1. The document provides guidelines for developing the different sections of a research proposal, including the introduction/background, literature review, conceptual framework, methodology, and conclusions.
2. It outlines the key elements that should be included in each section, such as outlining the problem in the introduction, summarizing related studies in the literature review, and describing the research design, instruments, and data analysis plan in the methodology section.
3. The document is intended to guide researchers in developing a well-structured research proposal that clearly establishes the problem, reviews previous work, and describes the planned research process.
1. The document provides guidelines for developing the different sections of a research proposal, including the introduction/background, literature review, conceptual framework, methodology, and conclusions.
2. It outlines the key elements that should be included in each section, such as outlining the problem in the introduction, summarizing related studies in the literature review, and describing the research design, instruments, and data analysis plan in the methodology section.
3. The document is intended to guide researchers in developing a well-structured research proposal that clearly establishes the problem, reviews previous work, and describes the planned research process.
1. The document provides guidelines for developing the different sections of a research proposal, including the introduction/background, literature review, conceptual framework, methodology, and conclusions.
2. It outlines the key elements that should be included in each section, such as outlining the problem in the introduction, summarizing related studies in the literature review, and describing the research design, instruments, and data analysis plan in the methodology section.
3. The document is intended to guide researchers in developing a well-structured research proposal that clearly establishes the problem, reviews previous work, and describes the planned research process.
1. The document provides guidelines for developing the different sections of a research proposal, including the introduction/background, literature review, conceptual framework, methodology, and conclusions.
2. It outlines the key elements that should be included in each section, such as outlining the problem in the introduction, summarizing related studies in the literature review, and describing the research design, instruments, and data analysis plan in the methodology section.
3. The document is intended to guide researchers in developing a well-structured research proposal that clearly establishes the problem, reviews previous work, and describes the planned research process.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17
Title Must answer the
following questions:
1. What will be investigated, determined,
or discovered? 2. Who are the participants/respondents? 3. Where will the research be conducted? (research locale/setting/place THE PROBLEM AND A REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE Introduction or Background of the Study 1. Must arouse the interest of the readers 2. Describes the prevailing problem situation at the global, national, regional or local level that motivate the conduct of the study
(from the broad perspective to the narrow: letter T)
Links and relates the background of the study to the proposed
research problem; discusses important features of the place or setting of the study which have a bearing on the present study Explains what the study is all about Provides a strong justification for the study (what need is being responded to, who benefits form the study, research gap being addressed, need for further investigation due to inconsistent results in earlier studies, persisting problems, etc.) REVIEW/SURVEY OF RELATED LITERATURE 1. Related insofar as the literature resembles the focus and/or methodology of the present research; or covers some or all of the variables covered by the present study. 2. Establishes what is already known about the problem and what needs to be investigated 3. Identifies the origin of the present problem 4. Identifies strengths and flaws of previous studies (e.g. as regards design or the research, sampling plan and sample size, data collection, data analysis, instruments used) 5. Highlights the importance of the present investigation 6. Sources: books, pamphlets, magazines, conference papers, other periodicals: theses, dissertations, journal articles, and other publications REVIEW/SURVEY OF RELATED LITERATURE
7. Empirical findings, as well as theories, concepts, ideas, opinions
of experts or authorities in the field/discipline covered by the study 8. Primary sources are preferred to secondary sources. 9. For empirical studies, present the problem, findings, conclusions, and methodology (sampling plan, instruments, findings and conclusions) including comments on the appropriateness of the research design, data analysis, and plausibility and extent of applicability of the findings, in the light of the research design) 10. Present thematically to conform with the specific problems of the study 11. Synthesize to promote a coherent view of the state of knowledge on the selected topic/problem; include how the reviewed studies are similar to or different from present research. Conceptual/Theoretical Framework
1. Derived from the related literature; it provides the
conceptual/theoretical underpinning of the study 2. Start with the theory that will be investigated/verified or will guide the conduct of the research 3. Explain how variables will be measured 4. Congruent with the title and with the problems of the study 5. Includes a schematic diagram that synthesizes the textual presentation. Diagram shows the variables to be covered and their hypothesized relationships through boxes, arrows, lines Statement of the Problem
1. Based on the conceptual /theoretical
framework 2. Consists of the main and the sub-problems Main problem covers all the variables indicated in the title and presented in the framework; excludes those that are not reflected thereat Sub-problems : give a breakdown of the main problem; no more, no less; arranged in logical order, extensive in coverage (i.e. not answerable by either yes, no – unless they deal with statistical analysis), when and where; mutually exclusive in dimensions/aspects to be addressed Assumptions
1. Adopted as premises to the solution of the
problem
2. Propositions accepted as true; hence do not
need to be proved Significance of the Study
1. Contributions to expand the knowledge
in the field 2. Importance to the local community, the country, the government, the institution, the agency concerned, the curriculum planners and developers and to researchers 3. Probable impact to education, science, technology, on-going researches, etc. Scope and Limitations
1. Presents briefly the nature, content coverage or area
of the investigation, geographical area and time period covered by the study; population and the sample drawn from this population 2. Also presents variables included in the investigation and the exclusion of variables which are expected by readers to be included in the study 3. Indicates the extent of applicability of results 4. Limitations (weaknesses or accepted shortcomings of the study will be known after its completion. These weaknesses are acknowledged in this section. Definition of Terms
1. Operationally defined if intended
meanings are different from conceptual or dictionary definitions 2. Include words or phrases taken from the title or often used in the research report 3. Stated in complete sentences and arranged alphabetically METHODOLOGY
Research Method or Research Design (with
brief explanation of the research method/design) Presents and briefly discusses the research design/method (historical, ethnographic, etc.)
3.2. Sampling Procedure or Respondents of the
Study (presents the relevant characteristics of the population and of the sample, the sampling procedure, the sample size and how it is determined) METHODOLOGY
Instruments
Researcher-made or standardized instruments (e.g.
questionnaires, checklists, interview protocols, tests) adopted with permission Presents the author, purpose, reliability and validity measures, gird (parts), response modes, scoring, interpretations of scores of each instrument Procedures (description/explanation of what data were obtained and how those were obtained; maintaining congruence among the framework, the problems, hypotheses and the procedures) METHODOLOGY
Data Analysis (for qualitative information:
explanation of the techniques of data analysis; for quantitative data: the descriptive and/or inferential statistical tools/tests to be used and the purpose for which those are used) If the research instrument includes options which have numerical weights, an explanation of scoring and interpretations of scores RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Results (presentation of findings or results of
data analysis: tabular, graphical, textual) Discussion (interpretations of findings, tying up with related literature/theory; plausible logical explanations for unexpected findings, implications drawn in the light of current educational practice, process or product) SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summary: a brief account of the study stating the objectives, methods, findings and conclusions)
Conclusions: must be related to the
objectives/problems stated in the study; must look at the implications of the findings to a related literature, current educational practice, process or product.
Recommendations: establishes the connection of
the findings and conclusion; presents some probable areas/direction for future research REFERENCES AND APPENDICES
REFERENCES: contains the citation of all the
resources used in the study; arranged in alphabetical order
APPENDICES: must be properly labeled;
contains the pertinent documents used in the study for further reference