RM Unit 1 - (Ajs)
RM Unit 1 - (Ajs)
1
Unit I
• Meaning of Research Problem
• Sources of Research Problem
• Criteria Characteristics of a good Research Problem
• Errors in selecting a Research Problem
• Scope and Objectives of Research Problem
• Approaches of investigation of solutions for Research
Problem
• Data collection
• Analysis
• Interpretation
• Necessary instrumentations
• Validate intuition
• Improve methods
• For publication
Motivation for Research Study
What makes people to undertake research? This is a question of
fundamental importance. The possible motives for doing research
may be either one or more of the following:
Desire to:
get a research degree along with its consequential
benefits;
face the challenge in solving the unsolved problems, i.e.,
concern over practical problems initiates research;
get intellectual joy of doing some creative work;
be of service to society;
get respectability.
What is Research?
• A systematic means of problem solving
(Tuckman 1978)
• 5 key characteristics:
8
Research is not
Accidental discovery :
9
Research is not … cont.
Data Collection
10
Research is not … cont.
Searching out published research results in
libraries (or the internet)
11
Research is…
1. Searching for explanation of events,
phenomena, relationships and causes
– What, how and why things occur
– Are there interactions?
2. A process
– Planned and managed – to make the information
generated credible
– The process is creative
– It is circular – always leads to more questions
12
• All well designed and conducted research has
potential application.
• Failure to see applications can be due to:
– Users not trained or experienced in the specialized
methods of economic research and reasoning
– Researchers often do not provide adequate
interpretations and guidance on applications of
the research
• Researchers are responsible to help users
understand research implications
(How?)
13
Scope and Objectives of Research
Problem
Research Objectives are the specific components of the
research problem, that you’ll be working to answer or
complete, in order to answer the overall research
problem. - Churchill, 2001
3. Most of the business units in our country do not have the confidence that the
material supplied by them to researchers will not be misused and as such they are
often reluctant in supplying the needed information to researchers.
4. Research studies overlapping one another are undertaken quite often for want
of adequate information. This results in duplication and fritters away resources.
5. There does not exist a code of conduct for researchers and inter-university and
interdepartmental rivalries are also quite common.
Cont..
6. Many researchers in our country also face the difficulty of
adequate and timely secretarial assistance, including computerial
assistance.
8. There is also the problem that many of our libraries are not able to get
copies of old and new Acts/Rules, reports and other government
publications in time.
10. There may, at times, take place the problem of conceptualization and
also problems relating to the process of data collection and related things.
Errors in selecting a Research
Problem
Uncontrollable variables
Human tendencies
Time and money
Lack of computerization
Insufficient interaction between university research
departments and business establishments
Lack of confidence on the part of business units to give
information
Aims of Research Methodology
• To gain familiarity with a phenomenon or to achieve new
insights into it. (studies with this object in view are termed as
exploratory or formulate research studies);
• To portray accurately the characteristics of a particular
individual, situation or a group.(studies with this object in view
are known as descriptive research studies);
• To determine the frequency with which something occurs or with
which it is associated with something else (studies with this
object in view are known as diagnostic research studies);
• To test a hypothesis of a causal relationship between variables
(such studies are known as hypothesis-testing research studies).
TYPES OF RESEARCH
Types of research can be classified in many different ways.
Descriptive versus Analytical Research
Applied versus Fundamental Research
Qualitative versus Quantitative Research
Conceptual versus Empirical Research
27
Quantitative v/s Qualitative
Quantitative Research Strategy Qualitative Research Strategy
•Investigation aims to assess a pre- •Investigation aims to create a novel
stated theory (Deductive Reasoning) theory (Inductive Reasoning)
•Often involves hypothesis testing •Researcher becomes an inherent part
of the study - ethnography
•Attempts to minimise the influence
of the researcher on the outcome •Qualitative data infers complex
•Quantitative data infers statistics statements or opinions
•Data collection therefore permits
•Data collection therefore requires
‘open’ responses
‘closed’ responses
Conceptual v/s Empirical Research
• Conceptual Research – related to abstract
ideas or theory.
– Used by philosophers and thinkers to develop new
concept or to reinterpret existing ones.
• Empirical Research (experimental) – is data-
based research resulting is conclusions that
can be verified by observations or
experiments.
29
Other types of Research
Following are variations of above types of
research:
•One time or longitudinal
•Field setting or laboratory or simulation
•Clinical or diagnostic (case study based)
•Exploratory (development of hypothesis) or formalized
(testing of hypothesis)
•Historical (using documents or remains)
•Conclusion and decision-oriented
30
Sources of Research Problems
Identifying
Needs Collecting
and...
Driving
Decisions ...Analyzing
the data
Delivering
Conclusions
34
The Process of Research
• The process is initiated with a question or
problem (step 1)
• Next, goals and objectives are formulated to
deal with the question or problem (step 2)
• Then the research design is developed to
achieve the objectives (step 3)
• Results are generated by conducting the
research (step 4)
• Interpretation and analysis of results follow
(step 5)
35
The Process of Research
36
Research Problem
37
Research v/s Decision Problems
• Research problems and decision problems may
be closely related, especially in subject-matter
or problem-solving research.
• Also, decision (subject-matter) problems and
action problems usually go together – we make
a decision, then act on it.
• Disciplinary research however, may not lead to
a specific decision or action. Disciplinary
problems are of interest within the discipline
and are oriented to the generation of
knowledge.
38
• When research does lead to decision or action
it is important to keep the research activity
separated from the decision and
implementation activities.
• This helps to maintain as much neutrality as
possible in the research process and helps the
researcher remain objective.
39
• The dashed line separates research (information
generating) from the problem solving process
RESEARCH
PROBLEM-SOLVING
40
• This model of problem-solving is not relevant
to disciplinary research, which is less likely to
require decisions.
• Problem solving for decision making:
– is initiated with problem definition,
– progresses to analysis,
– then decision making and actions follow to
implement the decision.
• Normative and positivistic knowledge are
used interdependently, impacting each step
in the process.
41
Research Problem Identification
• This is the most critical and important part of
all research projects.
• The problem is the focus of both basic and
applied research. It is the reason (justification)
for the research.
• The problem identification and explanation
affect the quality, usefulness, effectiveness,
and efficiency of the research, more than any
other part of the research plan.
42
• The research problem is the reason the
research is being undertaken
• The written problem description is the only
credible evidence that a clear understanding
of the issue has been achieved.
43
The Problem Statement
• Research problems are always linked to a more
general set of problems, so it is useful to
separate the problem statement into two parts:
1) The general problem (or problematic situation),
2) The specific problem (or the researchable problem).
46
Objectives
• Objectives specify what the research project
proposes to accomplish (do, achieve, estimate,
determine, measure, evaluate, etc.)
• They are usually best specified in general and
specific parts. Often the shortest part of the
proposal, but it is the centerpiece.
1) General objective – states the main purpose of the
study. It should derive directly from the research
problem statement. One sentence is best!
2) Specific objectives – a set or list of sub-objectives,
each of which contributes to achieving the general
objective
47
Developing Problem and Objective
Statements
• There are no constant rules or procedures to
developing problem and objective statements.
It may depend on how much you know about
the subject of the research.
• If your knowledge of the subject is limited, you
may start with a broad consideration of the
subject – then narrow the focus by segmenting
problem areas into logical components (issues,
questions, etc.)
48
• If you know more about the research area and
already have a good idea about the
researchable problem, you may need to
develop the general dimensions or context of
the problem. (ie. Opposite from the previous
example).
• Once the problem has been defined and
general objective identified, the specific
objectives often naturally follow, by
considering what are important components.
• A logical and clearly written statement of
problems and objectives is often the most
difficult part of proposal writing.
49
Data Collection
Introduction
51
Data Collection Strategies
• No one best way: decision depends on:
– What you need to know: numbers or stories
– Where the data reside: environment, files, people
– Resources and time available
– Complexity of the data to be collected
– Frequency of data collection
– Intended forms of data analysis
52
Rules for Collecting Data
53
Contd…..
54
Structured Approach
• All data collected in the same way
• Especially important for multi-site and cluster
evaluations so you can compare
• Important when you need to make
comparisons with alternate interventions
55
Use Structured Approach When:
• need to address extent questions
• have a large sample or population
• know what needs to be measured
• need to show results numerically
• need to make comparisons across different
sites or interventions
56
Semi-structured Approach
• Systematic and follow general procedures but
data are not collected in exactly the same way
every time
• More open and fluid
• Does not follow a rigid script
– may ask for more detail
– people can tell what they want in their own way
57
Use Semi-structured
Approach when:
• conducting exploratory work
• seeking understanding, themes, and/or issues
• need narratives or stories
• want in-depth, rich, “backstage” information
• seek to understand results of data that are
unexpected
58
Quantitative Approach
• Data in numerical form
• Data that can be precisely measured
– age, cost, length, height, area, volume, weight,
speed, time, and temperature
• Harder to develop
• Easier to analyze
IPDET © 2009 59
Qualitative Approach
• Data that deal with description
• Data that can be observed or self-reported, but
not always precisely measured
• Less structured, easier to develop
• Can provide “rich data” — detailed and widely
applicable
• Is challenging to analyze
• Is labor intensive to collect
• Usually generates longer reports
60
Which Data?
If you: Then Use:
- want to conduct statistical analysis
- want to be precise Quantitative
- know what you want to measure
- want to cover a large group
- want narrative or in-depth information
- are not sure what you are able to measure Qualitative
- do not need to quantify the results
IPDET © 2009 61
Obtrusive v/s Unobtrusive
Methods
Obtrusive Unobtrusive
data collection methods data collection
that directly obtain methods that do not
information from those collect information
being evaluated directly from evaluees.
e.g., interviews, surveys, e.g., document analysis,
focus groups GoogleEarth, observation
at a distance, trash of the
stars
62
How to Decide on Data Collection
Approach
63
Triangulation to Increase Accuracy
of Data
• Triangulation of methods
– collection of same information using different
methods
• Triangulation of sources
– collection of same information from a variety of
sources
• Triangulation of evaluators
– collection of same information from more than one
evaluator
64
Data Collection Tools
• Participatory Methods
• Records and Secondary Data
• Observation
• Surveys and Interviews
• Focus Groups
• Diaries, Journals, Self-reported Checklists
• Expert Judgment
• Delphi Technique
• Other Tools
IPDET © 2009 65
Mar 25, 2024 66