0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Lecture 5 Slides

The document discusses the structure of noun phrases (NPs). It defines NPs as having a head noun that can be modified by determiners, adjectives, and prepositional phrases. While English generally puts determiners first and adjectives before the noun, other languages vary in allowing determiners after nouns or different adjective orders. Some languages also allow double determination using both articles and demonstratives.

Uploaded by

7doboz1csardaban
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Lecture 5 Slides

The document discusses the structure of noun phrases (NPs). It defines NPs as having a head noun that can be modified by determiners, adjectives, and prepositional phrases. While English generally puts determiners first and adjectives before the noun, other languages vary in allowing determiners after nouns or different adjective orders. Some languages also allow double determination using both articles and demonstratives.

Uploaded by

7doboz1csardaban
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

Foundations of Syntax:

Phrases
Nathaniel Torres
BBN-ANG-151
Wednesday, October 18
Review

 Remember that a sentence can be broken up into predicates and arguments.


 John kissed Mary.
 John hit the ball.
 The dog chewed on the bone.
 Each of these clauses has a subject (agent) and an object (patient).
 If we look at the last one, we can see that the internal structure of sentences
can be broken down into smaller parts.
Structure

 Let’s take a look at the last clause again:


 The dog chewed on the bone.
 Specifically, let’s look at the structure of the dog and the bone.
 If we think about it, each of these function as one whole unit.
 We can qualify this by trying to take each word on their own:
 *The chewed the bone.
 *Dog chewed the.
 *The dog chewed bone.
Structure (cont.)

 We can see that trying to isolate words creates issues of grammaticality in the
sentences.
 This would imply that the words coalesce in a kind of “grouping” which we
can call a phrase.
 Let’s take a look at the the dog and the bone.
 Each of these phrases is made up of two distinct elements: an article
(definite) and a noun.
 The question now is which one of the two is the “anchor,” or rather, the one
that creates the phrase?
Structure (cont.)

 When we think about what the main component in a phrase is, we need to
think about what carries the main information or what’s actually being talked
about.
 So, in the dog, the intuitive thing we’re talking about is the four-legged
animal.
 That makes it the main component of the phrase, everything else, modifies it
in some way.
 Dog is a noun, so, we can introduce our first phrase, i.e., the Noun Phrase.
 The article the is used to define the specificity of the dog in question, that is,
we know what dog is being talked about.
The Noun Phrase

 The noun phrase’s primary component is, of course, a noun.


 This noun is called a head.
 Heads are the primary components of any phrase. It is a head that is said to
project a phrase.
 The head’s of these phrases can then cooccur with other elements that are
said to modify them in some manner.
 Let’s look specifically at what we can modify nouns with.
The Noun Phrase (cont.)

 Now we can think about what else we can use to modify the head noun in a
Noun Phrase (NP).
 Let’s start with a simple, baby NP: the house
 We can add to this by inserting a word like big, so, the big house.
 Words like big are called adjectives.
 Is this all we can add to the NP? No, we can add more adjectives.
 The big dark spooky house
 Is that all we can add to modify house?
The NP (cont.)

 No. We can add things after the head noun. Consider:


 The big dark spooky house of scares on the hill by the river
 As we can see, we can add other elements headed by prepositions after the
noun.
 In theory we could add an infinite number of adjectives before the noun and
prepositional elements after the noun.
 This property is known as iterativity.
 Elements in the phrase that can be iterated are not considered to be
necessary in order to interpret the phrase head.
The NP (cont.)

 How about the determiner element?


 We have seen that an article can appear at the start of an NP (both the
definite the and the indefinite a).
 Can we ever remove this element from the NP?
 Yes. Consider the following:
 Cats are the most annoying lovable idiots I can think of.
 We can see that the head noun cats occurs without the need to be modified
by an article.
 This is the only instance in English where nouns can occur without a
determiner.
Determiners in the NP

 Are the articles the only determiners that can appear in the NP?
 Intuitively, no. There are a number of determiners that can occur in the NP.
 For example, there are demonstratives or even pronouns that can appear as
determiners, for example:
 That big dark spooky house on the hill.
 We students can’t ever seem to catch a break.
 Are determiners iterative? No. Only one can appear in a noun phrase.
 *That the big dark spooky house on the hill.
Is the Order of modifiers fixed and are
there variations?
 In English we can see one side of the story.
 Cross-linguistically, there are number of different options and variations with
respect to how an NP can be built up.
 With respect to order, for example, English likes to place adjectives only
before the noun it modifies; so: the big blue house but not *the house big
blue.
 There are, however languages which swap the order modifier placements as
well as do different things with respect to post-nominal elements and
determiners.
 Let’s take a look at some cross-linguistic data.
Adjectives: Not Only Pre-Nominal

 Many Indo-European languages, like English, like to place the adjectives that modify
nouns before the noun that they modify.
 This is not, however, the only place that they may appear.
 Within the Indo-European language family, the Romance languages most famously place
modifying adjectives after the nouns that they modify.
 Consider the following examples:
 Les plus belles filles brunes et françaises
the most beautiful girls brown-haired and French
‘the most beautiful brown-haired French girls’
 Los grandes carros azules y viejos
the big cars blue and old
‘the big old blue cars’
Other orders (cont.)

 We can see for both French and Spanish that there are instances where an
adjective can come before the noun.
 For both languages, these are typically evaluative adjectives, usually
commenting on beauty, age, size, and a few other qualities.
 Other adjectives typically follow the noun as we have seen.
 We can also see that both languages (and other Romance languages) make use
of the definite article as well and, like English, it comes at the start of the
phrase.
 This is, however, not the only possible position of the determiner.
 There are a number of IE languages which make regular use of the article
after the noun.
Post-Nominal Determiners

 Consider the following examples from Romanian and Bulgarian:


 Fat-a frumoasă, deșteaptă și înaltă
girl-THE beautiful smart and tall
‘the tall, smart and beautiful girl’
 Golyama-ta sinja kola
big-THE blue car
‘the big blue car’
 We can see that in both languages that the article comes as a suffix either on
the noun (as in Romanian) or on the adjective itself (Bulgarian).
Double Determination

 There exist language which allow for different strategies regarding the
presence of multiple determiners.
 Recall that we said that in English it was ungrammatical to use more than one
determiner in the NP:
 *That the beautiful red-headed girl.
 However, this property is not universal as there are languages which allow for
so-called double determination.
 This typically means that a language will make use of both a demonstrative
and a definite article in certain constructions.
Double Determination (cont.)

 Consider the following examples from both Hungarian and Swedish:


 A szép vörös hajú lány
the beautiful redhaired girl
‘the beautiful redheaded girl’
 Az a szép vörös hajú lány
that the beautiful redhaired girl
‘that beautiful redheaded girl’
 Den vackra rödhåriga flicka-n
that beautiful redheaded girl-THE
‘The beautiful redheaded girl’
 Den där vackra rödhåriga flicka-n
that there beautiful redheaded girl-THE
‘that beautiful redheaded girl’
Double Determination (cont.)

 We can see a number of different things going on.


 Hungarian looks like English in the first example with respect to the order of
adjectives as well as the article coming at the very front of the clause.
 It deviates from English in that use of the demonstrative requires the
cooccurrence of the definite article resulting in the construction az a, which
English does not have.
 Swedish, although related to English, deviates even further from it for two
reasons:
 It has double determination similar to what we can see in the Hungarian
construction az a, and;
 It also has suffixed articles.
Double Determination (cont.)

 We can see with the Swedish data that the demonstrative changes form as
well in order to express the difference between the demonstrative that is
required when a noun is modified by adjectives, and when the meaning this
or that is implied.
 If the latter meanings are implied then Swedish uses the place adverbs här
and där ‘here’ and ‘there,’ respectively.
 There is a similar usage in dialects of the American South which also employ
this method of demonstratives:
 This here redheaded girl is the sweetest thing you ever did see.
 That there apple pie is about as sweet as a peach in the middle of summer.
 Notice though that using the definite article, even in these constructions, is
still completely ungrammatical.
Prepositions in the Noun Phrase

 For the languages that we have looked at so far, we can see that they are
variable in the position of adjectives and in the treatment of determiners.
 One thing is, however, fairly consistent in the languages that we have
discussed so far: they tend to go after the noun in question.
 Une belle fille brune aux yeux bleus
a beautiful girl brown-haired at the eyes blue
‘a beautiful brown-haired girl with blue eyes’
 o femeie frumoasă din România
a woman beautiful from Romania
‘a beautiful woman from Romania’
Prepositions in the NP (cont.)

 The Romance languages mirror the English in that when prepositions appear
within the NP, they occur after the noun.
 So too in Swedish:
 En vacker flicka i klassen med brillor på huvudet
a beautiful girl in class-the with glasses on head-the
‘a beautiful girl in the class with glasses on her head’
 We see no difference here either. Things get more interesting when we look
at other languages.
Prepositions in the NP (cont.)

 If we take a look at Hungarian, there are constructions that provide us with a more diverse set of data:
 A Péterrel való találkozás
the Peter.with VALÓ meeting
‘the meeting with Peter’
 Az érdekes mondattani témáról való/történő beszélgetés
the interesting syntactic topic.about VALÓ/TÖRTÉNŐ discussion
‘the discussion about the interesting syntactic topic’
 We can see in these cases Hungarian has constructions in which the prepositional phrases in the NP occur to
left of the noun, and not the right.
 This is very common in many languages cross-linguistically, especially those that build their clauses to the
left, not the right (e.g., Turkic languages).
 Hungarian tends to build its sentences to the right, like English, but certain constructions, like the ones
above, are built to the left.
 Note: the use of való and történő in these constructions is required to link the nouns in the prepositional
phrase to the head noun of the NP. They do not contribute a meaning in these constructions.

You might also like