Week 3 Part1 - Risk Uncertainty

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 27

1.

2 Project risk Management

Risk Management
Risk & Uncertainty

All knowledge degenerates into probability.

David Hume(1711–1776),
Scottish Philosopher
2

Learning Objectives
• Upon completion, you should be able to:
– Explain how personality and cultural influences
affect
our attitudes and behaviour with regard to risk.
– Identify the 4 main risk personality types and their
distinguishing characteristics.
– Distinguish between what is controllable and what
is
the preserve of chance.
Risk & Uncertainty
• We will conclude this introduction by exploring
the meaning of uncertainty.
• We saw previously, that risk can be described
as: the combination of the probability of an
event and its consequences.
• We therefore need to be clear about the
meaning of probability.
Uncertainty
• Uncertainty is the deviation of one or more
results of one or more future events from their
expected value.
• The lack of certainty, a state of having limited
knowledge where it is impossible to exactly
describe existing state or future outcome, more
than one possible outcome.
• At any point in time, we can summarise our
state of knowledge and uncertainty according
to the following table:
Four Quadrants Model of Knowledge

Knowledge Risks
(known knowns) (known unknowns)
Predictable future states Possible states identified
Ambiguous outcomes
Project data
Quantifiable variables
Independently verifiable Know contingency actions
evidence

Untapped Uncertainty
Knowledge (unknown unknowns)
Hidden knowledge
(unknown knowns) Unknown relationships between
Researchable facts key variables
Unshared skills and Unpredictable events
information ‘Bolts from the blue’
Untapped resources
Knowledge and the Future

• We are particularly interested in our


knowledge and uncertainty about future
events.
• Some future events are very predictable –
some are not.
Uncertainty & Probability

• When there is uncertainty about future events


we can try to use probability theory.
• Probability theory will hopefully reduce our
uncertainty.
• However, probability theory is more useful in
some situations than others.
• Consider the following examples:
Probability Example

• Consider the following coin tossing exercise:


• Everybody in a room takes a coin and stands up.
• Everybody tosses their coin. Those people who
throw a head sit down and quit the game.
• If there are say 40 people in the room, how
many throws will it take before there is just one
person left standing ?
Probability
• You can watch David Spiegelhalter doing this
exercise with a group of people if you follow the
following link.
• Link to lecture
• (http://understandinguncertainty.org/node/502)
• If you think about all the different coins being
tossed, would you expect the results to be so
predictable?
Probability
• What do you think the probability that 2 (or
more) people in a group of 23 people share the
same birthday?
• Follow the link below to see the answer. Is it
what you expected.
• Link to article
• (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-27835311)
Routine Events
• Probability theory is very useful for predicting
routine events.
• For example, what are your journey times to
work/University each morning?

Journey Times
14
12
10
Frequency

8
6
4
2
0
17 20 23 26 29 More
Time (minutes)
Probability Theory
• We can ‘model’ those routine events with an
appropriate probability distribution, such as The
Normal Distribution (Bell Curve)
Rare Events
• However, some events seem to be much more
difficult to predict.
• Why can we not predict major natural disasters
such as earthquakes?
Natural Disasters
Frequency of earthquakes
(based on observations since 1900)

Magnitude Average Annually


8 and higher 1
7 - 7.9 15
6 - 6.9 134
5 - 5.9 1319
4 - 4.9 13,000 (estimated)
3 - 3.9 130,000 (estimated)
2 - 2.9 1,300,000 (estimated)
What Links the Following?
• The First World War
• The dissolution of the Soviet Union
• The rise of the internet
• The 9/11 terrorist attacks in the USA
• The 2008 financial crash
• Black Swans
Black Swans
• Nassim Taleb (2007, 2010) coined the term
‘black swan’ to describe a particular type of
rare event:
• The event is a surprise (to the observer).
• The event has a major impact.
• After the fact, the event is rationalized by
hindsight, as if it had been expected.
Deepwater Horizon

• On the evening of 20 April 2010, a gas release and


subsequent explosion occurred on the Deepwater
Horizon oil rig working on an exploration well for
BP in the Gulf of Mexico.
• Eleven people died as a result of the accident and
others were injured.
• The fire burned for 36 hours before the rig sank,
and hydrocarbons leaked into the Gulf of Mexico
before the well was closed and sealed.
Deepwater Horizon

• "For BP this was the ultimate low-probability, high-


impact event – a black swan to borrow a term used
in the financial crisis." (Chief Executive Hayward,
2010)
• "The whole industry had been lulled into a sense of
false security after 20 years of drilling in deep water
without a serious accident, till now," said Hayward,
in criticism which will be challenged by oil rivals
who have tried to distance themselves from the
behaviour of the British oil group. Hayward admitted
the contingency plans drawn up by the company
were completely inadequate. (Guardian, 2010)
Scenario Analysis
• In spite of all the effort that goes into predicting
the future, there are still major happenings that
take everyone by surprise: e.g. the Icelandic ash
cloud, or the Credit Crunch. These events cause
not only an immediate shake-up in business and
social life, but set in motion a ripple of activity
for many years afterwards. It is not the purpose
of scenario analysis to predict a cataclysmic
event; instead, it traces the logical
consequences and side-effects of such an
event.
Scenario Analysis
• The 9/11 terrorist attack caused a number of
ripple effects. One of which was:
 An increased fear of flying
 Greater use of cars
 A significant increase in road accidents
Forecasting & Experts
• When we are uncertain about the future, we
often turn to so-called experts to make
predictions.
• But how accurate are their predictions?
• For example, economists are always making
forecasts about the future. But if you look at the
financial news pages, you will see many
comments like the following:
Accuracy of Economic Forecasts?
• “The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has
forecast that the world economy will grow
faster this year than previously expected.”
• “China's gross domestic product (GDP) grew a
faster-than-expected 10.3% in 2010, official
statistics show.”
• The Irish Republic's economy shrank in the
second quarter from the previous three months,
surprising analysts who had been expecting
growth.
• The UK's economy suffered a shock contraction
in the last three months of 2010, figures have
shown.
Forecasting & Experts

Philip Tetlock (2006) has studied the accuracy


of political experts’ forecasts. He conducted an
extended research project over 20 years in the
domain of politics. He tracked how experts
predicted developments across the world - from
the Soviet Union to the Middle East – and
measured how accurate their predictions were.
Generally, so-called experts were no better at
predicting the future than people in general.
(His book identifies different characteristics –
he distinguishes between foxes and hedgehogs.)
However, there is one key difference between
‘experts’ and people in general - ‘experts’
generally have more confidence in the accuracy
of their forecasts.
Forecasts and Uncertainty
• It would seem that in many domains we are
not very good at making accurate forecasts.
• However, how concerned are we if forecasts
are wrong?
• Often, we seem to prefer wrong forecasts to
uncertainty?
• For example, imagine what you would think
if your doctor told you she didn’t know what
was wrong with you?
• However, uncertainty is something we can
not avoid.
Risk & Uncertainty
• We started this introduction by considering the
meaning of the word risk.
• We saw that traditionally risk management has
been mainly concerned with avoiding ‘downside
risks’.
• For our purposes, we want to take a more
general approach, as illustrated by the following
table:
Risk or Uncertainty
Management
Risk management Uncertainty management
a downside risk a threat (giving rise to downside risk)
an upside risk an opportunity (giving rise to upside risk)
a risk (upside or downside) a source of uncertainty
a (possible) source of risk a source of uncertainty
a problem an issue
an impact a consequence/effect
a weakness an issue
a poor allocation an inappropriate/unclear allocation
inadequate inappropriate
avoid risk resolve uncertainty
Summary
• If we know something will happen, it may be a
problem, but it is not a risk.
• Risks involve uncertainty. We therefore need a
very good understanding of why and where
uncertainty arises.
• In particular, we need to understand how and
when we can predict future events – and when
we can not predict them.

You might also like