0% found this document useful (0 votes)
112 views26 pages

Lesson 4-Management Organization Chart

The document discusses different types of organizational charts that can be used by corporations. It describes 7 types of organizational structures: hierarchical, functional, horizontal/flat, divisional, matrix, team-based, and network. For each type, it provides the key characteristics, as well as the potential pros and cons of that organizational structure. The document aims to provide an overview of common organizational chart types that can be used to structure management and improve coordination within companies.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
112 views26 pages

Lesson 4-Management Organization Chart

The document discusses different types of organizational charts that can be used by corporations. It describes 7 types of organizational structures: hierarchical, functional, horizontal/flat, divisional, matrix, team-based, and network. For each type, it provides the key characteristics, as well as the potential pros and cons of that organizational structure. The document aims to provide an overview of common organizational chart types that can be used to structure management and improve coordination within companies.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

Management

Organization
Chart
Management Organizational
Chart
• For any corporation, organizational charts are essential,
strengthening internal processes and supporting connectivity.
• Improve coordination and collaboration through departments
and the broader organization.
• Boost the exchange of knowledge and teams' flexibility.
Types of Organizational Chart

• For any corporation, organizational charts are essential,


strengthening internal processes and supporting connectivity.
• Improve coordination and collaboration through departments
and the broader organization.
• Boost the exchange of knowledge and teams' flexibility.
1. Hierarchical Org Structure
• The organizational map that is in the shape of a pyramid is classified as
a hierarchical org-chart.
• It's the most popular corporate type.
• The axis of influence goes from high to low.
Pros
• Better distinguishes jurisdiction and accountability standards
• Indicates who each employee refers to or who to speak to about
particular projects;
• Motivates workers with consistent career paths and resources to progress
• Offer a specialization to each employee
• Develop a sense of community between workers of the same unit
Cons
• May slow down progress or make significant adjustments due to
additional bureaucracy
• Can lead workers to work for the department rather than for the entire
business
• May make low-level workers feel like they have no control and can't
communicate their thoughts to the organization.
2. Functional Organizational Structure
• Like a hierarchy system, a functional organization structure begins
from and moves down roles with the highest degree of obligations on
the Top.
• However, workers are grouped mainly according to their expertise and
position within the organization.
• Each department is separately administered.
2. Functional
Organizational
Structure
Pros
• Enables workers to concentrate on their job
• Encourages experience
• Assistance teams and programs are autonomous.
• It can be scaled effectively in any big business.
Cons
• May build silos in a business.
• Interdepartmental coordination restricts
• Obscures procedures and methods in a business for various markets or
goods
3. Horizontal
or flat org
structure
Pros
• Gives additional responsibilities to workers
• Promotes more transparent interaction
• Enhances teamwork and pace of execution of fresh concepts
Cons
• It may produce uncertainty when workers may not have a specific boss
to report to
• Staff members with more straightforward capabilities can be created
• When the organization expands past startup status, it can be hard to
manage.
4. Divisional
Org Structure
Pros
• Helps major firms stay flexible
• Enables a faster response to developments in the market or consumer
needs
• Promotes democracy, freedom, and a personalized strategy
Cons
• Can easily contribute to identical resources
• Muddled or ineffective coordination between the leadership and its
departments.
• It can lead to a business fighting with itself.
5. Matrix Org Structure
Pros
• Allows managers to pick individuals according to a project's needs
quickly
• Gives the enterprise a more dynamic understanding.
• Encourages staff to use their expertise in diverse capacities in addition
to their initial positions
Cons
• Introduces a disagreement between the management of departments
and project managers
• May change more often than other forms of the organizational map.
6. Team-based org structure
Pros
• Increases efficiency, accountability, and openness by cracking down barriers
• Promotes a mentality for success
• Modifies conventional career styles by encouraging individuals to switch
sideways
• Experience of principles instead of seniority
• Needs limited leadership
• Plays best for agile scrum or tiger squad enterprises.
Cons
• Goes against the inherent tendency of specific organizations to a
strictly bureaucratic system.
• Might allow promoting pathways less transparent for workers
7. Network
Org
Structure
Pros
• View the complex network of business on-site and off-site links
• Enables enterprises to be versatile and adaptive
• Give all workers the power to work together, take action, and decide.
• Makes workers and customers appreciate procedures and workflows
Cons
• Can be unnecessarily complicated when interacting with specific off-
site systems
• It may make it more challenging for workers to know who has the final
say.

You might also like