Defamation in Law of Torts
Defamation in Law of Torts
Defamation in Law of Torts
• In any action for defamation, the person defamed must establish that the
defamatory words or the statement referred to him.It should be proved by
the plaintiff that the statement was aimed at him. The m, intention of the
defendant is immaterial.
1. Justification or truth
2. Fair Comment
3. Privilege
Justification of Truth
• In defamation there cannot be better defence than that of truth, as the law will not
permit a man to recover damages in respect of any injury and character which he
either does not or ought not to possess. The defence is still available even though
the statement is made maliciously. Defence is available if the statement is
substantially correct though incorrect in respect of certain minor details.
The second defence to an action for defamation is that the statement was a fair
comment in public interest. Comment means expression of an opinion.
The essentials of this defence are:
a. It must be a comment, i.e. expression of opinion
b. Comment must be fair
c. Comment must be in public interest
Privilege
• This is also one of the fundamental principles that there are circumstances when
freedom of speech has privilege and even if it is defamatory it is protected. The
individuals right to reputation is subordinate to the privilege of freedom of speech.
This privilege may be; Absolute or Qualified.
Absolute and Qualified Privilege
• Absolute Privilege - No action lies for the defamatory statement even though the
statement is false or has been made maliciously.
• Occasions of Absolute Privilege
1. Parliamentary proceedings –Art 105(2)
2. Judicial proceedings
3. Military and naval Proceedings
4. State proceedings
• Qualified Privelege - It is necessary that the statement must have been without
malice. The defendant has to prove that statement was made on a privileged
occasion fairly.
Thank you !