Unit 1 Management & Evolution of Management Thought
Unit 1 Management & Evolution of Management Thought
Unit 1 Management & Evolution of Management Thought
Fundamentals of Management
o
Contribution of classical management
o The identification of mgt functions such as planning, decision making,
organising and controlling provide.
o The contributions of the classical school go beyond the important work
and identifying mgt field and its functions and principles.
Limitations
The classical school of mgt throught heavily on the concept or economic
man, which placed emphasis on an individuals related pursuit or economic
objective. However the social needs or employees were neglected.
Neo Classical Approach
• Illumination Experiment
• Relay Assembly Test Experiments
• Relay Assembly Room #2
• Mica Splitting Test Group
• Plant Interview Group
• Bank Wiring Observation Group
HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENT
Conducted by,
Elton Mayo
White Head
Roethlisberger
George Elton Mayo
He was an Australian Psychologist, Sociologist
and Organization Theorist.
Conclusions:
Light intensity has no conclusive effect on output
Productivity has a psychological component
•1927-1929
•Experiments were conducted by Elton Mayo
•Manipulated factors of production to measure effect on output:
– Pay Incentives (Each Girls pay was based on the other 5 in the group)
– Length of Work Day & Work Week (5pm, 4:30 pm, 4pm)
– Use of Rest Periods (Two 5 minutes break)
– Company Sponsored Meals (Morning Coffee & soup along with sandwich)
•Results:
– Higher output and greater employee satisfaction
•Conclusions:
– Positive effects even with negative influences – workers’ output will increase as a
response to attention
– Strong social bonds were created within the test group. Workers are influenced by need
for recognition, security and sense of belonging
Relay Assembly Room #2
1928-1929
Results:
‘Small group incentives’ resulted in highest sustained level of production –Output
dropped in 2nd session
Conclusion:
Pay relevant to output but not the only factor
Mica Splitting
Test Group
1928-1931
Result:
Productivity increased by 15% over standard output base
Conclusions:
Productivity is affected by non-pay considerations
Social dynamics are a basis of worker performance
Mass Interview
Program
Conducted 20,000 interviews.
Initially used the method of Direct Questioning and changed to Non Directive.
Results
-Workers are governed by experience obtained from both inside and outside
the company.
Mass Interview
Program (Contd)
- The workers were satisfied or dissatisfied depending upon how they regarded their
social status in the company.
1931-1932
Limited changes to work conditions
Segregated work area
No Management Visits
Supervision would remain the same
Observer would record data only – no interaction with workers
Conclusions:
Preexisting performance norms
Group dictated production standards –
Work Group protection from management changes.
CONCLUSION
•The Hawthorne studies have had a remarkable impact on
management in organizations and how workers react to various
situations.