0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views87 pages

ITU Linkbudget

This document discusses link budget calculations for satellite communications. It covers topics such as carrier power, antenna formulas, noise calculations, noise temperature, receiver G/T ratio, and examples of link budget calculations. Logarithmic representation is advantageous for link budgets due to the wide range of values involved. Key factors that impact the carrier-to-noise ratio include transmit power, antenna gains, propagation losses, system noise temperatures, and bandwidth.

Uploaded by

Ritan Das
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views87 pages

ITU Linkbudget

This document discusses link budget calculations for satellite communications. It covers topics such as carrier power, antenna formulas, noise calculations, noise temperature, receiver G/T ratio, and examples of link budget calculations. Logarithmic representation is advantageous for link budgets due to the wide range of values involved. Key factors that impact the carrier-to-noise ratio include transmit power, antenna gains, propagation losses, system noise temperatures, and bandwidth.

Uploaded by

Ritan Das
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 87

LINK BUDGET

CALCULATIONS

Otto Koudelka
Institute of Communication Networks and
Satellite Communications
TU Graz koudelka@t
ugraz.at
PERFORMANCE
• characteristics of
– TX station
– RX station
• propagation
• noise, interference
• characteristics of satellite
NOISE
• noise voltage

 4kTBR
2

un
k = 1.38 10-23 J/K, Boltzmann constant
B... noise bandwidth
R...resistance
T...absolute temperature

• independent of frequency, “white” noise


NOISE
S(f)

f
NOISE
• at very high frequencies thermal
noise vanishes, only quantum noise
remains
• Noise power

N  N 0 B  kTB
UPLINK
EARTH - SPACE

Satellite

Ground Station

Earth
CARRIER POWER
• Inverse square law
• C…Carrier power (S…signal)
• PT…transmit power
• Aeff... effective antenna aperture
• R...distance
• GT...transmit antenna gain

C PT
2 G T Aeff
4 R
ANTENNA FORMULA
• effective aperture
G 2
 
A
Aeff 4

G 4 D 2    2 D 2
 2 4 

2

CARRIER POWER

C  PT GT2 G R  

 2

4 R  4 
 
EIRP  PT G T

L   4R  free-space loss


  
s

2

CARRIER/NOISE RATIO

C C
C  N N  Nk T s B

Signal/noise C PT G T  G R  1

ratio
N  2
T s  kB
 4 R /   
Signal/noise C PT G T  G R  1
 2
density
No Ts  k
 4 R /   
FIGURE OF MERIT
• G/T [dB/K]
• important characteristic for
– satellite
– ground station
LINK BUDGET
CALCULATION
• figures may vary widely
– EIRP high
– free-space loss very high
– receive carrier power very low
• logarithmic representation
advantageous
LOGARITHMIC
REPRESENTATION
• Signal-to-noise ratio [dB]

C
 10 log( TP ) 10 log(T G R
)
N
10 log 4)10
 20log( 
R / log(
10
k) log(
10 G )
Ts
log( B)
C 
 EIRP [dBW L[dB k
[dBJ / K
 [dBHz
G /T
[dB/
N ] ] K] ] ]
C/No
• carrier power / noise density
• Normaliset to 1 Hz noise bandwidth

C 
 [dBW L
s[dB k
[dBJ / K

G /T
[dB/
No ] ] K] ]

EIRP

C/T
• sometimes used in link budgets
• in [dBW/K]
• leaves out k = -228.6 dB(J/K)
• at the end of calculation B, k considered

C 
 [dBW L
s[dB

G /T
[dB/
T ] ] K]
EIRP

Eb/No
• energy contrast ratio
• energy per bit / noise density
• r...rate of information rate (not
necessarily channel rate)

Eb C B

No
N
EXAMPLE (1)
• P = 10 W
• G = 18 dB

EIRP 10log(10) 18  28dBW 


58dBm
Corresponds to 631 W!
EXAMPLE (2)
• free-space loss
• Distance: 1000 km
• f = 438 MHz, = 0.68 m

 4R 
 4 R  

 4 1E 6 
L s
 10 log    20 log    20 log 
 0.68 
  
2

= 145.3 dB
EXAMPLE (3)
• free-space loss, distance = 1000 km
• f = 2.4 GHz, l = 0.125 m

 4R 
 4 R 

 4 1E 6 
L  10 log 
s
  20 log    20 log
  0.125 

2
  
= 160 dB
EXAMPLE (4)
• free-space loss, distance = 1000 km
• f = 8 GHz, l = 0.0375 m

 4R 
 4 R 

 4 1E 6 
L  10 log 
s
  20 log    20 log
  0.0375 

2
  
= 170.5 dB
EXAMPLE (5)
• free-space loss, distance = 1000 km
• f = 8 GHz, l = 0.0375 m

 4R 
 4 R 

 4 2E 6 
L  10 log 
s
  20 log    20 log
  0.0375 

2
  
= 176.5 dB
RECEIVER G/T
• amplifier and antenna

No,v1= Gk(Tant+ T1)

Tant
No,ant= kTant No,v1,in= k(Tant+ T1)
RECEIVER G/T
• cascaded amplifiers and antenna

No,v1= G1k(Tant+ T1)

No,v1,in

Tant No,v2,in= G1k(Tant+ T1)+k T2

No,a
SYSTEM NOISE
TEMPERATURE
• referred to input of first stage

No,v1,in= k(Tant+ T1 + T2/G1)

Friis formula Tsys= Tant+ T1 + T 2/ G 1

T = (F - 1)To
LOSSY SYSTEMS
• lossy lines (e.g. coaxial cables,
waveguides)

• L = input power / output power =


1/G
• Te = Tsource (L - 1)
• if network (resistor) at To : L = F,
T=(F-1).290 = (L-1).290
RECEIVER WITH LOSSY
LINES
G1

G2
T1 T2
Tant
L
T sys  T a n t  LT 2
 TL  L T 1 G1
EXAMPLE
A
• Tant = 150 K
• T1 = 200 K
• G1 = 25 dB
• F2 = 8 dB
• G2 = 40 dB
• L = 1 dB
RESULT A
 LT
T sys  T ant
 T L
 LT 1 2

G1
1

T L  (F 1)290  (L 1)290  (101 0 1)290 


8
75K
T 2  ( F 2 1)290  (101 0 1)290 
1539.8K 1
1.258.1 5 3 9 . 8
T s ys  1 5 0  7 5  2 0 0 .1 0 1 0 25
 10 10

T sys  483K
EXAMPLE B
G1 G2

L
T1 T2
Tant

T sys  T a n t  T 1  T L  L T 2

G1
G1
RESULT B
75 1 .2 5 8 . 1 2553 9 . 8
T s ys  150  200 25 
 1 1
0 0
10 10

Tsys  356K
EXAMPLE C
G2 G1

L
T2 T1
Tant
T sys  T a n t  T  T L 
2

L T1
G2 G2
RESULT C
75 1 .2 5 8 .420 0 0
T s ys  1 5 0  1 5 3 9 .8 40 
 1 1
0 0
10 10
T s ys  1670 K
RESULT C
75 1 .2 5 8 .420 0 0
T s ys  1 5 0  1 5 3 9 .8 40 
 10 10 1 0 10

T s ys  1670 K
CONCLUSION
• Avoid losses in front of LNA
• Use LNA with lowest possible NF
• Use LNA with highest possible gain
SATELLITE ANTENNA
NOISE TEMP.
• Noise from earth
• Noise captured from outer space
• Oceans radiate more noise than land
masses
• Conservative figure: 290 K
G/T (spacecraft)
• Satellite antenna gain: 0 dB

• Tsys = 483 K (from example A)

• G/T = 0 – 10log(483) = - 26.8 dB/K


C/N
• f = 438 MHz
• G T= 18 dB
• P = 10 W = 10 dBW
• R = 1000 km
• G/T = -26.8 dB/K
• B = 200 kHz = 10log(200000) = 53 dBHz
C
N
 EIRP [dBW
]
L
s[dB
]
 G /T
[dB/
k 


K] [dBJ / K ]

C
 28 145.3  26.8  (228.6)  53
B [dBHz]
C/No
• normalized to 1 Hz noise bandwidth

C
 28 145.3  26.8  (228.6) 
84.5dBHz N0
ADDITIONAL LOSSES
POLARIZATION LOSS
• If polarization plane of TX antenna and RX
antenna are misaligned
• Lpol
• If TX and RX are circular: no loss
POINTING LOSS
• antennas not totally aligned
• movement of satellite
• pointing loss,
• Around 0.5…1 dB
• Lpu
ATMOSPHERIC
ATTENUATION
• gaseous absorption in atmosphere
• attenuation by hydrometeors
• depending on rain rate, drop size,
frequency
• Latu
PROPAGATION EFFECTS
• Influence by troposphere
– region up to 15 km
– absorption
– depolarization
• Influence by ionosphere
– much less significant
PRECIPITATION
• rain drop size important
• hail produces very significant
attenuation
• wet snow
• dry snow less critical
PRECIPITATION
• Occurrence of precipitation defined by
percentage of time during which a given
intensity is exceeded
• Rain rate in mm/h
• Different climatic zones
• Measurements necessary for each zone
EUROPE
AFRICA

Q
AMERICAS A

C
B

P
CUMULATIVE STATISTICS
Lat

f>

0.001 0.01 0.1 1.0 % of time


CLEAR SKY ATTENUATION
• Depends on
– frequency
– elevation angle
– atmosphere
• pressure
• temperature
• water vapour content
IONOSPHERIC LOSSES
• Interaction between charged particles
and electromagnetic wave
• Absorption, Faraday rotation,
szintillation
• At microwave frequencies
negligible
• Small effect at VHF/UHF
C/N at SATELLITE

C
N  EIRP 
su
L
pu  Li  pol L  G / T   k 
atu
L L
B
EXAMPLE
• f = 438 MHz
• GT= 18 dB
• P = 10W = 10 dBW
• R = 1,000,000 m
• G/T = -26.8 dB/K
• Lpol = 1.5 dB
• Li = 0.7 dB
• Lpu = 0.5 dB
• Latu = 2 dB
• B = 200 kHz
RESULT
C
N  EIRP 
su
L  L
pu pol  Li L atu  G / T   k 
L B

C
 28 145.3  0.5 1.5  0.7  2  26.8  228.6 
53  26.5dB N
P = 10 W

C
 18 145.3  0.5 1.5  0.7  2  26.8  228.6 
53  16.5dB N

P=1W
DOWNLINK
SPACE - EARTH
Satellite

Ground Station

Earth
SATELLITE EIRP
• Maximum EIRP satellite: specified EIRPsat
• EIRP due to drive level:
EIRP = EIRPsat – Bout Bout…back-off

• Example:
• EIRPsat = -3 dBW (0.5 W into 0 dBi antenna)
EIRP = = -3 – 1 = -4 dBW
EARTH STATION ANTENNA
• noise from sky
• noise from earth
• above 2 GHz: dominant contribution
from non-ionized region of atmosphere
• depends on elevation angle
ANTENNA NOISE

oxygen

water
vapour
f
SKY NOISE TEMPERATURE

4 GHz

elevation angle
AVAILABILIT
Y
• Percentage of time in which defined
QoS is met
• e.g. bit error rate of 10-6 for 99.9 %
• Outage: percentage of time in which
attenuation is too high to meet QoS
• e.g. 0.1 % = 8.76 hours /year
• 0.01 % = 53 minutes /year
AVAILABILIT
Y
• directly related to precipitation time
statistics
CLEAR SKY ATTENUATION
OXYGEN
WATER
VAPOUR
ABSORPTION L

at zenith

f
PROPAGATION
MEASUEREMENTS
• Beacon receivers
• Radiometers
• Radar
• Rain gauge
INCREASE IN NOISE
TEMPERATURE
• Atmosphere: “lossy line”
• Tm … medium temperature, 280 K
• to be added to overall noise
temperature
1
T  (1  )T m
at La t
ATMOSPHERIC
ATTENUATION
• specific attenuation 
in [dB/km]
• l… path length in
• Rp…rain rate
  aR b
p

La t 
l
OVERALL NOISE
TEMPERATURE
• Precipitation:

1
T sys  T ant
 m
 T LN B . La td
(1  )T

L atd
EXAMPLE
• Latd = 2 dB = 10 0.2 = 1.58

• Tatm = (1 - 1/1.58) 280 = 102.8 K


VARIATIONS
• can reach up to 1 dB/s at Ka-band
• slower at Ku-band
• any fade countermeasure technique must
be able to cope with fluctuations
OTHER EFFECTS
DEPOLARIZATION
y

rain
droplet

x
SCATTERING
• on rain cell
• no interference
in clear sky
SCATTERING
• in precipitation
condition:
• attenuation
• scattering

• interference
SCINTILLATIONS
• Variation of refraction index of
atmosphere (troposphere and
atmosphere)
• Refraction index of troposphere
– decreases with altitude
– independent of frequency
FARADAY ROTATION
• Ionosphere introduces a rotation of
linearly polarized wave
– inversely proportional to frequency
– function of electronic content
• varies with time
• planes rotate in same direction for up -
and downlink
• no compensation by rotating feed!
IONOSPHERIC EFFECTS
• can be neglected for normal satcom
systems
• if exact propagation delay matters
(GPS) ionospheric model and effects
must be taken into account
C/N for DOWNLINK
 C   L  L  G / T
   EIRP sat  L pol
 L L sd  pd atd i k 
N

d

e
B

(G / T )e  G R  10 log( T sys )
EXAMPLE
• EIRP = -4 dBW
• Polarisation loss: 1.5 dB
• Pointing loss: 0.5 dB
• Ionospheric losses: 0.7 dB
• LNB noise temperature: 120 K
• Input loss: 1 dB
• Atmospheric attenuation: 2 dB
G/T Earth Station
• calculate system noise temperature

T RX  T L 
T RX  L75T LN1.258
A
*120  2 2 6 K

1
T s ys  50  10 0 . 2 )280  (1.58) * 226 
(1  510.4 K

G / T e 18 10log(510.4)  9.07dB /


Gain of Parabolic Dish

 
 
  2 2 
G  10 2 2

 D   10 log 0.5  2 
log  2   
 3E8 2 
 30.28dB
 2E9
   
C/N
DOWNLINK
C
 N d  sat  L´ pol  L sd L  L  L   G / T   k 
pd atd i
e

EIRP B
 4   4 1E 
L s
 20  20
 R  log
6 
 0.68  145.3dB
log

C 
   4 1.5 145.3  0.5  2  0,7  9.07  228.6  53
 12.53dB

N d
OVERALL C/No
• Composed of uplink and downlink
1 1 1
 C  C 
 C       
 N  N  N  u d

 C  1
  1 1

 N   C   C 
   
 N  N 
u d
EXAMPLE
• Overall C/N

C
 10 1
10 (26.5/10)
10(12.53/10) )
log(
T
C

12.34dB N
INTERFERENCE
• Co-channel interference
• Adjacent channel interference


1 1 1

 C    C  C   C
1

  
 N      I


u d
N N
Eb/No
• Bandwidth = 200 kHz,
• Uncoded, user data rate= 200 kbit/s
• Eb/No = C/N*B/r
• Eb/No = 12.34 dB
• Coded, code rate = ½
• B/r = 200.000/100.000 = 2 = 3 dB
• Eb/No = 15.34 dB
BER
SYSTEM MARGIN
• Min Eb/No= 7 dB (BER = 10-6, 1 dB
implementation loss)

• Margin = Eb/No -Eb/Nomin


• Margin = 15.34 – 7 = 8.34 dB

You might also like