Cephalometric Lecture-2

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 64

CEPHALOMETRICS

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

• To be able to recognize the diagnostic tools of an orthodontist


• To know the components of an orthodontic diagnosis and the radiographs used in
diagnosis
• To be able to know Cephalometrics and cephalograms
• To recognize and apply the uses of Cephalometry
• To understand how to take a cephalogram
• To understand the history of Cephalometrics
• To be able to identify and define hard tissue landmarks
• To be able to identify and define soft tissue landmarks
• To know the different planes used in orthodontic diagnosis
DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS IN
MEDICNE
DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS
OF AN
ORTHODONTIST
ORTHODONTIC DIAGNOSIS

• CLINICAL EXAMINATION
• Extra-oral
• Intra-oral

• RADIOGRAPHS
• Lateral Cephalograms
• OPG
RADIOGRAPHS

• LATERAL CEPHALOGRAMS
• OPG
Cephalometric Study in
Orthodontics
SKELETAL
EVALUATION
Sagittal
Vertical
SAGITTAL
EVALUATION
SAGITTAL EVALUATION

SNA
(82± 2°)
SNA
• SNA - 80-84° normal range

• SNA > 85°


prognathic maxilla

• SNA < 79°


retrognathic maxilla
SAGITTAL EVALUATION

SNB
(80± 2°)
SNB
• SNB - 78-82° normal range

• SNB > 83°


prognathic mandible

• SNB < 77°


retrognathic mandible
SAGITTAL EVALUATION

ANB
(2°±2)
ANB

• SAGITTAL CLASSIFICTION

• ANB 0-4 CLASS I


• ANB >4 CLASS II
• ANB <0 CLASS III
SAGITTAL EVALUATION

WITS
(-1, 0mm)
SAGITTAL EVALUATION
X
CRANIAL BASE
MAND.CORPUS

X
X+7

X+7
VERTICAL
EVALUATION
VERTICAL EVALUATION

S-N/Go-Gn

(32±4°)
VERTICAL EVALUATION

S-N/ANS-PNS
6±4
VERTICAL EVALUATION

S-N/Occl P
17±4
VERTICAL EVALUATION

MMA= 25
VERTICAL EVALUATION

SADDLE ANGLE
N-S-Ar (123±5°)
VERTICAL EVALUATION

ARTICULAR ANGLE
S-Ar-Go (143±6°)
VERTICAL EVALUATION

GONIAL
ANGLE
Ar-Go-Me
(123±7°)
VERTICAL EVALUATION

Y axis 66
VERTICAL EVALUATION

JARABAK
RATIO

Post. facial height x100 62 - 65


Ant.facial height
=
VERTICAL EVALUATION

ANS Me x 100
NM
= 55
DENTAL ANALYSIS
PROCLINATIONS
RETROCLINATIONS
DENTAL EVALUATION

1 PP

108 ±2
DENTAL EVALUATION

1 SN 102

IMPA
Incisal Mandibular Plane
90
Angle
DENTAL EVALUATION

INTER
INCISAL
ANGLE

135±5

131
DENTAL EVALUATION
U1-NA
Angle 22°
mm 4mm

Li-NB
Angle 25°
Mm 4mm
DENTAL EVALUATION

HOLDAWAY
RATIO

I - NB = 1

Pog- NB 1
SOFT TISSUE
ANALYSIS
SOFT TISSUE ANALYSIS

Nasolabial
Angle 102±5
SOFT TISSUE ANALYSIS

S LINE

Upper lip: 0±2


Lower lip: 0±2
SOFT TISSUE ANALYSIS

E LINE
upper lip -3±-2
Lower lip -2±-2
CEPHALOMETRICS
STEINER’S
ANALYSIS

TEMPLATE SASSOUNI’S
ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

HARVOLD &
Mc NAMARA
WITS
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
STEINER’S ANALYSIS

• Emphasized not just on the individual measurements but their


interrelationship into a pattern
• divided the measurements into groups
2. SASSOUNIS ANALYSIS

• The Sassouni analysis was the first to emphasize


• vertical relationships
• horizontal relationships
• the interaction between vertical and horizontal proportions.
• Sassouni pointed out that the horizontal anatomic planes—
• the inclination of the anterior cranial base
• Frankfort plane
• palatal plane
• occlusal plane
• and mandibular plane—tend to converge toward a single point in well-
proportioned faces
HARVOLD ANALYSIS
• Describes the severity or degree of jaw
disharmony
• Harvold developed standards for the “unit
length” of the maxilla and mandible
• The maxillary unit length - the posterior
border of the mandibular condyle to the
anterior nasal spine
• The mandibular unit length -from the
same point to the anterior point of the chin
WITS ANALYSIS

• The Wits analysis was conceived


primarily as a way to overcome
the limitations of ANB as an
indicator of jaw discrepancy. It is
based on a projection of points A
and B to the occlusal plane,
MC NAMARAS ANALYSIS
RADIOGRAPHS
LATERAL CEPHALOGRAMS
OPG
PA CEPHALOGRAMS
OPG
• Condyles
• Hard tissue pathology
• Bone loss
• Number of teeth
• Impacted/missing/supernumary
• Nolla stages –dental age
NOLLA STAGES OF
TOOTH DEVELOPMENT
Stages of calcification
PA CEPHALOGRAM
GRUMMONS ANALYSIS

You might also like