Transformer Paralleling

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25

TRANSFORMER PARALLELING

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 Why Parallel Transformers?
Additional Capacity
Standardization of Transformer Ratings
 Security/Local Back Up
Improved Access for Maintenance

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 User Issues
Voltage / Ratio Mismatch
 Impedance Mismatch
 Unbalanced Loads
Volt/Current Sensors Connected in phase
Incompatible Controllers
Increased Fault Currents

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 Consequences of Improper Paralleling
Unequal Load Sharing
Excessive Circulating Currents
Transformer Overloading
Transformer Loss of Life Due To Overheating
Excessive LTC Operation
 High Maintenance Costs
Lower Transformer Reliability
Voltage Complaints

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 Impedance Design

 for Load Sharing When Paralleled

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 PARALLEL OPERATION CASE 1
 Different Cooling Classes
Bank A 10/12.5 MVA; Z @ 10 MVA base = 0.08/unit
Bank B 12/16/20 MVA; Z @ 12 MVA base = 0.08/unit
On the same base (12.5 MVA)
Bank A 10/12.5 MVA; Z @ 12.5 MVA base = 0.10/unit
Bank B 12/16/20 MVA; Z @ 12.5 MVA base = 0.083/unit
Transformers share load inversely to the ratio of the bank to
the sum of the impedances of the banks in parallel.
Bank A Loading = ZB/(ZA+ZB) = 0.83/(0.10+0.083) = 0.454/unit
Bank B Loading = ZA/(ZA+ZB) = 0.10/(0.10+0.083) = 0.546/unit
Note: Since the max rating of Bank A is 12.5 MVA and it
carries 0.454/unit of substation capacity:
The max total load of bank A and B
12.5/0.454 = 27.5 MVA.
Therefore, the max loading of Bank B
is 27.5 – 12.5 = 15.0 MVA (less than 20 MVA rating).

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 PARALLEL OPERATION CASE 2
 Different Cooling Classes
Assuming that Bank A exists and the need is to purchase and install a new
transformer rated 10/12.5 MVA to operate in parallel with Bank A while
providing a substation capacity of 32.5 MVA.
The specified impedance of the new transformer for Bank B is determined as
follows to utilize the full nameplate capacity of both transformers when they are paralleled.
* Bank A: 10/12.5 MVA; Z @ 20 MVA base = 0.16/unit
* Anticipated total load = 32.5 MVA
* Bank A’s rated per unit load capacity of 12.5 MVA is:
12.5/32.5 = 0.385/unit of the total bank loading of 32.5 MVA.
•Bank B’s rated load capacity of 20 MVA is 20/32.5 = 0.615 per unit of the
paralleled bank rating of 32.5 MVA; therefore Bank B’s impedance needs to
be calculated to carry 0.615 per unit of the bank capacity.
Bank B loading 0.615 per unit = 16/(16+X) and solving for X.
X=0.10 per unit on 20 MVA base.

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 CFVV - Constant Flux Voltage Variation
 Load Tap Changer Operation
LTC operation regulates the transformer secondary by increasing or
decreasing the turns in the secondary winding while the primary winding turns
are constant.

Load Tap Changer is installed in the LV winding to vary the output


by varying the turns in the LV winding.

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 VFVV - Variable Flux Voltage Variation
 Load Tap Changer Operation
LTC operation regulates the transformer secondary by increasing
or decreasing the turns in the primary winding while the secondary winding
turns are constant.

Load Tap Changer is installed in the HV winding resulting in a


variable flux regulation.

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 Paralleled Transformers
 Two or more transformers
connected in such a manner
that they share in the supply of
a common load bus.

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 Three Major Premises
 The transformers must continue their basic function of
controlling the regulated bus voltage as prescribed by the basic
settings on the control.

 The tap changers must operate to maintain tap position so as to


minimize the current that circulates between them.

 These functions must operate correctly and automatically


regardless of system configuration changes or breaker operations.

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 Difficulties
 TIMING ERROR: One
Tap changer faster than other
(tolerances)– causes one
transformer to do all voltage
regulation

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 Difficulties
 VOLTAGE ERROR:
One tap changer voltage magnitude
higher than other – causes one
transformer to do all raising and
other do all lowering

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 Effects of “off-tap” positions
 Develops Circulating current =
Reactive Power or Vars
(ΔV in reactive circuit)
----------------
Results in unbalanced
transformer loading
-----------------
Circulating current calculation

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED
CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED
CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED
CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED
CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED
 Master/Follower Method
(Direct operation technique)

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 Circulating Current Method

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 Application

 Z% Matched Transformers

Different tap sizes

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 Conclusion

 Several methods of paralleling to choose from depending on


needs of the application

In choosing consider :


– all possible configurations
– all future possibilities

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


 References

 IEEE Guide for Transformer Paralleling

J & P Transformer Book

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED


THANK YOU

CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED

You might also like