0% found this document useful (0 votes)
119 views24 pages

Feb1104 Transp GIS

This document summarizes a presentation on GIS applications for transportation planning in Anchorage, Alaska. It discusses how a travel demand model was used to support the city's long-range transportation plan, including trip generation, distribution, mode choice and route choice. It also describes how the model was based on data from the city's household travel survey, including information on numbers of households, persons, workers, vehicles and other variables.

Uploaded by

api-3747051
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
119 views24 pages

Feb1104 Transp GIS

This document summarizes a presentation on GIS applications for transportation planning in Anchorage, Alaska. It discusses how a travel demand model was used to support the city's long-range transportation plan, including trip generation, distribution, mode choice and route choice. It also describes how the model was based on data from the city's household travel survey, including information on numbers of households, persons, workers, vehicles and other variables.

Uploaded by

api-3747051
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

GIS Applications for

Transportation Planning
Presented to
GIS Jam Session
ASMC 2004: Pioneering Our Alaska
Future
02/11/2004
Presentation Themes

• Technical applications supporting


long-range planning (Anchorage
LRTP)
• Intelligent Map Books
• Interactive (map-centric) Reports
20-Year Blueprint for Transportation
Analysis Supported By Travel
Demand Model

• Trip Generation
• Trip Distribution
• Mode Choice
• Route Choice
Relations Based on Household
Travel Survey (Who We Are)
Variable Expanded
Data
Total 94,822
Households
Total Persons 250,522
Persons per 2.64
HH
Total Workers 141,109
Workers per 1.48
#
#
HH
#

Total Vehicles 191,421


##

#
# #
# #

Vehicles per 2.02


#
# # #
##### #
#### ##
#
### #
#
# # ## #
# ## #

HH
#
#
# # ## #
# #
# #
# # ## # ###
## #
#
# #
## ## #
#
##
##
##

#
### ##
#
Variable Expanded
Data
#

##
#
#
##
#

Total Person 980,165


###
# # ##
## # ##
#
# # # #
#
## #
# ##
# ###
##
##
###
# ##
# ### #

Trips
# ## #
#
## ## ## ### #
# ## ####
##
#
# # #
#### #
#####
# ###### #
#
### ####
## #
### # #
#
#
#
###### # # #
#
####
##### ###
####
# # #
## #
# #

Mountain View
#
#
#
#
#

##
#
#
Mean Trips 10.3
# # # #
per HH
#
# #

Mean Trips 4.1


# ## #
Downtown # ## #
# #
Military
##
#
##

Chugiak-Eagle River
North Midtown # #
# #
####
##
#
#
#
#
##
##
###
###
#
##
#
##
## # ##
##
# ###
#
## # ##
#
#
per Person
## ##### ##
### ###
## #
### ##
## # ## # ## # ##
Northwest ## # # # ### # #
#

Mean Trip 16.3


#
# ## # ##### # ## ### ### #
####
#
## #
##### #### #### # # # # ##
### ###### #
# #### # ## ## #
# #
# ##### #
###
## # ## ## #### ## # ## #
#
#
#
#
# # # # #
# #
## ##
## ###
# ## ## ## ##### # ## #
##
# ## #
# #
#
# ## ####
## #### #
# # ## ## # #
#
# ##
##### ## # # # # #####

Duration
##### ## # ## ### #### #
# ##
### # ## #
# # # # # # # #
# #
# #### # ##
# ##
### #
# ##
# # ## # # #
# ##
### # # ##
### ####
# # # ## # #
####
##
# # #
Muldoon
# # #### ##
# # ### # # # ## #
#
###
### #
# #### # # #### # # # ##### ### #
#
# # ###
#
# #### #
# #
##
## #
####
#
# ##
# ## #
### #
### # ## # # # ######## # # # ##
# # # # # ## ##

(minutes)
# ### # #
## # # ## #
Airport # ## # #
## # # #
Abbott Loop
# # # #
##### #

#
#
#
#
##
#
#
# #
#
## ## #
#
## #
### #
University
## ## # ## #
#
## ###
### # ## # ## #

Total Vehicle 868,157


# # ## ##
## #
# #### #
# ## ## # # # ##
## #
# ## ## #
# #
###### # #
## #
# ### ### # ## #
# #
# ## # # ###
# # # # ### # # # #
#
### # ##
## ##
# ##
# # #
### # #
#### # ## ##
## ###
#
## # # # # ## # ##

Trips
# # # # #####
Sand Lake # #
#
####
#
##
#
##
#
# ##
#
# ## #
##
#
####
#
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
## #
##
##
##
#
# # ## ### #
## # # # ## # ####
###
##
#####
## # # # ## # #
## ### ## ###
# # ##
## # # ## # # # #
#
South Midtown # #

Total Transit 40,233


## # ##
##
## ## ## ## # ##
Hillside
# # ## # #
# #
## # # #
#### # # # ## # # # #
# ## # ##
# # ## # # ## # ## ##
### # #### #
South Anchorage
## # #

Trips
# ## # # # # # ## # # # #
#
#### # #### #
#
# # # #
#
## #
#
# # #

Total Non- 71,775


# #
## # #
##
# # #
#

motorized
##
#
#
#

Trips
Relations Based on Household
Travel Survey (What We Do)

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
To/ From To/ From Personal Serve
Shopping Recreation Eat Out Other
Work School Bus Passenger

<15 min 41.9% 47.8% 56.2% 65.5% 49.1% 56.5% 62.1% 49.0%
15-30 min 49.4% 47.8% 37.4% 29.1% 39.6% 38.3% 34.2% 42.7%
31-60 min 7.6% 3.6% 4.9% 3.8% 6.2% 2.8% 3.4% 6.0%
60+ min 1.1% 0.7% 1.5% 1.6% 5.0% 2.4% 0.3% 2.3%
What Do We Need To Know?

•How People Make Decisions


•What Location Factors Influence
Decision Making
Develop Descriptive Variables
Employment (SIC Classifications) – Address Based
Retail
Service
Agriculture, forestry, fish & mine Land Use & Other Location Attributes
Construction Local Intersections
Manufacturing Hourly Parking Cost
Daily Parking Cost
Transportation Monthly Parking Cost
Wholesale
Financial Parcel Based (Number, Total Area & Average
Government Size)
Other Residential
Commercial
Accessibility (Employment, Households & Mixed Use, Industrial
Local Intersections) Vacant
Other
¼ Mile Total recreational acres
½ Mile
1 Mile Households
Level of Service

Walk to bus time/distance


Employment

• 7,000 Locations
• 155,000 Employees
Households
Urban Forum - Sidewalks & Paths
Parking Costs
Not your typical spatial analysis?

What is the relationship between


observed survey and derived GIS
environment data
Proximity Analysis
Proximity Analysis
Accessibility
Build Statistical Behavior Models

•Quantitative verses Qualitative


•Objective measures applied
•Geocode, Geocode, Geocode
•Location Matters!
Sample Model (Mode Choice)

Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression Number of obs = 9464


LR chi2(13) = 3160.45
Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
Log likelihood = -1331.4578 Pseudo R2 = 0.5427

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
choice | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
in_veh_time (m_time) | -.0751425 .0093433 -8.04 0.000 -.0934551 -.0568299
out_veh_time(ovtim4) | -.5719232 .1218245 -4.69 0.000 -.8106948 -.3331517
o_pef_ext/int_walk | .0005306 .0001802 2.94 0.003 .0001774 .0008837
od_retail_ratio | 1.762788 .6342401 2.78 0.005 .5197002 3.005876
income-transit only | -.0237387 .0057404 -4.14 0.000 -.0349895 -.0124878
log-totalemp-1m | .0864845 .0404308 2.14 0.032 .0072417 .1657274
parking cost | -.0084478 .0036181 -2.33 0.020 -.0155392 -.0013565
no-car | 2.42729 .2257827 10.75 0.000 1.984764 2.869816
drive-w-pass constant| -2.260445 .0925487 -24.42 0.000 -2.441837 -2.079053
passenger constant | -2.299982 .0942224 -24.41 0.000 -2.484655 -2.11531
transit constant | -5.259264 .5564069 -9.45 0.000 -6.349802 -4.168727
walk constant | -4.406498 .470499 -9.37 0.000 -5.328659 -3.484337
bike constant | -7.229919 .5408055 -13.37 0.000 -8.289878 -6.169959
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample Model Structure
Measuring against observed
Measuring against observed
Theme 1 Questions?
ArcGIS Map Book Demo

Fire Map Book Toolbar

New Content View’s


added to the Table of
Contents
Electronic Conditions Reports

You might also like