This document outlines the requirements and grading rubrics for a work immersion program. It contains three main sections:
1. Requirements for students to complete, including assembling a portfolio, notebook, time cards, and daily reports with photos documenting their learning experiences.
2. Details on submitting materials by the March 1st deadline and the grading breakdown, which includes evaluations from supervisors.
3. Schedules for exit interviews and a list of final reminders for students to maintain professionalism during their placements.
Rubrics are provided for evaluating students' daily reports, exit interview performances, and narrative reports based on content understanding, organization, and use of language. Students are assigned advisors and supervisors
This document outlines the requirements and grading rubrics for a work immersion program. It contains three main sections:
1. Requirements for students to complete, including assembling a portfolio, notebook, time cards, and daily reports with photos documenting their learning experiences.
2. Details on submitting materials by the March 1st deadline and the grading breakdown, which includes evaluations from supervisors.
3. Schedules for exit interviews and a list of final reminders for students to maintain professionalism during their placements.
Rubrics are provided for evaluating students' daily reports, exit interview performances, and narrative reports based on content understanding, organization, and use of language. Students are assigned advisors and supervisors
This document outlines the requirements and grading rubrics for a work immersion program. It contains three main sections:
1. Requirements for students to complete, including assembling a portfolio, notebook, time cards, and daily reports with photos documenting their learning experiences.
2. Details on submitting materials by the March 1st deadline and the grading breakdown, which includes evaluations from supervisors.
3. Schedules for exit interviews and a list of final reminders for students to maintain professionalism during their placements.
Rubrics are provided for evaluating students' daily reports, exit interview performances, and narrative reports based on content understanding, organization, and use of language. Students are assigned advisors and supervisors
This document outlines the requirements and grading rubrics for a work immersion program. It contains three main sections:
1. Requirements for students to complete, including assembling a portfolio, notebook, time cards, and daily reports with photos documenting their learning experiences.
2. Details on submitting materials by the March 1st deadline and the grading breakdown, which includes evaluations from supervisors.
3. Schedules for exit interviews and a list of final reminders for students to maintain professionalism during their placements.
Rubrics are provided for evaluating students' daily reports, exit interview performances, and narrative reports based on content understanding, organization, and use of language. Students are assigned advisors and supervisors
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12
WORK IMMERSION
2024 MR. ARMYR A. ENCARNACION REQUIREMENT 1: CLEAR FOLDER (PORTFOLIO)
Cattleya Notebook (See next slide for details)
CV (with Updated Trainings and Seminars – LONG) 2 Time Card (1 for Portfolio, 1 for Work Immersion Partner) Notarized Student Waiver Computerized Daily Learnings with Pictures – LONG Certificate of Completion REQUIREMENT 2: CATTLEYA NOTEBOOK
Handwritten daily narrative reports
COLOR ASSIGNMENTS
GABRIEL – BLUE RAPHAEL – YELLOW MICHAEL – GREEN BARACHIEL - PINK SUBMISSION DATE
March 1, 2024, 4pm
Everyday late, -1 in the total score GRADING SYSTEM WW - 35% 50 Points – 10 Day Learning Report with Photos 20 Points – Attendance to Pre Immersion Class 20 Points – Exit Interview with Work Immersion Teacher PTASK – 40% 100 Points Evaluation of Supervisor QA – 25% 35 Points – Cattleya Narrative Reports EXIT INTERVIEW SCHEDULE February 14 – LGU Agoncillo, BOCustoms, Dra. Garces February 15 – Coast Guard, Atty Macababbad, LPU February 16 – LGU San Luis, OLCA, RGEMS, Caysasay February 19 – LGU San Nicolas, SLTEC, Atty. Gumapac February 20 – LGU Taal, LGU Sta. Teresita, Mt. Carmel February 21 –, Provincial Public Order and Safety Department, H. Rock, Alvarez February 22 – Provincial Tourism Office, Immigration, St. Peregrine EXIT INTERVIEW SCHEDULE
February 26 – Max’s, Hap Chan, Wellzone
February 27 – LGU Lemery, Dr. Serrano, BATELEC February 28 – Narrative, MY Diners, Lemery Doctors February 29 – Taal Polymedic, Metro Lemery, Volts FINAL REMINDERS Be in your best behavior. Always greet everyone. Limit the usage of cellphone. No vape / cigarettes allowed. Take photos. If absent, inform me, your adviser and your immediate supervisor. If there are problems and concerns, contact me. RUBRIC FOR 10 DAY LEARNING REPORTS 1. Content Understanding (20 points) 1. Excellent (17-20 points): Demonstrates a deep understanding of the work immersion experience. Clearly articulates key concepts, skills learned, and insights gained. Provides specific examples and connects them to broader learning objectives. 2. Good (13-16 points): Shows a good understanding of the work immersion experience. Presents key concepts and skills learned, with some specific examples. Relates experiences to learning objectives. 3. Fair (10 -12 points): Presents a basic understanding of the work immersion experience. Includes general information without much depth or specificity. Limited connection to learning objectives. 2. Photo Integration (15 points) 1. Excellent (13-15 points): Effectively integrates high-quality photos that enhance the understanding of the work immersion. Photos are relevant, well-captioned, and thoughtfully placed within the report. 2. Good (8-12 points): Integrates photos that complement the content. Photos are clear and appropriately captioned, contributing to the overall presentation. 3. Fair (5-7 points): Includes photos, but they are of average quality or relevance. Captions may lack detail or context. 3. Organization and Clarity (15 points) 1. Excellent (13-15 points): Presents information in a well-organized and clear manner. The report has a logical flow, with each section contributing to a cohesive narrative. Ideas are presented coherently. 2. Good (8-12 points): Organizes information in a generally clear manner. The report has a discernible structure, but some sections may lack cohesion. Ideas are mostly presented in a logical sequence. 3. Fair (5-7 points): Shows some attempt at organization, but the overall structure is confusing or lacks clarity. Ideas are presented in a disjointed manner. RUBRIC FOR EXIT INTERVIEW 1. Communication Skills (8 points) 1. Excellent (7-8 points): Effectively articulates experiences, challenges, and learning outcomes during the work immersion. Demonstrates clear and concise communication, utilizing appropriate language and tone. 2. Proficient (4-6 points): Communicates experiences, challenges, and learning outcomes clearly. May have occasional lapses in clarity or may use language that could be refined. 3. Basic (1-3 points): Communication is somewhat unclear or lacks detail. Difficulty expressing experiences and challenges. Frequent lapses in language and tone. 2. Reflective Analysis (6 points) 1. Excellent (6 points): Provides a thoughtful and insightful reflection on the overall work immersion experience. Analyzes personal growth, skills acquired, and the application of theoretical knowledge in a professional setting. 2. Proficient (4-5 points): Reflects on the work immersion experience, highlighting personal growth and skills acquired. Some depth in analysis but may lack thorough exploration. 3. Basic (1-3 points): Provides a basic reflection on the work immersion experience with limited analysis. Fails to delve into personal growth and skills acquired. 3. Professionalism and Adaptability (6 points) 1. Excellent (6 points): Demonstrates a high level of professionalism, adaptability, and a positive attitude throughout the work immersion. Handles challenges with resilience and effectively adapts to the work environment. 2. Proficient (4-5 points): Displays professionalism and adaptability during the work immersion, with occasional instances of challenge handling or adaptability concerns. Overall positive attitude. 3. Basic (1-3 points): Shows limited professionalism and adaptability. May struggle to handle challenges effectively. Negative attitude at times. RUBRIC FOR NARRATIVE REPORT 1. Content Understanding (15 points) 1. Excellent (13-15 points): Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the subject matter. Provides detailed, insightful, and well- supported information. 2. Proficient (9-12 points): Shows a strong understanding of the subject matter. Presents key information with clarity and supporting details. 3. Basic (5-8 points): Presents basic information with some understanding of the subject matter. Lacks in-depth analysis or supporting details. 2. Organization and Structure (10 points) 1. Excellent (9-10 points): Presents information in a well-organized and engaging manner. Follows a clear structure with smooth transitions. 2. Proficient (7-8 points): Organizes information effectively with a logical structure. Transitions between sections are mostly smooth. 3. Basic (4-6 points): Shows some organization, but the structure may be unclear or have awkward transitions. 3. Language and Style (10 points) 1. Excellent (9-10 points): Demonstrates excellent language use and style. Writing is clear, concise, and engaging. 2. Proficient (7-8 points): Uses effective language and style. Writing is generally clear and engaging with few lapses. 3. Basic (4-6 points): Language and style are basic, with occasional lapses in clarity or engagement.