Chapter 008

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 35

CHAPTER 8

The Efficient Market


Hypothesis

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


8.1 RANDOM WALKS AND THE
EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS

8-2
Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)

Do security prices reflect information


Why look at market efficiency
– Implications for business and corporate
finance
– Implications for investment

8-3
Random Walk and the EMH

Random Walk - stock prices are random


– Randomly evolving stock prices are the
consequence of intelligent investors
competing to discover relevant information
Expected price is positive over time
Positive trend and random about the trend

8-4
Random Walk with Positive Trend
Security
Prices

Time 8-5
Random Price Changes

Why are price changes random


– Prices react to information
– Flow of information is random
– Therefore, price changes are random

8-6
Figure 8.1 Cumulative Abnormal Returns
Before Takeover Attempts

8-7
Figure 8.2 Stock Price Reaction to CNBC
Reports

8-8
EMH and Competition

Stock prices fully and accurately reflect


publicly available information
Once information becomes available,
market participants analyze it
Competition assures prices reflect
information

8-9
Versions of the EMH

Weak
Semi-strong
Strong

8-10
8.2 IMPLICATIONS OF THE EMH

8-11
Types of Stock Analysis

Technical Analysis - using prices and volume


information to predict future prices
– Weak form efficiency & technical analysis
Fundamental Analysis - using economic and
accounting information to predict stock prices
– Semi strong form efficiency & fundamental analysis

8-12
Implications of Efficiency for Active or
Passive Management

Active Management
– Security analysis
– Timing
Passive Management
– Buy and Hold
– Index Funds

8-13
The Role of Portfolio Management in
an Efficient Market

Even if the market is efficient a role


exists for portfolio management:
– Appropriate risk level
– Tax considerations
– Other considerations

8-14
8.3 ARE MARKETS EFFICIENT

8-15
Empirical Tests of Market Efficiency

Magnitude Issue
– Actions of intelligent investment managers are the
driving force
Selection Bias Issue
– The outcomes we observe have been preselected in
favor of failed attempts
– Cannot evaluate the true ability of portfolio
managers
Lucky Event Issue

8-16
Weak-Form Tests: Patterns in Stock
Returns
Returns over short horizons
– Very short time horizons small magnitude of
positive trends
– 3-12 month some evidence of positive
momentum
Returns over long horizons – pronounced
negative correlation
Evidence on Reversals

8-17
Predictors of Broad Market Returns

Fama and French


– Aggregate returns are higher with higher
dividend ratios
Campbell and Shiller
– Earnings yield can predict market returns
Keim and Stambaugh
– Bond spreads can predict market returns

8-18
Semi-Strong Tests: Market Anomalies

P/E Effect
Small Firm Effect (January Effect)
– Invest in low-capitalization stocks
– Earn excess returns

8-19
Figure 8.3 Returns in Excess of Risk-
Free Rate and in Excess of the SML

8-20
Semi-Strong Tests: Market Anomalies
(Con’t)
Neglected Firm
– Small firms tend to be neglected by large
institutional traders
Book-to-Market Ratios
– Beta seems to have no power to explain
average security returns

8-21
Figure 8.4 Average Annual Return
as a Function of Book-to-Market

8-22
Semi-Strong Tests: Market Anomalies
(Con’t)

Post-Earnings Announcement Drift


– There is a large abnormal return on the
earnings announcement day

8-23
Figure 8.5 Cumulative Abnormal Returns in
Response to Earnings Announcements

8-24
Strong-Form Tests: Inside Information

The ability of insiders to trade profitability


in their own stock has been documented in
studies by Jaffe, Seyhun, Givoly, and
Palmon
SEC requires all insiders to register their
trading activity

8-25
Interpreting the Evidence

Risk Premiums or market inefficiencies—


disagreement here
– Fama and French argue that these effects can
be explained as manifestations of risk stocks
with higher betas
– Lakonishok, Shleifer, and Vishney argue that
these effects are evidence of inefficient
markets

8-26
Figure 8.6 Return to Style Portfolio as a
Predictor of GDP Growth

8-27
Interpreting the Evidence (Con’t)

Anomalies or Data Mining


– Rerun the computer database of past returns
over and over and examine stock returns
along enough dimensions:
Simple chance may cause some criteria to appear
to predict returns

8-28
8.4 MUTUAL FUND AND ANALYST
PERFORMANCE

8-29
Stock Market Analysts

Do analysts add value—mixed evidence


– Womack study found that positive changes
are associated with increased stock prices of
about 5%
– Negative changes result in average price
decreases of 11%
– Are prices change due to analysts’ information
or through pressure brought on by the
recommendations themselves

8-30
Mutual Fund Managers

Some evidence of persistent positive and


negative performance
Potential measurement error for
benchmark returns
– Style changes
– May be risk premiums
Superstar phenomenon

8-31
Figure 8.7 Estimates of Individual
Mutual Fund Alphas

8-32
Table 8.1 Performance of Mutual Funds
Based on Three-Index Model

8-33
Figure 8.8 Persistence of
Mutual Fund Performance

8-34
Table 8.2 Two-Way Table of Managers Classified
by Risk-Adjusted Returns over Successive
Intervals

8-35

You might also like