0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views31 pages

Chap 014 CH

There are several ways for firms to enter foreign markets including exporting, licensing, franchising, joint ventures, and wholly owned subsidiaries. Each entry mode has advantages and disadvantages related to costs, risks, and level of control. Firms must evaluate factors like trade barriers, political risks, and strategic objectives to determine the best entry mode for their needs.

Uploaded by

shihabsince99
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views31 pages

Chap 014 CH

There are several ways for firms to enter foreign markets including exporting, licensing, franchising, joint ventures, and wholly owned subsidiaries. Each entry mode has advantages and disadvantages related to costs, risks, and level of control. Firms must evaluate factors like trade barriers, political risks, and strategic objectives to determine the best entry mode for their needs.

Uploaded by

shihabsince99
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 31

Chapter 14

Entry Strategy and


Strategic Alliances

12-1
Introduction

Question: How can firms enter foreign markets?


 Firms can enter foreign markets through
exporting
licensing or franchising to host country firms
a joint venture with a host country firm
a wholly owned subsidiary in the host country to serve
that market
 The advantages and disadvantages of each entry mode
are determined by
transport costs and trade barriers
political and economic risks
firm strategy

12-2
Basic Entry Decisions

Question: What are the basic entry decisions for firms


expanding internationally?

Answer:
 A firm expanding internationally must decide
which markets to enter
when to enter them and on what scale
how to enter them (the choice of entry mode)

12-3
Which Foreign Markets?

 Firms need to assess the long run profit potential of each


market
 The most favorable markets are politically stable
developed and developing nations with free market
systems, low inflation, and low private sector debt
 The less desirable markets are politically unstable
developing nations with mixed or command economies,
or developing nations where speculative financial
bubbles have led to excess borrowing
 Successful firms usually offer products that have not
been widely available in the market and that satisfy an
unmet need

12-4
Timing of Entry

 After a firm identifies which market to enter, it must


determine the timing of entry
 Entry is early when an international business enters a
foreign market before other foreign firms
 Entry is late when a firm enters after other international
businesses have already established themselves in the
market

12-5
Timing of Entry

 Firms entering a market early can gain first mover


advantages including
the ability to pre-empt rivals and capture demand by
establishing a strong brand name
the ability to build up sales volume in that country and
ride down the experience curve ahead of rivals and
gain a cost advantage over later entrants
the ability to create switching costs that tie customers
into their products or services making it difficult for
later entrants to win business

12-6
Timing of Entry

 First mover disadvantages - the disadvantages


associated with entering a foreign market before other
international businesses
 These may result in pioneering costs (costs that an early
entrant has to bear that a later entrant can avoid) such
as
the costs of business failure if the firm, due to its
ignorance of the foreign environment, makes some
major mistakes
the costs of promoting and establishing a product
offering, including the cost of educating the customers

12-7
Scale of Entry

 Firms that enter foreign markets on a significant scale


make a major strategic commitment that changes the
competitive playing field
involves decisions that have a long term impact and
are difficult to reverse
 Small-scale entry can be attractive because it allows the
firm to learn about a foreign market, but at the same time
it limits the firm’s exposure to that market

12-8
Summary

 There are no “right” decisions with foreign market entry,


just decisions that are associated with different levels of
risk and reward
 Firms in developing countries can learn from the
experiences of firms in developed countries

12-9
Entry Modes

Question: What is the best way to enter a foreign market?

Answer:
 Firms can enter foreign market through
1. Exporting
2. Turnkey projects
3. Licensing
4. Franchising
5. Joint ventures
6. Wholly owned subsidiaries
 Each mode has advantages and disadvantages

12-10
Exporting

1. Exporting is often the first method firms use to enter


foreign market
 Exporting is attractive because(Advantages)
it is relatively low cost
firms may achieve experience curve economies
 Exporting is not attractive when (Disadvantages)
lower-cost manufacturing locations exist
transport costs are high
tariff barriers are high
foreign agents fail to in the exporter’s best interest

12-11
Turnkey Projects

2. Turnkey projects involve a contractor that agrees to


handle every detail of the project for a foreign client,
including the training of operating personnel
at completion of the contract, the foreign client is
handed the "key" to a plant that is ready for full
operation

12-12
Turnkey Projects

 Turnkey projects are attractive because


they allow firms to earn great economic returns from the
know-how required to assemble and run a technologically
complex process
they are less risky in countries where the political and
economic environment is such that a longer-term
investment might expose the firm to unacceptable
political and/or economic risk
 Turnkey projects are not attractive when
the firm's process technology is a source of competitive
advantage
No long term interest in the foreign market
Creating competitor and competing themselves in the
world market.
12-13
Licensing
3. Licensing - an arrangement whereby a licensor grants
the rights to intangible property to another entity (the
licensee) for a specified time period, and in return, the
licensor receives a royalty fee from the licensee
intangible property includes patents, inventions,
formulas, processes, designs, copyrights, and
trademarks
 Licensing is attractive when
the firm does not have to bear the development costs
and risks associated with opening a foreign market
the firm avoids barriers to investment
it allows a firm with intangible property that might
have business applications, but which doesn’t want to
develop those applications itself, to capitalize on
market opportunities
12-14
Licensing

 Licensing is unattractive when


the firm doesn’t have the tight control over
manufacturing, marketing, and strategy necessary to
realize experience curve and location economies
the firm’s ability to coordinate strategic moves across
countries by using profits earned in one country to
support competitive attacks in another is
compromised
 There is the potential for loss of proprietary (or
intangible) technology or property
to reduce this risk, firms can use cross-licensing
agreements or link the agreement with the decision to
form a joint venture
12-15
Franchising
4. Franchising - a form of licensing in which the franchisor
sells intangible property and requires the franchisee
agree to abide by strict rules as to how it does business
 Franchising is attractive because
can avoid costs and risks of opening up a foreign
market
 Franchising is unattractive because
it may inhibit the firm's ability to take profits out of one
country to support competitive attacks in another
the geographic distance of the firm from its foreign
franchisees can make poor quality difficult for the
franchisor to detect
12-16
Joint Ventures
5. Joint ventures involve the establishment of a firm that is
jointly owned by two or more otherwise independent
firms
 Joint ventures are attractive because
a firm can benefit from a local partner's knowledge of
the host country's competitive conditions, culture,
language, political systems, and business systems
the costs and risks of opening a foreign market are
shared with the partner
they can help firms avoid the risk of nationalization or
other adverse government interference

12-17
Joint Ventures

 Joint ventures can be unattractive because


the firm risks giving control of its technology to its
partner
the firm may not have the tight control over
subsidiaries that it might need to realize experience
curve or location economies
shared ownership can lead to conflicts and battles for
control if goals and objectives differ or change over
time

12-18
Wholly Owned Subsidiaries

6. Wholly owned subsidiaries involve 100 percent


ownership of the stock of the subsidiary
 Firms establishing a wholly owned subsidiary can
set up a new operation in that country
acquire an established firm

12-19
Wholly Owned Subsidiaries

 Wholly owned subsidiaries are attractive because


they reduce the risk of losing control over core
competencies
they gives the firm the tight control over operations in
different countries that is necessary for engaging in
global strategic coordination
they may be required if a firm is trying to realize
location and experience curve economies
 Wholly owned subsidiaries are unattractive because
firms bear the full costs and risks of setting up overseas
operations

12-20
Selecting an Entry Mode
Table 12.1: Advantages and Disadvantages of
Entry Modes

12-21
Selecting an Entry Mode

Question: How should a firm choose a specific entry


mode?

Answer:
 All entry modes have advantages and disadvantages
 The optimal choice of entry mode involves trade-offs

12-22
Core Competencies and Entry Mode

 The optimal entry mode depends to some degree on


the nature of a firm’s core competencies
 Core competencies can involve
1. technological know-how
2. management know-how

12-23
Core Competencies and Entry Mode

1. Technological Know-How
 When competitive advantage is based on proprietary
technological know-how, firms should avoid licensing
and joint venture arrangements in order to minimize
the risk of losing control over the technology
 However, if a technological advantage is only transitory
(Impermanent), or the firm can establish its technology
as the dominant design in the industry, then licensing
may be attractive

12-24
Core Competencies and Entry Mode

2. Management Know-How
 The competitive advantage of many service firms is
based upon management know-how
 international trademark laws are generally effective
for protecting trademarks
 Since the risk of losing control over management skills
to franchisees or joint venture partners is not high, the
benefits from getting greater use of brand names is
significant

12-25
Pressures for Cost Reductions

 Firms facing strong pressures for cost reductions are


likely to pursue some combination of exporting and
wholly owned subsidiaries
this will allow the firms to achieve location and scale
economies as well as retain some degree of control
over worldwide product manufacturing and distribution

12-26
Greenfield or Acquisition?

Question: Should a firm establish a wholly owned


subsidiary in a country by building a subsidiary from the
ground up (greenfield strategy), or by acquiring an
established enterprise in the target market (acquisition
strategy)?

Answer:
 The number of cross border acquisitions are increasing
 Over the last decade, 40-80 percent of all FDI inflows
have been mergers and acquisitions

12-27
Pros and Cons of Acquisitions

 Acquisitions
are quick to execute
enable firms to preempt their competitors
can be less risky than green-field ventures
 However, many acquisitions are not successful

12-28
Pros and Cons of Acquisitions

Question: Why do acquisitions fail?

Answer:
 Acquisitions fail when
the firm overpays for the assets of the acquired firm
there is a clash between the cultures of the acquiring
and acquired firm
attempts to realize synergies by integrating the
operations of the acquired and acquiring entities run
into roadblocks and take much longer than forecast
there is inadequate pre-acquisition screening

12-29
Pros and Cons of Acquisitions

Question: How can firms reduce the problems associated


with acquisitions?

Answer:
 Firms can reduce the problems associated with
acquisitions
through careful screening of the firm to be acquired
by moving rapidly once the firm is acquired to
implement an integration plan

12-30
Pros and Cons of Greenfield Ventures

Question: Why are greenfield ventures attractive?

Answer:
 Greenfield ventures are attractive because they allow the
firm to build the kind of subsidiary company that it wants
 However, greenfield ventures
are slower to establish
are risky because they have no proven track record
can be problematic if a competitor enters via
acquisition and quickly builds market share

12-31

You might also like