi, Rwanda and the DRC. 39
Con’t
Due to the loss of Mau Forest cover, unsustainable agricultural expansion and
intensification (including irrigation) and human population growth, socio-cultural and
socioeconomic actors in the Mara River basin increasingly face inadequate access to water.
Apart from the water security vulnerabilities are threats related to loss of virgin forest
cover in the upper parts of the catchment area and along rivers, environmental crimes
related to water pollution, and high levels of water use by industries and urban settlements.
These problems have provided serious environmental security problems, e.g. decreasing
water supplies, competition for and conflicts over the available water, inappropriate and
poorly planned land use, and ineffective water resource management systems in the two
countries (Kenya and Tanzania).
The crosscutting values are sustaining nature and realizing social equity and human rights.
40
CHAPTER TWO: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN NATURAL
RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
41
2.1. Why Participatory Approaches
Because it seeks to involve people who will take part in and will be affected by a
project throughout the entire process, from defining the goal to evaluating the
project’s impact.
It achieve more results, more rapidly, and with greater benefit to the community as a
whole.
Communities with higher rates of citizen participation were:
much more likely to have citizen control of their governing boards,
more diverse board membership,
greater adoption of the “empowerment” approach, and as a result,
higher levels of success in attracting the resources needed to implement their plans.
42
Features of Participatory and Non-participatory
• Participatory Approaches • Non-participatory Approach
• Participation • Instruction
• Involvement • Observation
• Learning-by-doing • Teachers says
• Bottom-up
• Top-down
• Ownership
• Employment
• Empowerment
• Obedience
43
Con’t
The power of participatory approaches in people’s lives
A true community is not the same as a “group,” which can be any collection
of people, no matter how loose
50
Advantages of participatory approach
Sees people as subjects (“active agents”)
Provides a way of solving some of the problems encountered with the other
approaches.
Poor people’s views are elicited to shape plans and contribute to
developmental strategies.
Better decision making
Stronger democracy
Allows for a timely analysis and intervention
Cost-effective
51
Sustainable
2.2. Forms of Community Participation
• Those who contribute will recompensed by reduced fees & the services they receive, while
non-members pay more.
53
Con’t
Self-help projects by the whole community
• Projects in which every family in the community is expected to make a contribution.
• Food for work projects may perhaps be included here.
B. Passive Participation:
• People participate by being told what has been decided or has already happened.
• It involves unilateral announcements by an administration or project management without
any listening to people’s responses.
55
Con’t
C. Participation by consultation:
People participate by being consulted or answering questions.
External agents define problems and information gathering processes, and so control
analysis.
Such a consultative process does not concede any share in decision-making, and
professionals are under no obligation to take on board people’s views.
56
Con’t
E. Functional participation:
reduced costs.
People may participate by forming groups to meet predetermined objectives related to the
project.
Such involvement may be interactive and involve shared decision-making but tends to arise
only after major decisions have already been made by external agents.
57
Con’t
F. Interactive participation:
People participate in joint analysis, development of action plans and formation or
strengthening of local institutions.
Participation is seen as a right, not just the means to achieve project goals.
The process involves interdisciplinary methodologies that seek multiple perspectives and
make use of systemic and structured learning processes.
As groups take control over local decisions and determine how available resources are
used, so they have a stake in maintaining structures and practices.
58
Con’t
7. Self-mobilization:
People participate by taking initiatives independently of external institutions to change
systems.
They develop contacts with external institutions for resources and technical advice they
need, but retain control over how resources are used.
Self-mobilization can spread if governments and NGOs provide an enabling framework of
support.
Such self-initiated mobilization may or may not challenge existing distributions of wealth
and power.
59
2.3 Scope and Levels of participation in natural resource
management
A. Global level: used for a resources that has transboundary nature and which
require global interventions and joint efforts
B. National level: Implementation of natural resource and environment
decisions and legislations is highly dependent on the effectiveness and
efficiency of national environment institutions.
C. Local level: Implementation of natural resources management interventions
should be based on local level solutions and initiatives designed with and by
the local communities.
60
Levels of participation illustrate the so called “power” and
“powerlessness” of people.
This include eight level:
Level 1: Manipulation
Level 2: Therapy
Level 3: Informing
Level 4: Consultation
Level 5: Placation (appeasement)
Level 6: Partnership (cooperation)
Level 7: Delegated power
Level 8: Community control
61
Level 1: Manipulation
Manipulation is done in the name of participation with the
communities being treated as ordinary rubber stamps
(disapproving).
They may be made members of advisory boards where they do
not take part in actual decision making, where most decisions are
predetermined.
In this step, the power holders manage and handle the issues of the
community.
At meetings of the community, the officials educate, convince, and advise
the citizens, not the reverse.
62
Level 2: Therapy
This step is amongst the lowest in participation, with external
experts subjecting members of the local community to ‘therapy’ or
threat in which wanted or unwanted ‘expertise’ is passed on to
them.
‘The outsiders/power holders treat or make decisions about the
community without the real participation of the community.
In some respects, group therapy, masked as citizen participation.
63
Level 3: Informing
Local communities are informed their rights,
responsibilities and options that may be available.
Though this is seen as the first step in people’s
participation, there could be only one-way flow of
information.
64
Level 4: Consultation
Consulting the citizen in the decision making or planning
process.
This is, just like informing, a valid step towards full
participation.
Just by consulting the public, there is no guarantee that “citizen
concerns and ideas will be taken into account”.
Means of consultation are attitude surveys, group meetings,
contacts and informal interview.
65
Level 5: Placation (appeasement)
Some influential members of the community may be included in the
decision making process or made members of committee for
supervising the interventions.
Though this stage is at a higher step of participation than the previous
ones, the members are not accountable to other members of the
participating community.
For placation, the informing and consultation” are of course very
important.
The citizens get to advise and even to plan a great deal but it is the
power holder that makes the decision.
Thus, the needs and aspirations of downtrodden (unfairly treated
group) and marginalized classes may not be adequately taken care of.
66
Level 6: Partnership (cooperation)
Participation actually begins at this step with power being
transferred to the participating community.
The people become partners in planning and decision making
through appropriate forums.
The participating community has a major say in natural resource
management and associated interventions.
Planning and decision-making tasks are carried out through bodies
like joint policy boards, planning committees and other
mechanisms that might enforce such a partnership.
67
Level 7: Delegated power
The decision-making power being transferred delegated to a
community level organization, comprised primarily of members of
the community.
The people take all decisions concerning them with agencies
external to the rural environmental playing the role of a facilitator.
The local level institutions also implement, monitor and evaluate
the programmes.
68
Level 8: Community (citizen) control
The community or people assume full control with no
intermediaries in between.
The available funds flow to them and they implement the
interventions.
This is the highest form of authority that citizens may achieve.
This level of participation again requires citizens that are very
willing to engage themselves and spend much time and efforts in
such activities.
69
In general, when we consider grade of participation:
Manipulation and therapy are non-participation
Informing, consultation and placation are apparent or
tokenism (seeming) participation
Partnership, delegation and community control are actual
participation (citizen power)
70
Eight steps on the ladder/Levels of citizen participation 71
2.4 Participatory Natural Resources Management Projects
73
Con’t
Projects can be broken down into stages/phases (or cycle),
Each lasting from one to three years depending on the situation and type of intervention.
Each phase has its own objective and strategy.
There are six stages in PNRM. These are:
1. Identification
2. Design/Formulation
3. Appraisal
4. Proposal preparation, approval and financing
5. Implementation and monitoring
6. Evaluation
74
1. Project Identification=the 1st stage
The idea and needs of the project is part of this stage
the field and framework of intervention should first be identified
certain prerequisites checked and an institutional green light obtained
Done by means of an exploratory or fact-finding mission at
the intended site of intervention,
conducted by personnel or in some cases by a person from outside.
no binding rules with regard to the choice of person for such a mission
Terms of reference should be shared and discussed with stakeholders.
75
Con’t
Project identification includes:
Initial Review
a. Impetus for change
b. Nature of the problem
c. Stakeholder analysis
Who are the stakeholders?
What do they have at stake?
Are there gender-linked differences among and between stakeholder groups?
What are they willing to invest in change?
What benefits are they likely to realize?
d. Manner in which to proceed 76
Con’t
Situational Analysis
provides a detailed review of the context in which stakeholders operate.
The analysis is conducted at two levels:
Development context provides an overview of how a community operates,
in terms of resource base, social and institutional structures, and changes
over time
Livelihoods analysis provides a more detailed examination of how members
of the community make their living, with regard to their use of resources, use
of time, and generation of benefits.
77
Con’t
Information can be collected in a participatory manner,
In a style that is responsive to the community’s interests, and
Through a process that enables all voices in the community to be heard.
Conducting a situational analysis also offers;
flexibility
receptiveness to new and unexpected ideas
two-way flow of communication
process for empowering people in the community
information validation during the collection process
78
Con’t
Socio-economic and Gender Analysis
• Adopts a systematic approach to identifying and examining impacts of development on
different members of the community.
Principal questions addressed include:
≈ Who does what work?
≈ Who has access to, and who has control of, resources?
≈ Who has access to, and who has control of, benefits?
≈ Who participates in decision making?
Identification of Potential Projects
Review of findings
Stakeholders’ priorities for development
79
Project Design=the 2nd stage
Develops the initial project ideas from Stage I into more detailed proposals.
Project operation is demonstrated through the preparation of work plans and
personnel schedules.
The output or end result of the formulation/planning phase should be a
preliminary project design, project plan and project document
Decisions made at planning stage determine almost entirely the quality and
cost of the project, and therefore the ultimate success of a project.
Consists of time activities, normally called the ‘work breakdown structure’.
80
3. Project Appraisal= 3rd stage
Aimed to identify and design projects that have a clear foundation for success.
Used for whether to proceed to writing a proposal and seeking funding.
Represents an opportunity to improve project design prior to implementation.
Examines the information gathered during the course of the preceding steps.
Project Appraisal Criteria
Technical Social and gender Political
Financial Institutional Sustainability
Economic Environmental Risk
81
4. Proposal preparation, approval and financing=4th stage
This stage includes; finalizing proposal, approval and funding
Three fundamental questions are addressed in a project proposal, approval and financing:
a. What is the project about?
the context, process, nature, identification and design, beneficiaries of the project etc
b. How will be it operationalized?
implementing agency: goal, structure, staffing, previous experience, financial management
system, work plan, duration, personnel, other resource requirements
a. How much will it cost? How will it be financed?
financial viability
duration of project
exposure to risk
82
sustainability of benefits beyond the life of the project
5. Implementation and monitoring= 5th stage
Implementation is the execution of activities (or tasks) as set out in the operational plan.
Implementation steps:
a) Work breakdown structure
b) The scheduling framework
c) Financial administration
d) Reporting
Monitoring is the standardized measurement and observation of the project
allows continuing the strategic thinking undertaken at the planning stage and guarantees
that the project “stays on track”
allows regular assessment of work progress (action/activities) and use of resources (human,
material, financial)
83
6. Evaluation
Evaluation is an assessment, as systematic and objective as possible, of the design,
implementation and results (outputs), of an ongoing or completed project, program or
policy.
all the facts related to a specific situation are considered after which conclusions are
drawn and a judgment is made.
Subsequently, recommendations can be made for the future.
recommendations should be founded on a thorough analysis that explains the project’s
level of performance.
The assessment should be transparent, systematic and objective, or in other words, it
should be repeatable.
84
Con’t
Gender analysis involves the assessment of:
The distribution of tasks, activities, and rewards associated with the division
of labor at a particular locality or across a region;
The relative positions of women and men in terms of representation and
influence; and
The benefits and disincentives associated with the allocation of tasks to
women and men.
85
2.5. Challenges in Implementing Participatory Approaches
It does not automatically lead to consensus
People and public authorities can be cynical about the value of participation
People may only participate if they think their interests are threatened
Unrealistic expectations of what can be achieved
It may slow down the decision
It costs money, and we don’t have any
Level of citizen organization
Participatory Skills
Political will
Insufficient financial resources at the local level. 86
2.6. Commonly Used Participatory Approaches
Over the years, a large number of participatory approaches have been developed to meet the
needs of different disciplines, settings and objectives.
Five approaches deemed useful in ensuring environmental sustainability are presented:
1. Rapid Rural Appraisal(RRA)
5. Appreciative Inquiry(PI)
87
1. Rapid Rural Appraisal(RRA)
RRA is a qualitative survey methodology in which a multidisciplinary team
is used to formulate problems for agricultural research and development.
Emerged in the 1970s as a more efficient and cost-effective way for
outsiders to learn about communities, and particularly about agricultural
systems
Consists of a series of techniques for “quick and dirty” research undertaken.
88
Con’t
Theoretical Background and Guiding Principles
RRA is guided by a refined set of principles that require knowledge and skill to apply:
Optimizing trade-offs – researchers are expected to carefully balance the
quantity, relevance, accuracy and timeliness of the information acquired, as well as
optimize actual use of the data collected.
Triangulation –researcher use more than one technique/source of information to
cross-check answers and undertakes research
Learning rapidly and progressively- RRA should be conducted in a relaxed
manner that emphasizes creativity, curiosity, and conscious exploration
Learning from and with local people : this means learning directly, on-site, and
face-to-face, gaining from indigenous physical, technical and social knowledge.
89
Con’t
Techniques for Rapid Rural Appraisal: The following series of activities are used
technically
1. Selection of a multi-disciplinary research team
2. Training of research team members
3. Development of a checklist of issues to serve as the basis for questions;
4. Random selection of interviewees from various households/farmers and key
informants;
5. Recording data
6. Discussing and analyzing data with team members
7. Rapid report writing in the field
90
Con’t
Researchers may select from a variety of tools including:
Review of secondary sources, such as aerial photos;
Direct observation, foot transects, familiarization, participation in activities;
Interviews with key informants, group interviews, workshops;
Mapping, diagramming, brief aerial observation;
Biographies, local histories, case studies;
Ranking and scoring,
Time lines; and
Short simple questionnaires, towards the end of the process.
91
Advantages and disadvantages of RRA
Advantages Disadvantages
• RRA provides researchers with a quick,
• an extractive, externally-driven process.
efficient and cost-effective approach for
• The information collected is retained,
quantitative and qualitative data
collection, analysis and interpretation assessed and used by the outsiders
• Allows researchers to: use a variety of tools rather than by the individuals and
and techniques to understand a common communities involved in the research.
issue; integrate different disciplines within
• Participation” is restricted to provision
the same team; and draw information from
of information to the researcher by the
a range of people representing different
segments of a population. community.
92
2. Participatory Rural Appraisal
PRA has been defined as a family of approaches, methods and tools designed to
enable local people to formulate and analyze their situation in order to plan, act,
monitor and evaluate their actions.
Emerged in the 1980s and involves the direct participation of community members
in rural planning using different techniques such as diagrams and maps.
PRA builds on Rapid Rural Appraisal, but moves much further towards a more
holistic approach to participatory development, adding some more radical, activist
perspectives.
93
Con’t
The underlying concept is that local people are capable of analyzing their own
realities and that the outsiders
“do not dominate and lecture;
© they facilitate,
© sit down, listen and learn;
they do not transfer technology;
© they share methods which local people can use for their own appraisal,
analysis, planning action and evaluation.
In other words, external experts are “mere” facilitators of the development
process.
94
Theoretical Background and Guiding Principles
The following principles guide the implementation of PRA
Capacity building: by empowering the local community.
Utilization of results: collected data is useless unless it is utilized.
Short-cut methods: short-cut methods may yield reliable and relevant information
under time and financial constraints.
Multiple methods: inclusion of different perspectives and various methods can
help ensure that the collected information is complete and reliable.
The expertise of the non-expert: – usually local people are more knowledgeable
about their environment than the external experts.
95
Con’t
PRA’s fundamental focus knowledge is power, and shared with and owned by
local people.
The validity of local knowledge is reinforced and the monopoly on information
being held by outsiders is broken.
The PRA process transforms researchers into learners and listeners, respecting local
intellectual and analytical capabilities.
A properly implemented PRA gives enhanced attention to the inclusion of
marginal and vulnerable groups: women, children, aged and destitute and
ensuring their effective participation in development planning and
implementation.
96
Techniques for Participatory Rural Appraisal
A sample of the methods that can be used when conducting a PRA, divided into four
classes of activities:
1. Group and team dynamics methods
2. Sampling methods
3. Interviewing and dialogue methods
4. Visualization and diagramming methods
The researcher can use techniques that:
Have specific and positive impacts
Optimize cost and time
Emphasize teamwork,
97
Are systematic, to help ensure validity and reliability
Advantages and disadvantages of PRA
Advantages Disadvantages
• flexible and highly responsive to • The primary challenge of PRA is that the
individual difference, situational changes approach alone does not provide
and emerging information.
communities with decision-making authority
• mapping and calendars, are effective in
or input into project management.
encouraging participation by quieter
• be used in manner that is externally driven,
individuals, members of minority groups
• is formulaic and not responsive to or
(e.g., women), and those unable to read.
respectful of the specific context
• enable researchers to collect a large
• raises expectations that something will be
amount of information in a relatively
short period of time done to address a problem etc.,
98
3. Participatory Poverty Assessment
PPA is an iterative participatory research process that seeks to understand poverty
from the perspective of a range of stakeholders, especially the poor.
PPA is viewed as a means to:
Enhance conceptualization and understanding: of the multi-dimensional nature of
poverty and its causes.
Improve participation: providing for wider ownership and for a broader cross-
section of society (and particularly the poor)
Enhance policy effectiveness: The effectiveness of poverty reduction policies are
more likely to be enhanced
Increased local capacity: as the process enables previously disenfranchised people
99
to directly engage in analysis and monitoring of poverty and policy impacts.
Con’t
The design of a Participatory Poverty Appraisal may include:
1. Select technical assistance.
2. Identify implementation partners.
3. Identify objectives and the research agenda.
4. Identify members for the field team.
5. Identify sources of financial support.
6. Select field research sites and participants.
7. Develop a methodology for research, synthesis and analysis.
100
Con’t
Implementation of the PPA can be undertaken through a number of different activities,
including:
Gathering of existing secondary information for context, background and triangulation of
findings;
A review of existing analysis and research carried out in poor communities using
participatory approaches;
Field research in poor communities involving travelling research teams engaged in
participatory research at the community level.
Policy analysis using inputs from PPA and other sources of information and analysis to
influence policy development;
Training of NGOs, research institutes, central/local level government staff in methods and
101
4. Participatory Action Research
PAR involves bringing people from various social and political contexts and
backgrounds to identify, investigate and take appropriate action on conditions that
affect them as community members.
PAR is a continuous cycle in which insiders and outsiders together decide what
needs to be researched, design the research to be undertaken (what will be
measured and how) and collect the necessary information.
This information is then put into practical applications or used to identify new
research ideas.
PAR seeks to alter the traditional top-down approach to research by collaboratively
engaging.
102
Con’t
Theoretical Background and Guiding Principles
PAR is distinguished from all other modes of action research by its adherence to four
principles:
a. empowerment of participants
b. collaboration through participation
c. acquisition of knowledge
d. social change
The approach involves creating critical consciousness and giving participants the
skills needed to become “self-sufficient learners”.
Its primary objective is to empower disenfranchised populations through
103
Con’t
The approach is based on at least two theoretical assumptions:
1. The social construction or relativistic nature of reality; and
2. The accumulation of power by those who control the mechanisms of knowledge
creation
PAR observes that elite groups disproportionately control the mechanisms of
knowledge development, and often use this power (knowledge) to exploit or
oppress certain groups.
PAR aims to give disenfranchised groups the ability to generate knowledge and
power through research activities.
104
Con’t
PAR thus seeks to simultaneously:
a. address the practical concerns of people by solving an immediate problem &
b. be a tool for education and the development of a critical analysis of social and
economic conditions.
Techniques
1. Planning
2. Acting
3. Observing
4. Reflecting
105
5. Appreciative Inquiry
AI turns the problem-solving approach on its head by focusing on a community’s
achievements instead of its deficits.
AI has been successfully adapted as an approach to community development.
AI lets practitioners move beyond traditional problem-centered methods;
like participatory problem and needs assessment,
to identify and build on past achievements and existing strengths within a
community,
establish consensus around a shared vision of the future, and
construct strategies and partnerships to achieve that vision.
AI belief that the past successes of individuals, communities, and organizations
106
Con’t
Appreciative Inquiry (AI) is:
A positive, strength-based approach to change
Finding the best in people and the world around them
Co-creating inspiring future images
Focusing on what we want more of
Finding and unleashing the positive core
AI is an approach to organizational and social change that identifies peak
moments within a community and reinforces the conditions that make past
achievements possible.
AI has been described as: the cooperative co-evolutionary search for the best in
107
people, their organizations, and the world around them.
Con’t
It involves the discovery of what gives life to a living system when it is most
effective, alive, and constructively capable in economic, ecological and human
terms.
AI involves the art and practice of asking questions that strengthen a system’s
capacity to apprehend, anticipate, and heighten positive potential.
AI interventions focus on the speed of imagination and innovation-instead of the
negative, critical, and spiraling diagnoses commonly used in organizations.
The discovery, dream, design, and destiny model links the energy of the positive
core to changes never thought possible.
108
Theoretical Background and Guiding Principles
The application of six principles helps to explain the power behind the appreciative approach:
110
Con’t
111
Techniques
112
Con’t
113
2.7 Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring is the routine assessment of ongoing activities and
progress.
It is the systematic and continuous assessment of the progress of a
piece of work over time.
It is a basic and universal management tool for identifying
strengths and weaknesses in a programme.
Its purpose is to help all the people involved make appropriate and
timely decisions that will improve the quality of the work.
Monitoring is an on-going activity during the life of the project.
114
Evaluation determines how successful the project
has been in meeting its objectives, as well as in
assessing the impact of project activities on
desired outcomes, like knowledge or behavior.
Evaluation is the comparison of actual project
impacts against the agreed strategic plans.
It looks at what you set out to do, at what you
have accomplished, and how you accomplished it.
It can be formative (taking place during the life of
a project or organization, with the intention of
improving the strategy or way of functioning of
the project or organization).
115
It can also be summative (drawing learning’s from
a completed project or an organization that is no
longer functioning).
Evaluation focuses on measuring whether
planned outcomes and impacts have been
realized.
Therefore, it is necessary to first evaluate the
process then the output/outcomes and finally the
impact.
116
Participatory monitoring is monitoring which involves the
community in monitoring their programme activities.
117
In the monitoring process, in consultation and collaboration
with donors, the community and beneficiaries together with
implementers decide what will be monitored and how the
monitoring will be carried out.
They together analyze the information gathered through
monitoring and assess whether the project is on track in
achieving its objectives.
Participatory monitoring enables project participants
themselves to generate, analyze and use information for their
day-to-day decision-making as well as long term planning.
118
In participatory evaluation, just as in participatory monitoring,
the beneficiary community and other stakeholders together
decide how to conduct the evaluation – its timing, scope,
methodology etc.
The group also determines what they would like to find out
through evaluation;
119
If a project follows a participatory approach from
the beginning, it is easy to carry out a
participatory evaluation at the end.
If there is willingness and resources to actually do
participatory monitoring and evaluation, it would
be beneficial because one is using local people
who are in the field, doing the actual work, and
they have a stake in the outcomes.
Participatory monitoring and evaluation enables
them to shape the actual program and be involved
in its evolution.
120
This gives staff and volunteers a feeling that the
project is not simply imposed on them, but is
participatory with a joint decision making
process.
What monitoring and evaluation have in common
is that they are geared towards learning from
what you are doing and how you are doing it, by
focusing on:
Efficiency
Effectiveness
Impact
121
Efficiency tells you that the input into the work is
appropriate in terms of the output.
This could be input in terms of money, time, staff,
equipment and so on.
Effectiveness is a measure of the extent to which
a development programmes or project achieves
the specific objectives it set.
Impact tells you whether or not what you did
made a difference to the problem situation you
were trying to address.
In other words, was your strategy useful.
122
Features implied within Participatory
Monitoring and Evaluation
Participatory:
Shared learning
Joint decision-making
Co-ownership
Democratic process
Mutual respect
Empowerment
Enhanced mutual understanding
123
Monitoring:
Knowing where we are
Observing, recording change
Regular, timely assessment
Increased, jointly shared accountability
Routine reflection
Feedback
124
Evaluation:
Reflection process on what has occurred
Assessment of achievements
Impacts over a longer period
Learning from experience
Valuing change
Overall, participatory monitoring and evaluation
should serve to increase the analytical capacities
of community members, and empower them to
question, and become pro-active in development
initiatives.
125
Monitoring involves:
Establishing indicators of efficiency,
effectiveness and impact;
Setting up systems to collect information
relating to these indicators;
Collecting and recording the information;
Analyzing the information;
Using the information to inform day-to-day
management,
Monitoring is an internal function in any
project or organization.
126
Evaluation involves:
Looking at what the project or organization
intended to achieve.
– what difference did it want to make?
– what impact did it want to make?
Assessing its progress towards what it wanted to
achieve, its impact targets.
Looking at the strategy of the project or
organization.
– Did it have a strategy?
– Was it effective in following its strategy?
– Did the strategy work? If not, why not?
127
Looking at how it worked.
₋ Was there an efficient use of resources?
₋ What were the opportunity costs of the way it
chose to work?
₋ How sustainable is the way in which the project
or organization works?
₋ What are the implications for the various
stakeholders in the way the organization
works?
128
There are many different ways of doing an
evaluation.
Some of the more common are:
Self-evaluation
Interactive evaluation
Rapid Participatory Appraisal
External evaluation
Participatory evaluation
129
Participation
3.1 Concepts of Good Governance in Natural Resources
Concise Oxford Dictionary defines governance as
“the act or manner of governing; the office or function of governing”. To govern is
‘to rule or control with authority’
The process of decision-making and by which decisions are implemented (or not
implemented).
Governance comprises the institutions, processes and conventions in a society,
which determine;
how power is exercised,
how important decisions affecting society are made and
how various interests are accorded a place in such decisions.
130
Con’t
131
Con’t
It denotes the use of political authority and exercise of control in a society in relation
to the management of its resources for social and economic development.
132
3.2 Government vs. governance
Good governance ensures that political, social and economic priorities are
based on broad consensus in society and that the voices of the poorest and
the most vulnerable are heard in decision-making over the allocation of
development resources.
134
Con’t
135
Good governance has 8 major characteristics.
This means freedom of association and expression on the one hand and an
organized civil society on the other hand.
136
Rule of law
Implies equal treatment both in protection and punishment under the law for
everyone in the same way, all the time.
It also requires full protection of human rights, particularly those of minorities.
Impartial enforcement of laws requires an independent judiciary and an impartial
and incorruptible police force.
Transparency
Transparency means that decisions taken and their enforcement are done in a
manner that follows rules and regulations.
It also means that information is freely available and directly accessible to those
who will be affected by such decisions and their enforcement.
137
Responsiveness
Good governance requires that institutions and processes try to serve all
stakeholders within a reasonable timeframe.
Consensus oriented
139
Accountability
The requirement to accept responsibility and answer for actions
governmental institutions, the private sector and civil society organizations
must be accountable to the public and to their institutional stakeholders.
Who is accountable to whom varies depending on whether decisions or actions
taken are internal or external to an organization or institution.
In general, an organization or an institution is accountable to those who will be
affected by its decisions or actions.
Accountability cannot be enforced without transparency and the rule of law
140
141
3.3 Governance & sustainable human development:
142
Cont...
143
Cont..
Equity - The expansion of capabilities and opportunities means more than income
it also means equity, such as an educational system to which everybody should have
access
Sustainability - The needs of this generation must be met without compromising
the right of future generations to be free of poverty and deprivation and to exercise
their basic capabilities.
Security - Particularly the security of livelihood. People need to be freed from
threats, such as disease or repression and from sudden harmful disruptions in their
lives
144
Cont...
145
3.4 The Concept of Natural Resource Governance
NRG is defined as the rules and regulations that determine (or govern) natural
resource use and the way these rules and regulations are developed and enforced.
Natural Resource Governance refers to the processes of decision making involved in
the control and management of environment and natural resources.
It is about relationships & who has the power and responsibility to make and
implement decisions.
Improving management, reducing threats, and meeting conservation
objectives over the long term requires good governance
146
Con’t
The initial scale and scope of natural resources governance depend on factors
such as
the natural resources involved,
the legal framework for participation and
the willingness of key stakeholders to participate.
Effective NRG requires democratic and mutually supportive central and local
governance institutions.
PNRG needs decentralization;
Involves the transfer of powers from the central government to lower level actors
and institutions and
Democracy 147
How Does NR Governance Differ from NRM?
NRG is the processes of decision making involved in the control and management
of environment and natural resources.
while
NRM is the implementation of rules and regulations defined by a governance body
or group.
NR “governors” are those individuals or groups that establish, and are accountable
for, the implementation of NR access and use policies and norms (institutions).
And “managers” are those individuals or groups that are responsible for executing
the policies, rules, and regulations (institutions) established by the “governors.”
148
Con’t
149
Con’t
150
Con’t
if it does not have the political, economic, or policing power to exert its
authority, it will be unable to govern effectively.
152
3.5 Principles of Natural Resources
Governance
1. Legitimacy
Legitimacy is the acceptance and justification of shared rule by a
community
Legitimacy refers to:
The validity of an organization’s authority to govern that may be
conferred by democratic statute or earned through the acceptance
by stakeholders of an organization’s authority to govern
Power has been devolved to the lowest level at which it can be
effectively exercised;
The integrity with which this authority is exercised.
153
Con’t
2. Transparency
Transparency refers to:
the visibility of decision-making processes;
the clarity with which the reasoning behind decisions is
communicated
the ready availability of relevant information about governance
and performance in an organization.
All decisions about natural resources management priorities and
investments should be accessible to stakeholders.
Transparency is required in who has made a decision; the means
by which it has been reached and its justification. 154
Con’t
3. Accountability
Accountability refers to
the allocation and acceptance of responsibility for decisions and
actions and
the demonstration of whether and how these responsibilities
have been met.
Accountability is an issue for governance in contexts where the
effectiveness of decision-making processes is essential for their
authority and credibility.
155
Con’t
4. Inclusiveness
Inclusiveness refers to opportunities available for stakeholders to
participate in and influence decision-making processes and
actions.
Governance is regarded as inclusive when all those with a stake in
governance processes can engage with them on a basis equal to
that provided to all other stakeholders.
Inclusiveness also implies that governing natural resources
management bodies actively and effectively engage their key
stakeholders through targeted participation processes, and by
maintaining ongoing dialogue with them. 156
Con’t
5. Fairness
Fairness refers to:
the respect and attention given to stakeholders’ views;
consistency and absence of personal bias in decision making; and
the consideration given to distribution of costs and benefits of
decisions.
To assist fairness, governing natural resources management
bodies can employ a range of participation mechanisms
appropriate to stakeholders’ specific cultural and communication
preferences.
Treating stakeholders with respect and supporting their dignity is
157
both a moral obligation and fosters acceptance of outcomes.
Con’t
6. Integration
Integration refers to
the connection between, and coordination across, different governance levels;
the connection between, and coordination across, organizations at the same level
of governance; and
the alignment of priorities, plans and activities across governance organizations.
158
Con’t
7. Capability
Capability refers to the systems, plans, resources, skills, leadership, knowledge
and experiences that enable organizations, and the individuals who direct,
manage and work for them, to effectively deliver on their responsibilities.
Effective implementation is influenced by
executive skills and leadership;
skills and competence of staff (technical, financial and management);
availability of training;
knowledge;
organizational maturity;
funding availability and continuity; and succession planning.
159
Con’t
8. Adaptability
Adaptability refers to:
the incorporation of new knowledge and learning into decision-making
and implementation;
anticipation and management of threats, opportunities and associated
risks; and
systematic reflection on individual, organizational and system
performance.
Adaptability demands that a governing body is able to rearrange its
internal processes and procedures in response to changing internal or
160
Chapter 4. COMPETITION AND CONFLICTS OVER NATURAL RESOURCES
• Ethnic polarization,
• High levels of inequity,
• Poverty,
• Injustice and
• Poor governance.
163
Con’t
Conflict is generally understood as a social phenomenon which results
from the differences in the social circumstances and/or disparate interests
of at least two parties (individuals, groups, states, etc).
A conflict is not necessarily violent
The conflict often occurs during a change.
Some want change, while others oppose it.
If their disagreement or conflict is addressed peacefully, the process can
be positive.
But when the conflict is not managed properly, it becomes violent.
164
Con’t
Conflict is often the result of incompatible needs, goals, or
aspirations.
Needs such as: food, shelter, health, safety, freedom and justice might
be threatened or perceived to be threatened.
Conflict is a natural and necessary part of our lives
Conflict may occur;
at home with our families
at work with colleagues or
in negotiations between governments
Conflict is both the force that can tear relationships apart and the
force that binds them together.
165
Con’t
4.2 Origin of conflict
In most cases conflict is as a result of the following:
Different perception
Different behaviors or attitudes
Poor distribution of resources
Lack of basic human needs or their frustration
Different interests
Ideological differences based on religion or political parties
166
Con’t
4.3 Functions of conflict
Conflict helps establish our identity and independence:
Intensity of conflict demonstrates the closeness and importance of
relationships:
Conflict can build new relationships
Conflict can create coalitions
Conflict serves as a safety-valve mechanism which helps to sustain
relationships:
Conflict helps parties assess each other’s power and can work to
redistribute power in a system of conflict: etc
167
Con’t
4.4 Characteristics of Conflict
Conflict is not automatically a bad thing.
Constructive processing of differences can produce high quality
decisions, encourage growth and strengthen groups/individuals.
Destructive conflict can result in poor quality decisions, discourage
learning and cause ongoing harm to groups/individuals.
Characteristics of Constructive Conflict
Affirms differences and sees their potential for enriching outcomes.
Participatory – win/win; shared power; focused on group/common
interest; safe.
168
Con’t
170
Con’t
Uneven/unequal information – work from stereotypes/assumptions rather than
information; undercurrents/hidden agendas; disinterested in fair outcomes.
Little or no personal responsibility for process; winner takes all
4.5 Consequences of Conflict
Increase costs (time, money) devoted to dealing with the conflict
Waste of resources and energy spent dealing with the conflict
Decrease productivity
Lower motivation
Decrease morale
Poor decision-making
171
Con’t
Withdrawal and miscommunication or non-communication
Complaints and blaming
Backstabbing and gossip
Attitudes of distrust and hostility (that may influence all future
interactions
Erosion to personal, work, and community relationships
Harm to others not directly involved in the conflict
Damage emotional and psychological well-being of those involved in the
conflict
172
Dissatisfaction and stress
4.6 Approaches to Conflict
Over the centuries conflict has been approached in a variety of
ways.
Even today conflict tends to be resolved using these same basic
strategies.
These strategies include:
Power
force and knowledge
the ‘strongest’ usually wins
the one with the most resources often wins
Rights
standards of fairness or behavior
Interests
underlying needs, desires, concerns, fears, hopes often at the
root of the visible conflict
the underlying interests of both parties inform the final agreed
upon resolution 173
4.7 Conflict dynamics
Conflict is dynamic and unpredictable
It rarely reveals neatly with a defined beginning, middle and end
Aspects of the different stages of conflict are often present
concurrently
Therefore, conflict can vary in form, intensity, location, by actors
and, over time
Conflicts are best thought of as dynamic (ever-changing),
interactive social processes
Conflict can emerge gradually and steadily, or develop rapidly in
response to a few significant events
Ideally, conflicts should be managed at the latent stage, before
they emerge or escalate.
174
Fig. Conflict dynamics/stages
175
4.8. Conducting Conflict Assessment
Conflict assessments are diagnostic tools that are designed to
help:
a. Identify and prioritize the causes and consequences of
conflict
b. Understand how existing development programs interact
with factors linked to conflict
c. Determine where development and humanitarian
assistance can most effectively support local efforts to
manage conflict and build peace
176
Conflict assessments are meant to provide a broad overview of
destabilizing patterns and trends in a society.
Conflict assessments typically include six steps:
1. Decides to initiate
2. Initiates the conflict assessment
3. Gathers information
4. Analyzes
5. Designs a joint problem-solving process
6. Shares the assessment
177
Step 1: Decide to Initiate a Conflict Assessment
A convener should begin a conflict assessment process by
retaining a credible and qualified assessor.
the assessor be perceived by all parties in the conflict as
impartial and not having a stake in the conflict.
the convener should provide the assessor with a preliminary
list of likely stakeholder.
the convener should draft a letter to stakeholders that
introduces the assessor.
178
Step 2: Initiate a Conflict Assessment
It include the following questions:
What is the history of this situation?
What issues relating to the situation are important to you and
why?
What other individuals or organizations have a stake in the
situation?
What are the interests and concerns of those individuals or
organizations, as you see them?
Would you are willing to work with other stakeholders to
develop a consensus-based solution to this situation?
179
Step 3: Gather Information through Interviews
Stakeholders interviewed in person, individually.
The eye-to-eye contact possible in an in-person interview is
important for both gathering accurate information and building
rapport.
The assessor should be sure to write down the answers to the
main questions:
what are your main concerns?
who are the other key players?
180
And others such as:
the interviewee’s exact involvement in the conflict
what the interviewee thinks of the other parties
what the interviewee doesn’t think is important
the names and organizational affiliations of people
mentioned by the interviewee
whether or not the interviewee thinks the media are
interested in the issues
concerns expressed about the convener or the assessment
process
181
Step 4: Analyze the Interview Results
By the time the interviews are complete, the
assessor should have a good idea of who the
central players are, what concerns them, and
whether or not mediation is likely to succeed.
This includes:
Summarize the Findings
Map Areas of Agreement and Disagreement
Assess the Feasibility of a Mediation Process
182
Step 5: Design a Joint Problem-Solving Process
If a consensus-based process appears feasible,
the assessor needs to draft a preliminary
process design.
The assessor should make design
recommendations regarding:
the goals of the mediation,
the issues to be discussed,
selection of the appropriate stakeholder
representatives,
the time frame and schedule for meetings,
ground rules,
the relationship of the process to other
decision-making efforts,
funding
183
Step 6: Share the Assessment with
Interviewees
The analysis of the interview results and the
proposed process design should be presented
to the convener and the interviewees in a
written conflict assessment report.
The report should include the following:
Introduction
Findings
Analysis
List of Interviewees
Recommendations
184
4.9. Conflict Prevention and Conflict Resolution Strategies
Conflict prevention means to anticipate problems ahead of
their happening, and the capacity to prevent it from
escalation.
It requires taking early proposals, instituting commission of
inquiry, investigations, proper distribution of resources, and
respect for the rule of law and human rights.
Conflict prevention is often divided into two categories: direct
prevention and structural prevention.
186
Listen without interrupting; ask for feedback
Remember, when only one person’s needs are satisfied in a
conflict, it is not resolved and will continue
Forget the past and stay in the present
Build ‘power with’ not ‘power over’ others
Thank the person for listening
187
Chapter 5 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
189
Characteristics of ADR
Informality
Application of Equity
Direct Participation and Communication between Disputants
191
Positional and interest based negotiation
1.Positional Negotiation
Positional negotiation is a bargaining strategy in which a series of
positions and alternative solutions that meet particular interests
or needs are selected by a negotiator, ordered sequentially
according to preferred outcomes and presented to another party
to reach an agreement.
In the case of Positional Bargaining the parties hold defined
viewpoints (positions).
The negotiation process is based on forcing mutual compromises.
Positional negotiations start with parties making an offer which
will maximize their benefit
Each party then attempts to draw the other into their bargaining
range by using a series of counter-offers and concession.
192
2. Interest-based negotiation
Interest-based negotiation is designed for parties who have a need to
create or maintain healthy relationships
In this type of process, parties discuss the issues that face them and
express the interests, values and needs
This cooperative process focuses parties away from their positions and
onto using interests and objective criteria for making decisions
A party’s basic needs, wants, and motivations are commonly referred to
as its interests
Interests are the fundamental drivers of negotiation
People negotiate because they are hoping to satisfy their interests
better through an agreement
The measure of success in negotiation is how well your interests are
met
193
Hard and Soft Positional Bargaining
In Soft Positional Bargaining
Participants are friends
The goal is agreement
Make concessions to cultivate the relationship
Soft on the people and the problem
Trust others
Change your position easily
Make threats
Disclose your bottom line
Accept one-sided losses to reach agreement
Search for the single answer: the one they will accept
Insist on agreement
Try to avoid a contest of will
Yield pressure
194
In Hard Positional Bargaining
Participants are adversaries
The goal is victory
Demand concessions as a condition of the relationship
Hard on the problem and the people
Distrust others
Dig in to your position
Make offers
Mislead as to your bottom line
Demand one-sided gains as the price of agreement
Search for the single answer: the one you will accept.
Insist on position
Try to win a contest of will
Apply pressure
195
Approches to NRM
• Adaptive management: The iterative
and systematic process of learning
from ongoing resource management
results and outcomes to improve
approaches and management
decisions.
196
197