Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Chapter 1
The crude death rate was 5.995 per 1,000 in Ethiopia in 2023.
The crude death rate in Addis Ababa was approximately 6.29 per
1000 (data of 2020).
14 Age-specific Mortality Rate
Answer: NMR =
That means out of 1000 live births in 2010, 40 of them died before
28 days after birth.
18 Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)
Example: In 1996, the total number of children under 5 years of age was
10,000 in “Zone C”. In the same year, 200 children under five years of age
died. Calculate the under-five mortality rate (U5MR).
U5MR =
20
Maternal Mortality Rate
Maternal Mortality Rate =
TIME
PLACE
PERSON
Time
24
There are three major kinds of changes in disease occurrence over
time.
1. SECULAR TRENDS (slowly change): This refers to gradual
changes over long period of time, such as years or decades.
E.g. AIDS, cancer.
2. PERIODIC OR CYCLIC CHANGES. This refers to recurrent
alterations in the frequency of diseases.
Cycles may be annual or have some other periodicity. E.g. measles,
malaria, meningitis.
3. SPORADIC: irregular and unpredictable intervals.
E.g. influenza, Allergies
25
Time (Cont’d…)
Secular trend can be due to one or more of the following factors.
1. Change in diagnostic technique
2. Change in accuracy of enumerating population at risk.
3. Change in age distribution of the people.
4. Change of survival from disease.
5. Change in actual incidence of the disease.
26
Time (Cont’d…)
Changing or Stable
Seasonal Variation
Clustered (Epidemic) or evenly distributed (Endemic)
Point source or Propagated
27
Place
The frequency of disease is different in different places.
Natural barriers: environmental or climatic conditions, such as
temperature, humidity, rainfall, altitude, mineral content of soil, or
water supply
Political boundaries: Intended for planning and allocation of
resources
Urban-rural differences in disease occurrence: in terms of
migration, style of living and differential environmental exposures
also helpful
28
Place (Cont’d…)
Geographically restricted or widespread (Pandemic)
Relation to food or water supply
Multiple clusters or one
29
Person
Age
Socio-economic status
Gender
Ethnicity
Behavior
Person (Who)
30
Young vs Old
Female vs male
Rich vs Poor
Illiterate Vs educate
Place (Where)
Lowland vs Highland
Urban vs Rural
Time (When)
Day/night variation
Seasonal variation
Long term
31
Disease Occurrence
Dynamics of Disease Transmission
Interaction of agents and environmental factors with human
hosts
Distribution of severity of diseases
Modes of disease transmission
Level of disease in community when transmission stops
32 The Basic Triad of Analytic Epidemiology
The three phenomena assessed in Analytic Epidemiology
are:
Host
Agent Environment
33 The Basic Triad of Analytic Epidemiology
Host: In epidemiology, the host is usually a human who gets sick
but can also be an animal that acts as a carrier of disease but may or
may not present illness.
Agent: Epidemiologic triangle agents include Bacteria, Viruses,
Fungi, Protozoa, et cetera.
Environment: The environment represents the favorable
conditions for an agent to cause a health event. Environmental
factors include physical features like geology or climate, biological
factors like the presence of disease-transmitting insects, and
socioeconomic factors like crowding, sanitation, and access to
health services.
34 Measuring Disease Frequency
Incidence
Prevalence
Defined time period
Population at risk
35 When Calculating DF(disease frequency)
The numerator (number of cases/episodes)
The denominator (total population at risk)
Factor (e.g. 100, 1000, 10000)
Time period (dates, weeks, months, or years)
We use the following to determine DF.
Use rates: incidence rates
Prevalence rates
36 Incidence and Prevalence rates
Decide what are you counting.
Episodes/cases, people, attendance or what?
What is the service count when filling monthly statistics eg.
diarrhea or malaria
people get repeated attacks in one month and attend your service
This is one person sick but has suffered several times separate
episodes in one year and attended your service several times
37 Incidence and Prevalence rates
Incidence: Count episodes/cases
Prevalence: chronic conditions/diseases which count the total
number of sick people.
To study the use of health services, informations on new attendance
and repeat attendance are required.
38 When Calculating:
Incidence rate:
Prevalence rate:
39
Example 1: In September 1995 there were 200 new cases of
relapsing fever in “Kebele X”. The average total population of
“Kebele X” was 4000. Calculate the incidence rate of relapsing fever
in “Kebele X” in September 1995. Answer: 50 new cases per 1000
Example 2: 5,600,000 people in South Africa were estimated to be
infected with HIV in 2009 with a total population of 53 million. What
is the prevalence of HIV in the South? Answer:
40 Comparing Incidence and Prevalence
Incidence Prevalence
New cases or events over a All cases at a point/interval
period of time of time
Useful to study factors Useful for measuring the size
causing risks of the problem and planning
41 Relationship of Incidence to Prevalence
Prevalence depends on both on incidence rate and duration of
disease
Because prevalence is affected by factors such as migration and
duration, incidence is preferred for studying etiology.
Prevalence = Incidence X Duration
42 Relationship between Incidence, Prevalence and Disease
Duration
Incidence
Prevalence Death
Cure
Lost to follow up
43 Attack Rate
Example: Consider the outbreak of cholera in country Y in
March 2016. 490 population with cholera and the population at
risk were 18,600. What is the AR?
Answer:
44 Relative Risk (RR) or Risk Ratio
Defined as the ratio of the incidence of disease in the exposed
divided by the corresponding non-exposed group.
Example
1st give Breast Cancer
Birth Yes No Total
Where, and
ln is a natural logarithm.
49
The Odds Ratio
The odds ratio (OR) is the odds in favor of disease for the exposed
group divided by the exposed group divided by the odds in the
favor of disease for the unexposed group.
The odds in favor of disease is , where, p is probability of a
disease.
50 The Odds Ratio
51
The Odds Ratio
The odds ratio is defined as:
Is estimated by:
52
The Odds Ratio
Example: in the study of the risk factors for invasive cervical
cancer, the following data were collected (case-control)
or
(1.10, 2.13)
This interval does not contain the value 1
We conclude that the odds of developing cervical cancer
are significantly higher for smokers than for nonsmokers
58 Quiz (5%)
Consider the total 22,071 people under study;
where 11,037 were assigned to the Aspirin user
group and the rest were assigned to a placebo
group. If 104 people among the Aspirin users have
a Myocardial Infarction case and in total, there are
293 Myocardial Infarction cases, find the Odds
Ratio and Interpret the result.
59
Bias
Describes error arise from the design or execution of
the study.
It’s undesirable
It can’t be adjusted
Useful to consider in any study
Essential to consider in critical appraisal
60
Bias
It’s a systematic error introduced to the study design.
Two major forms
Selection Bias: refers to any error that arises in the
process of identifying the study subjects.
Information Bias: includes any systematic error in
the measurements on either exposure or outcome
variable.
61 Selection Bias
Selection bias occurs when identification of subjects for
inclusion into a study depends on the interest of the data
collector or investigator.
If selection of cases and controls (eg in case control
study) is based on different criteria, then bias can occur.
There are lots of circumstances selection bias to occur,
but there are two major known forms.
62
Types of Selection Bias
Response Bias:
Those who agree to be in a study may be in some way different
from those who refuse to participate.
Volunteers may be different from those who are listed.
Berksonian Bias:
Bias that is introduced due to differences in criteria/probabilities of
admission to the hospital for those with the disease and those
without the disease.
Admission criteria of the hospital
63
Information Bias
In analytical studies usually one factor is known and another is
measured.
E.g. in case control studies, the “outcome” is known and the
“exposure” is measured.
E.g. in cohort studies, the exposure is known and the outcome is
measured.
64 Information Bias
Error in the measurements/information obtained in the study could
be:
Error due to participants
Error due to “observers”
Differential (Non-random)
Non-differential (Random)
• (i.e. is it influencing equally on the exposure and the outcome?)
65 Types of Information Bias
1. Interviewer Bias: an interviewer’s knowledge of the exposure and
outcome may influence the structure of questions and the manner
of presentation which may influence the response.
2. Recall Bias: those with a particular outcome or exposure may
remember events more clearly or amplify their memories.
3. Observer Bias: Observers may have preconceived expectations of
what they should find in an examination.
4. Lose to follow-up: those who are lost to follow-up or who
withdraw from the study may be different from those who are
followed for the entire study.
Types of Information Bias
66
5. Hawthorne effect: an effect first documented at the Hawthorne
manufacturing plant; people act differently if they know they are
being watched.
6. Surveillance Bias: The group with the known exposure or outcome
may be followed more closely or longer than the comparison
group.
7. Misclassification Bias: Errors are made in classifying either the
disease or exposure status.
67
Confounding Variable
The word came from Latin, “confundere” meaning “to
mix up”.
The measured effect of an exposure is distorted because
of the association of the exposure with another factor
(confounder) that influences the outcome.
Exposure Outcome
Confounder
Confounding
68
A problem resulting from the fact that one feature of study
subjects has not been separated from the second feature and has
thus been confounded with it producing a spurious result.
The spuriousness arises from the effect of the effect of the first
feature being mistakenly attributed to the second feature.
Confounding can produce either a type I or a type II error, but we
usually focus on the type I errors.
69 Confounding
At the simplest level, confounding can be thought of as a
confusion of effects.
The apparent effect of the exposure of interest is distorted
because the effect of an extraneous third factor is mixed
with the actual effect.
70
Difference from Bias…
Bias creates an association that is not true; however, confounding
describes an association that is true, but potentially misleading.
Key principle of confounding include that a confounder should
be associated with both the independent and dependent variables
(i.e. with the exposure and the disease)
Association of the confounder with just one of the two variables
is not enough to produce spurious result.
71
Effect of a confounder
Could be large
May produce an over or underestimate of the true effect
May change the apparent direction of the effect
Controls for confounding
72
Controls for confounding may be built into the design or analysis
stages of the study
Design stage
Randomization
Restriction
Matching (on the basis of the potential confounding variables;
especially, age and gender)
Cases and controls can be individually matched for one or more
variables, or they can be group matched.
Matching is more expensive and requires specific analytic
techniques
Control Confounding: Analysis Stage
73
Stratification
Multivariate Analysis: Multiple Linear Regression
74 Matching
One approach to deal with potential confounders is by matching.
Matching: is a statistical technique that is used to evaluate the effect of a
treatment by comparing the treated and the non-treated units in a study. It is a
technique that selects subjects so that the distribution of potential confounders is
similar in both groups.
For example, if we are assessing the effect of opium on total mortality and sex is
a potential confounder, one can match a male opium user to a male opium non-
user and a female opium user to a female opium non-user. This way users and
non-users will be exactly the same for sex, and thus sex could not confound the
association.
By extension, one can match for more than one variable, such as by age and sex.
For example, a 56-year-old male opium user can be matched to a 56-year-old
male non-user.