EIA-Module 2
EIA-Module 2
EIA-Module 2
and from this a decision is made on whether or not a full EIA is to be carried
out.
Scoping: is the process of determining which are the most critical issues to
study and will involve community participation to some degree.
Consideration of alternatives: This seeks to ensure that the proponent has
purpose and rationale of the project and understand its various characteristics,
including the stages of development, location and processes.
Description of the environmental baseline: This includes the establishment of both the
present and future state of the environment, in the absence of the project, taking into account
the changes resulting from natural events and from other human activities.
Identification of key impacts: This brings together the previous steps with a view to
ensuring that all potentially significant environmental impacts (adverse and beneficial) are
identified and taken into account in the process.
The prediction of impacts: This step aims to identify the likely magnitude of the change
(i.e., impact) in the environment when the project is implemented in comparison with the
situation when the project is not carried out.
Evaluation and assessment of significance: This seeks to assess the relative significance
of the predicted impacts to allow a focus on key adverse impacts. Formal definition of
significance is the product of consequence and likelihood as
Decision-making: At this stage, decisions are made by the relevant authority of the
development impacts, after the decision to proceed with the project. It can contribute to
effective project management.
Auditing: This follows monitoring and involves comparing actual outcomes with
predicted outcomes, and can be used to assess the quality of predictions and the
effectiveness of mitigation. It provides a vital step in the EIA learning process
ELEMENTS OF EIA
Stage 1: Screening (Only for Category ‘B’ projects and
activities)
Stage 2: Scoping
Stage 3: Public Consultation
Stage 4: Appraisal
Stage 1: Screening
If ToR not finalized and conveyed to the applicant within sixty days
of the receipt of Form 1, ToR suggested by the applicant shall be
deemed as the final ToR approved for the EIA studies
Use other appropriate media for ensuring wide publicity about the
project
Within seven days of the receipt of a written request for arranging the
public hearing
Scoping - what is the aim of the PPP, are there any significant strategic
issues, who are the stakeholders, what is the current state of the
environment.
Sector EIA's are used for the design of sector investment programs.
Rapid EIA achieves this through the collection of ‘one season’ data,
which ever is stressful for the project, only to reduce the time required.
The Rapid EIA is a widely used methodology, which would mainly use
available data along with baseline Environmental data collected for one
season (preferably winter), for evaluating all possible impacts on the
components of Environment.
Winter season is considered as the critical meteorological situations for
Air Pollution, when the mean air temperature is too low and average
wind speed will also be less, this condition limits the dispersion of
gaseous pollutants in atmospheric air thus increasing the Ground level
Concentrations (GLC) of pollutants
Comprehensive EIA (CEIA)
Comprehensive EIA would be required if the assessment area, period and
parameters are insufficient for a well-defined decision on the
establishment of a project.
This is done to minimize the effort, expense and delay in project planning.
The standard TOR have been developed by the inputs from experts and have
been recommended by the EACs of the respective sectors.
All the agencies responsible in the developmental project and the EIA study.
A description of the existing environmental conditions in the project site and surrounding
areas.
The stakeholders that will be benefited and harmed by the fulfillment of the project.
The impacts, both positive and negative, the project will have on the environmental and
social aspects of the project area. This is undertaken through checklists, matrices or
networks.
A list/description of the species endemic to the area, which are likely to be effected.
How in-depth does the EIA study need to be: whether baseline data is
available or whether the study be sourced from secondary data.
Possible alternatives for the project in terms of design, site, technology,
implementation, etc.
The legal requirements of the project and future legislation that need to be
drafted.
If the project site comes under special categories, and the legislation
regarding the same.
Recommended mitigation strategies.