The document discusses rationalism and empiricism in studying lessons. It argues that both perspectives should be used for a holistic approach to learning. When studying history, empiricism is applied through analyzing primary sources, while rationalism is employed early on to grasp logical reasoning. This dual approach allows students to combine logical understanding with practical experiences, enhancing their ability to acquire, retain, and apply knowledge effectively. The document concludes that rationalism and empiricism can both be integrated, as each person's perspectives play a role in how they gain knowledge, and using both results in a well-rounded view.
The document discusses rationalism and empiricism in studying lessons. It argues that both perspectives should be used for a holistic approach to learning. When studying history, empiricism is applied through analyzing primary sources, while rationalism is employed early on to grasp logical reasoning. This dual approach allows students to combine logical understanding with practical experiences, enhancing their ability to acquire, retain, and apply knowledge effectively. The document concludes that rationalism and empiricism can both be integrated, as each person's perspectives play a role in how they gain knowledge, and using both results in a well-rounded view.
The document discusses rationalism and empiricism in studying lessons. It argues that both perspectives should be used for a holistic approach to learning. When studying history, empiricism is applied through analyzing primary sources, while rationalism is employed early on to grasp logical reasoning. This dual approach allows students to combine logical understanding with practical experiences, enhancing their ability to acquire, retain, and apply knowledge effectively. The document concludes that rationalism and empiricism can both be integrated, as each person's perspectives play a role in how they gain knowledge, and using both results in a well-rounded view.
The document discusses rationalism and empiricism in studying lessons. It argues that both perspectives should be used for a holistic approach to learning. When studying history, empiricism is applied through analyzing primary sources, while rationalism is employed early on to grasp logical reasoning. This dual approach allows students to combine logical understanding with practical experiences, enhancing their ability to acquire, retain, and apply knowledge effectively. The document concludes that rationalism and empiricism can both be integrated, as each person's perspectives play a role in how they gain knowledge, and using both results in a well-rounded view.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15
THE PHILOSOPHICAL
PERSPECTIVE OF THE SELF
GROUP 8 PRESENTATION RATIONALISM AND EMPIRICISM QUESTION #1
WHEN YOU ARE STUDYING OR REVIEWING
LESSONS, ARE YOU MORE LIKELY TO TAKE THE RATIONALIST VIEWPOINT OR EMPIRICIST VIEWPOINT? WHY? • Both rationalism and empiricism, because in acquiring knowledge provides a holistic approach. Rationalism aids in comprehending complex concepts and logical deductions, especially in fields like philosophy and mathematics. In contrast, empiricism emphasizes real- world experiences and practical examples, enhancing understanding through hands-on applications, notably in scientific disciplines. This combination of perspectives enriches the learning process by offering diverse ways to explore and internalize knowledge. QUESTION #2 How do you apply empiricism and / or rationalism in studying your lesson? Be specific and concrete.
Try to remember your habits and how you
remember your lessons. • In our approach to studying lessons, we make use of both empiricism and rationalism to ensure a comprehensive understanding and effective retention. When studying a subject like history, we apply empiricism by delving into primary sources like historical documents, artifacts, eyewitness accounts, photographs, and recordings. Analyzing these firsthand sources provides me with direct insights into the events, people, and contexts of the past. This empirical approach helps us form a more accurate and authentic understanding of historical events. • On the other hand, we employ rationalism in the early stages of learning. We focus on grasping the logical reasoning behind the subject matter. For instance, when studying, we read the lesson first and use reason and logical understanding to comprehend it. Once we've established a solid foundation in reasoning, we transition to an empiricism approach. We relate the subject to our personal experiences or real-life scenarios, creating visual concepts that make it easier for us to remember terms, definitions, or the purposes of various topics. Overall, this dual approach allows us to combine logical understanding with practical experiences, enhancing our ability to acquire, retain, and apply knowledge effectively. QUESTION #3 Is it possible to make use of both philosophical approaches? Why or why not? • Absolutely, it is entirely possible to integrate both philosophical approaches, empiricism and rationalism, in the pursuit of knowledge. These approaches are not confined to specific individuals or groups; each person's unique perspective and preferences play a role in how they acquire knowledge. Combining empiricism and rationalism allows one to harness the strengths of each approach. Employing both approaches results in a well-rounded and comprehensive understanding of various subjects and situations. This integration permits the consideration of both objective observations and subjective insights, facilitating a more holistic and informed perspective. • Additionally, the use of both approaches is particularly valuable in arguments and knowledge acquisition. Empiricism supports and fortifies arguments by providing different reliable and relevant pieces of evidence and sources, aligning with the rationalist viewpoint. Moreover, these approaches can be simultaneously employed for studying or conflict resolution, as they contribute to a more efficient and balanced decision-making process in various aspects of life, be it in education or personal matters. In essence, the combination of empirical knowledge, logical reasoning, and experiential learning enriches the process of acquiring knowledge, ensuring a well-rounded and effective approach to understanding the world around us. OUR PHILOSOPHY OF THE SELF • Our philosophical statement on the sense of self embraces the principles of both rationalism and empiricism. We believe that in the pursuit of knowledge, these philosophical approaches offer a holistic and effective perspective. Rationalism serves as a valuable tool for comprehending complex concepts and logical deductions, particularly in fields like philosophy and mathematics. On the other hand, empiricism's emphasis on real-world experiences and practical examples enhances understanding, especially in scientific disciplines. • Furthermore, our statement highlights that these philosophical approaches are not limited to specific individuals or groups. Each person's unique perspective and preferences play a role in how they acquire knowledge. Combining empiricism and rationalism allows for a well-rounded and comprehensive understanding of various subjects and situations. The use of both approaches is particularly useful for studying and conflict resolution, contributing to more efficient and balanced decision-making in various aspects of life. • In summary, our sense of self encompasses both rationalism and empiricism as valuable tools for acquiring knowledge and understanding the world. By combining these approaches, we aim to achieve a holistic, well-informed, and effective perspective on various subjects and situations. MEMBERS:
• Danilo B. Alvarado Jr.
• Leahlyn Dara San Juan • Valerie Nuñez • Belinda E. Tuscano THANK YOU FOR LISTENING!