0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views16 pages

BVRT

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 16

BENTON VISUAL RETENTION

TEST (BVRT)
1. Introduction
2. Purpose/Applicability
3. Instructions
4. Types of Administration
5. Scoring
6. Diagnostic Interpretations
7. reporting
2
INTRODUCTION

• The Benton Visual Retention Test (BVRT) is a neuropsychological assessment tool developed by Arthur

Benton, a renowned US neuropsychologist, and revised by Syvan.

• First published in 1946, it is currently in its 5th edition.

• The primary objective of the BVRT is to measure visual perception, visual memory, and visual construction

abilities.

• The test comprises sets of designs that the examinee reproduces, with variations in exposure time to assess

different aspects of visual memory.

3
Introduction…
• Scoring involves evaluating the accuracy of reproductions as well as identifying

specific types of errors made by the examinee.

• Interpretation of test results considers factors such as brain injury, psychiatric

conditions, and intellectual abilities.

• The BVRT serves as a valuable tool for diagnosing learning disabilities, degenerative

brain diseases, and evaluating cognitive functioning across diverse populations.


4
PURPOSE/APPLICABILITY
Clinical Assessment Screening Tool Screening and Monitoring

BVRT is utilized by clinicians As a quick measure, BVRT As a rapid assessment


to identify and evaluate aids clinicians in screening tool, the BVRT facilitates
memory deficits, spatial for both obvious and subtle the screening of cognitive
orientation difficulties, and impairments in visual impairments in clinical
motor behaviour memory and cognitive settings. Additionally, it
impairments in individuals functioning. It provides allows for longitudinal
with psychiatric or valuable insights into monitoring of patients'
neurological conditions. It patients' cognitive abilities cognitive progress over
helps in diagnosing and and helps in determining time, aiding in treatment
monitoring conditions such appropriate interventions
planning and intervention
as traumatic brain injuries, and treatment plans.
dementia, learning
adjustments.
disabilities, and
developmental disorders.
5
PURPOSE/APPLICABILITY
Research Tool Educational Assessment Normative Comparison

Within research contexts, the In educational settings, the The test provides normative
BVRT contributes to advancing BVRT assists educators in data for different age groups
identifying students with and intelligence levels,
knowledge in cognitive
specific cognitive challenges, allowing psychologists to
psychology, providing such as visual memory deficits compare individual
researchers with a standardized or spatial orientation performances against
measure to investigate visual difficulties. This enables the standardized benchmarks.
cognition, memory processes, development of tailored This aids in interpreting test
and motor behaviour across educational interventions to results and making informed
support students' learning clinical decisions.
diverse populations. It supports
needs.
studies on cognitive
development, aging, and the
effects of neurological
conditions. 6
INSTRUCTIONS
• Materials Needed:

1. BVRT booklet containing blank pages for reproducing designs.

2. Pencil and eraser.

3. Timer or stopwatch (optional).

• The Benton Visual Retention Test comprises three sets or forms: Forms C, D,
and E. Each set contains 10 designs measuring 8.5 × 5.5 inches.
• These designs evaluate the examinee’s visual and memory abilities.
Additionally, alternate designs are available for repeated testing.
• The examinee receives a booklet with 10 blank pages to reproduce the
designs.
7
TYPES OF ADMINISTRATION
There are five different methods of administering the test, each tailored to provide valuable
insights into the examinee's cognitive functioning.

ADMINISTRATION The examinee views each design for 10 seconds before reproducing it.
A
ADMINISTRATION The examinee views each design for 5 seconds before reproducing
B
ADMINISTRATION The examinee views each design and reproduces it while viewing it for an
C indefinite amount of time.

ADMINISTRATION The examinee views each design for 10 seconds, then waits 15 seconds
D before reproduction begins.

ADMINISTRATION The examinee views each design for 10 seconds, then chooses the correct
M design from a multiple-choice display of four options.
In all methods except for Administration C, the original design is hidden before
reproduction begins.
8
THE TWO SCORING SYSTEM

Two scoring systems are available for the evaluation of subject’s performance.

1. Number of Correct Reproductions 2. Error Scores

• Provides a measure of general • Takes account of the specific types


efficiency of performance. of errors.

• Each design is judges on an all-or- • Error score system classifies errors


into 6 major types i.e., omissions,
none basis and given a score of 1 or distortions, perseverations
0. rotations, misplacement, and size
errors.
• Range of possible score for any
single form is 0 to 10.
9
TYPES OF ERRORS

• Omissions (Omitting or incomplete reproductions)


• Distortions (Inaccuracy by substitution)
• Perseverations (Substitutive or additive response consisting of
figure present in preceding design)
• Rotation (A plan rotation of 180, 45, or 90 degree of the single
major figure)
• Misplacement (Distortion of spatial relationship between the
figures of a design).
• Size Errors (Distortions in relative size)

10
ABBREVIATIONS USED WHILE ERROR SCORING

• These above abbreviations are replaced with the first words of errors like for perseveration PerM,
PerMR etc. can be used, for Rotation, 90MR, 180ML, 45PL etc. can be used so these abbreviations
can be modified while scoring.

11
QUANTITATIVE METHOD OF SCORING
All the correct scores and error scores are added and they are checked in their normative
tables.
• Administration A: In adult norms, interpretation of performance is made on the basis of an
expected score appropriate for his age and his assumed IQ level. In children norms,
interpretation is based on a comparison of observed and expected performance.
• Administration B: Performance on administration B is checked in the tables for
administration A by subtracting 1 from the scores.
• Administration C: Performance is checked in its normative tables.
• Administration D: Standardized data gathered on this procedure is not yet sufficient to
provide adequate norms for clinical use. Qualitative analysis is mostly used for this purpose.
12
QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE

• Omission of peripheral figure: Lack of awareness or perception of


peripheral figures indicates brain deficits, possibly in parieto-occipital
areas.
• Unilateral errors: Deficits in lateral brain areas lead to unilateral
omission, distortion, or misplacement of peripheral figures
• Rotations: Rotational errors, like mirror-imaging or 90-degrees rotations,
are common in brain diseased patients.
• Mental Defectives: Both Adults and children with mental defects perform
according to their mental age rather than chronological age

13
DIAGNOSTIC INTERPRETATIONS

FEATURES INDICATIONS

Lack of adequate effort Hostile, apathetic, asocial, or paranoid


patients
Inability to complete reproductions, Severely depressed patients or serious
particularly of the more complex physical diseases
designs
Irrelevant reproductions Autistic preoccupation, schizophrenia

Defective graph motor skills and poor Lack of education or relevant social
task adjustment experience
Defective performance Persons stimulating mental
incompetence
14
REPORTING
DOCUMENTATION COMMUNICATION INTERPRETATION

• The test results should be • Summary of patient’s • Results are interpreted in


documented in the subject’s conjunction with other
performance is reported,
clinical record. assessment measures and
highlighting any significant
• Date of administration and clinical observations.
strengths or weaknesses.
any relevant demographic
information is included.
• Total score is included and • Patient’s history,
• Raw scores as well as total
interpreted in the context of presenting concerns, and
scores are recorded (for
both, number of correct normative data for the any other relevant
reproductions, and error subject’s age and gender. information are
scores) considered.
15

You might also like