This document discusses different approaches to curriculum planning. It outlines the traditional/systematic approach which encourages learner-centered instruction and willingness to modify curriculum to meet learner needs. It also describes 3 common approaches: 1) The Administrative Approach where administrators identify needs and form committees. 2) The Grass Roots Approach where schools work locally with teachers, administrators, students and parents. 3) The Demonstration Approach which introduces small-scale changes first to minimize disruption. Additionally, it outlines the 7 distinctions of the Michaelis Model for curriculum development, planning, organization, instructional support, teaching strategies and evaluation. Finally, it discusses the Frymier Hawn Approach which emphasizes community and student involvement and evaluates programs based on effectiveness rather than
This document discusses different approaches to curriculum planning. It outlines the traditional/systematic approach which encourages learner-centered instruction and willingness to modify curriculum to meet learner needs. It also describes 3 common approaches: 1) The Administrative Approach where administrators identify needs and form committees. 2) The Grass Roots Approach where schools work locally with teachers, administrators, students and parents. 3) The Demonstration Approach which introduces small-scale changes first to minimize disruption. Additionally, it outlines the 7 distinctions of the Michaelis Model for curriculum development, planning, organization, instructional support, teaching strategies and evaluation. Finally, it discusses the Frymier Hawn Approach which emphasizes community and student involvement and evaluates programs based on effectiveness rather than
This document discusses different approaches to curriculum planning. It outlines the traditional/systematic approach which encourages learner-centered instruction and willingness to modify curriculum to meet learner needs. It also describes 3 common approaches: 1) The Administrative Approach where administrators identify needs and form committees. 2) The Grass Roots Approach where schools work locally with teachers, administrators, students and parents. 3) The Demonstration Approach which introduces small-scale changes first to minimize disruption. Additionally, it outlines the 7 distinctions of the Michaelis Model for curriculum development, planning, organization, instructional support, teaching strategies and evaluation. Finally, it discusses the Frymier Hawn Approach which emphasizes community and student involvement and evaluates programs based on effectiveness rather than
This document discusses different approaches to curriculum planning. It outlines the traditional/systematic approach which encourages learner-centered instruction and willingness to modify curriculum to meet learner needs. It also describes 3 common approaches: 1) The Administrative Approach where administrators identify needs and form committees. 2) The Grass Roots Approach where schools work locally with teachers, administrators, students and parents. 3) The Demonstration Approach which introduces small-scale changes first to minimize disruption. Additionally, it outlines the 7 distinctions of the Michaelis Model for curriculum development, planning, organization, instructional support, teaching strategies and evaluation. Finally, it discusses the Frymier Hawn Approach which emphasizes community and student involvement and evaluates programs based on effectiveness rather than
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12
APPROACHES TO
CURRICULUM PLANNING
Prepared by: Viena V. Manalo & Charisma Panganiban
What is an approach? It is a way of dealing with something, a way of doing or thinking about something . It gives rise to methods , the way of teaching something , which use classroom activities or techniques to help learners learn. What then is a Curriculum? Refers to the lessons and academic content taught in a school or in a specific course or program . CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT MODEL
A. Traditional and systematic approach
Encourages to incorporate learner –centered instruction into everyday interactions to reflect what aspects of a curriculum works well and what needs to be improve , to be willing to modify the curriculum to meet the needs of the learner . 1. The Administrative Approach Approach the superintendent of schools and administrator makes the first move when he realizes the need for curriculum development and set up machinery to make the needed revisions . He arranges for faculty meeting in which the need for curriculum improvement is presented . Then a steering committee is appointed consisting of administrative officers and teachers . This committee formulate general plans , develops guiding principles , and prepare statement of general objectives covering the entire school system. 2. The Grass Roots Approach in its most comprehensive form, the grass roots approach is community -wide. It begins with individual school in each neighborhood. Each school is encouraged to work as a unit in the development of new program . Perhaps the most important feature of this procedure is the teachers , administrator, students and parents of a particular locality can work face to face their common problems . In this approach the function of the central administration is to provide stimulating leadership , free time materials and whatever the various school may need. Commonly use techniques in this approach are the work shop and work conferences . 3. The Demonstration Approach The purpose of this approach is to introduce changes in the regular program on a small scale, thereby holding the disturbance of the faculty and community to a minimum. Since this approach discovers the consequences of a proposed change on a small scale before making the changes in the whole school , it refers the sort of caution associated with an experimental attitude . B. The Michaelis Model By the curriculum planner, teacher and students and the community. The general goal of the curriculum should be cooperatively developed by school personnel and lay persons and be generally acceptable to the community, the objectives should be defended by school personnel with assistance from experts in areas of the curriculum evaluation , and formulation of objectives so that they will be optimally useful in planning and appraisal activities. 7 Distinctions of Michaelis Model 1. Foundation of curriculum development The philosophical foundation may be drawn upon to develop a framework of values and beliefs related to the goals , the selection and use knowledge and means and methods and other dimensions of education. 2. Goals and objectives Each area of the curriculum should be analyzed to identify its specific contributions to the major goals . This step is helpful in developing a coherent curriculum in which all areas or fields of study are viewed as contributing to the common goals. 3. Organization of the Curriculum The decision must be made about curriculum development procedures, broad fields or other organization, the roles of curriculum personnel , and the design of curriculum guide.
4. Organization and extension of the learning environment
A variety of printed materials , audio visual materials, , community resources , learning packages , multi media sets of materials and multi-level materials should be consider .
5. Instructional support services
Consultant and supervisory services are needed to help solve general problem and problems related to areas of instruction, other needed services include those related to instructional media , special education programs and diagnosis and correction of learning difficulties , evaluation and the in-service education and the instructional staff. 6. Teaching strategies There is a need for inductive strategies that include moves from the particular to the general and deductive strategies that include moves from general to the particular.
7. Evaluation and accountability
A comprehensive program of evaluation is needed in which a variety of instruments and techniques are use to evaluate the conceptual, process , skill, and effective outcomes of instruction. C. The frymier hawn approach This curriculum study involves the community, students , organizational actors, content and teachers. The effectiveness question involving evaluation and corrective feedback ,must replace the frequency and efficiency question that are more usually asked about programs, materials and strategies. It lament the fact that because many curriculum workers seem to feel the local school districts cannot realistically hope to compete with foundation – supported, government –sponsored or university backed curriculum development projects , curriculum workers have gradually come to unquestioningly accept the idea that ‘’somebody else’’ should develop curriculum, and that they the curriculum workers will consider and adopt the program which other develop. THANK YOU FOR LISTENING!