0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views

Module00 01 Intro

This document discusses why managing health and safety is important. It provides three key reasons: costs (financial loss from accidents), humanitarian and moral reasons (preventing injury and death), and avoiding prosecution (complying with laws). It details examples of accident costs for businesses, increasing insurance costs, examples of lawsuits and fines, and emphasizes that good management and compliance can help avoid legal issues.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views

Module00 01 Intro

This document discusses why managing health and safety is important. It provides three key reasons: costs (financial loss from accidents), humanitarian and moral reasons (preventing injury and death), and avoiding prosecution (complying with laws). It details examples of accident costs for businesses, increasing insurance costs, examples of lawsuits and fines, and emphasizes that good management and compliance can help avoid legal issues.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25

Module 00

Introduction

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Module 01
Why Manage Health & Safety

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Why Manage Health & Safety?

 Costs (Financial Loss)

 Humanitarian and Moral reasons

 To Avoid Prosecution

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Reason 1 - Cost
 Workplace accidents cost between 2-3% of
GDP (about the same as the cost of all of
defence)
 30 Million days lost each year
 Cost of failure is not easy to calculate,
but includes:
 accident investigation, replacement
labour, loss of reputation, compensation,
insurance.

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
The Costs of Accidents at Work
HS(G)96
 HSE APAU - studied and costed in
depth accidents and incidents at 5
selected organisations
 they came up with surprising findings
 Losses as high as 37% of profits,
8.5% of the tender price, 5% of
running costs

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Employers Liability Insurance
 Insurance is
increasingly expensive
£1  Claims have increased at
about twice the rate of
premium increases
£8 - £36  Limited liability which
may be linked to
performance
 Compulsory in most
cases

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Employers Liability Insurance
 Insurers now selective
 “No longer how much to insure, but can we
insure ?”
 Only well managed risks will obtain cover

 Litigious climate
 escalating claim cost, 12% p.a. last 5 years

 Increased claims frequency


 Increased awareness and ease of access

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Example of cost - Stress
 In November 1994 the High Court
found Northumberland County Council liable
for psychiatric damage Walker suffered
as a result of work related stress.
 Walker settled for £175,000 (less than
asked for).
 Existing legal principles apply to
psychiatric as well as the physical health of
employees.

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Influence of Trades Unions
 UNISON helped members claim more
than £6.5 million pounds in
compensation during the three month
period - January to March 1997.
 £185,000 awarded to a charge nurse who injured
his back lifting a 17 stone patient.
 £100,000 awarded to an auxiliary nurse who was
left unable to iron, hold a phone or write in comfort
and was a chronic insomniac for two years.

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
£500m bill for miners’ vibration
white finger injuries
 In August 1998 three Court of Appeal Judges
dismissed an appeal by British Coal, 20,000
cases are currently pending.
 British Coal should have known about the
problems by 1st January 1973 and should have
taken preventative action within twoyears.
 Current awards range from £50,546 to £5465

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
The Safety and Health Practitioner March 1999

Costs - Fines
Heathrow tunnel collapse
Following the collapse of a section of the Heathrow
Express rail link on 21 October 1994
 Balfour Beatty - fined £700,000 + £100,000 costs
 tunnelling sub-contractor - £500,000 +£100,000 costs
 consultant continually ignored warning signs preceding the
collapse and it was alleged the self monitoring system between
the parties involved was flawed - during the hearing they were
described as “the watchdogs who failed to bark”.

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Reason 2 - Humanitarian

2000/01 Total fatalities to members


© CHSS 2003
of the public = 447
Ref: SC/086/V1
New cases reported in 1996/97

Reason 2 - Humanitarian

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Professor Julian Peto.
The Safety and Health Practitioner March 1999

250,000 asbestos deaths


 Over the next 25 years 250,000
employees are expected to die following
asbestos exposure.
 The peak is expected around 2018 - 2020
with 9000 per year compared to 5000 in 1998.
• 1 in 150 of all men born between 1945 and
1950 will die of mesothelioma.
• The risk for those born after 1955 is not yet
known.

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Reason 3 - Law
 The Director and Production
Manager of Calder Felts Ltd, a
major textile company in
Sowerby Bridge, Yorkshire
were sent to prison for
eight months.
 A 21 Year old employee lost
an arm during a machinery
cleaning operation & the men
ignored a prohibition notice
served by the HSE.
 The Company was also fined.
© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Director Imprisoned.
 In 1997 Company director James Hodgson of
Jackson Transport (Ossett) Ltd, was been
imprisoned for 12 months and fined £1500 for the
manslaughter of a 21 year old employee, who was
sprayed in the face with toxic chemicals.
 Hodgson’s conviction was in addition to a
conviction for corporate manslaughter which
resulted in his company being fined £22,000.

April 1997 HSIB

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
The capsize of the Herald of Free
Enterprise
 "All concerned in
management, from the
members of the Board of
Directors down to the
junior superintendents,
were guilty of fault…
 From the top to the bottom
the body corporate was
infected with the disease
of sloppiness."

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
What Law Enforcers Look For
 Managers who manage.
 Records of effective risk assessment.
 Plans, strategies and robust management
systems for dealing with risk.
 Effective communication and consultation.
 Well organised employees who know their
responsibilities.
 Evidence of monitoring and continuous
improvement.

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Plan - Do - Check - Act

P D
Step 1 Step 2
Establish standards Implement plans to
for health & safetyl achieve objectives
management based and standards
on risk assessment
and legal
requirements

Step 4 Step 3
Review against Measure progress
objectives and with plans and
standards and take compliance with
appropriate action standards

A C
© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
HS(G)65
Policy
POLICY development

Organisational
ORGANISING development

AUDIT AND PLANNING &


REVIEW IMPLEMENTING
Developing
techniques of
MEASURING planning, measuring
PERFORMANCE and reviewing

REVIEWING
PERFORMANCE Feedback loop to
improve performance

Information link
CONTROL LINK
© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Policy
 Sets the Organisation & Arrangements for
identifying hazards, assessing risks &
preventing or controlling them.
 Are staff aware, do they understand it?
 Is it compatible with the overall Company policy?
 Is responsibility delegated to competent
individuals?
 Does it indicate to Directors and Managers
how to assess risks and allocate resources?
 Is it a working document?
© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Organising
 Control.
 Directors and Managers must accept and demonstrate a
commitment to the management of Health and Safety.

 Co-operation.
 Consultation demonstrates commitment which leads to co-
operation.

 Communication.
 Needs to flow in all directions.

 Competency.
 needs to exist for recruitment, transfer & training.

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Planning and Implementing
 Generate SMART objectives.
 Identify hazards, assess risks and set
performance standards.
 Establish priorities according to risk.
 Plans for non routine, new work and serious risks.
 Monitoring arrangements to ensure
standards are met.
 Implement plans based on suitable and
sufficient Risk Assessment

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Monitoring
 Directors and Managers may not be aware
of work practices occurring within their
Departments.
 Monitoring needs to be both Proactive and
Reactive.
 HSE Recommend that monitoring systems
be introduced in each Department.

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1
Audit and Review
 Assessment against health and safety
performance standards including law
and company procedures.
 Assessment against specific SMART
objectives.
 Identification of areas where standards
are poor or inadequate.
 Analysis of incident, accident and ill health data.
 Formal review against performance to allocate resources
and implement further changes

© CHSS 2003
Ref: SC/086/V1

You might also like