S K Agarwal
S K Agarwal
S K Agarwal
We need Energy
Convenient to Use Versatile Comparatively Safe at end-use Its demand is growing much faster than that for the Overall Energy
Electricity Consumption
Per-Capita Electricity Consumption has a direct relationship with Human Development
13066
7007
7816
8044
2471 553
1379
South Korea Japan OECD USA
Coal, Gas Hydropower, Nuclear Power, Oil and Renewables- biomass, wind energy, solar energy, etc
No of Units in Operation:439 Total Installed Capacity: 371671 (MWe) No of Units under Construction: 30 Total Installed Capacity: 23414
(Source: IAEA)
Source: IAEA
Source: IAEA
Source: IAEA
kg 1 kg 1 kg 1 kg
Typical Fossil and Nuclear sites: 14 km Solar thermal or photovoltaic (PV) parks: 2050 km (a small town)
Global
Warming & Climate Change Acid Rain Hole in Ozone Layer Air Quality Degradation
460 400
410 279
200 0 4 30
75
11
30
116 37
Coal
Wind
If the electricity produced worldwide by nuclear reactors were instead generated by burning coal, an additional 2600 million tones of carbon dioxide would be released into the atmosphere each year. This can be compared with the target of a 5% reduction (600 million tones per year) in carbon dioxide emissions by the year 2010, as agreed in 1997 at Kyoto just for the developed countries.
Radiation Doses
Life Threatening Dose is illustrated as height of Eiffel Tower, Dose limit for Occupational Worker as height of man Dose limit for public as thickness of a brick
Ash (40 %) :2900 Te Fly Ash (2 %) : 58 Te Lead (50 ppm), Arsenic (10ppm), Uranium, Natural Thorium, Radium 226 present in ash. CO2 : 13680 Tones SO2 : 47 Tones CO : 12 Tones
level wastes : 0.7m3 Intermediate level wastes : 0.05m3 (Spent resins etc.) High level waste : 0.003m3 (Reprocessing for Pu & unused Uranium recovery) It is Vitrified, to be deposited in deep stable geological formation Gaseous effluent No toxic or green house gases. Some low level radioactive gases without public health significance. Total radiation dose received is less than 1% of the Natural background radiation level.
Waste Strategies
Atmosphere Radioactive Waste
Partial Removal to Solid Waste
Toxic Pollutants Volume Reduction Solid Waste Surveillance & Monitoring Shallow or Deep Ground Disposal
SO2
NOx
Dispersion Strategy
Confinement Strategy
Three Stage Nuclear Power Program Closed Fuel Cycle First Stage has reached a level of maturity 540 MW and 700 MW reactors of Indigenous design Second Stage: 500 MW PFBR under construction 3rd Stage AHWR : Construction expected to start in next 1 to 2 years
Indigenous
Project 1. KAPP 3&4 (2X700 MWe PHWRs) 2. RAPP 7&8 (2X700 MWe PHWRs) 3. 7NP 5&6 4. 7NP 7&8 (2X700 MWe PHWRs) (2X700 MWe PHWRs) Construction Start 2008-09 2009-10 2011-12 Pre- Project
Imports
Project 1. KK 3&4 2. JAITAPUR 1&2 3. KK 5&6 4. LWR 11&12 5. JAITAPUR 3&4 Construction Start 2007-08 2008-09 2010-11 2010-11 2011-12
20000
14380
19780
12680
9280
7280
7280
7280
10000
7280
7280
7280
5000
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18
3360
3360
4120
4120
4780
4780
5780
5780
6780
6780
7280
8680
10380
11780
13180
23180
40380
45000
41180
37180
40000
4 0 ,0 0 0 M W e in a b o u t n e x t 1 0 y e a rs 4 0 ,0 0 0 M W e b y 2 0 2 0
29380
35000
30380
30000
3 0 ,0 0 0 M W e b y 2 0 2 0
25000 MWe 23380
20000
2 0 ,0 0 0 M W e b y 2 0 2 0
13980
15000 10280 10000 5780 5000 3360 4120 6780 6780 8280
13380
14380
15380
16380
17780
17780
10980
0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Ye a r 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
18380
Capability in Nuclear Power from mining to waste disposal Highly trained man power.
Highly Experienced industry for all type of work like Civil, Piping, Mechanical, Electrical for construction, supply and erection. Many experts in the nuclear field, who are working for IAEA for safety mission, preparation of codes and guides etc.
FINANCIAL CAPACITY
Current Reserves and Surpluses Rs 8,060 crores (US $ 1800 million) Additional Surpluses in next five years : Rs 10,300 crores (US $2300 million ) Debt Equity in future projects 2 : 1 Capacity to take up projects upto Rs 55,000 crores(US $12000 million Translates to additional capacity of about 10,000 MW
( b) Geological Considerations
Competent strata exist Adequate sub soil investigation ( 6 boreholes during siting) Seismic logging of foundation strata Evaluate for slope instability ( such as land slide , land erosion) Evaluate for existence of mines , oil wells , subsidence
maximum daily rainfall series - 1000 year return period flood evaluated from annual maximum flood series - Design Basis Flood calculated from worst combination of events
(e) Possibility of Shoreline erosion (f) Loss of ultimate heat sink Failure of down stream dam 7 days storage is provided
2.
THANK YOU