Minitab
Minitab
Module - 3
Detailed Contents
Module - 3
Module - 3
Chapter – 1 – Data analysis using Minitab
1. Introduction to Minitab
Sessions Window
Data Window
! Warning
If not saved as Project file, all the
analysis results will be lost
• Is
used for switching windows
containing different analysis
Used to access
sessions window
Module - 3
Chapter – 1 – Data analysis using Minitab
Type the data for the Multi-spindle data given in training material Slide number: 172
Save the ‘Worksheet’ using File -> Save Current worksheet option. Give a suitable name
Part to Part
Tooling to Tooling variation
variation
• When we are find out the Stream to Stream variation in Multi-vari analysis, we are
checking whether one stream is different from the other stream based on the “Averages
of the stream values”
•Some times, we may also have to check whether the “Variation” within the one stream
is same as “Variation” within another stream. (Eg: variation within all the spindles are
same are different)
•This will also give us the clue about whether something is wrong in any stream or not
•To do this, we will be doing the “Test of Equal variances”
•Use this tool, when the conclusion in Multi-vari analysis shows that “Part to Part
variation” is highest and we have to further investigate whether are there any
differences within the streams in the Part to Part variation
•The methodology is discussed in the next slides
Select
Stat -> ANOVA -> Test
of equal variances
Test for Equal Variances for Response • The analysis shows that
95% Confidence Intervals for Sigmas Factor Levels
the variations within all
J1 the jigs are same and
Bartlett's Test there is no difference in
J2
Test Statistic: 17.481
the variation
P-Value : 0.008
J3
J4
Levene's Test
J5
Test Statistic: 1.512
J6 P-Value : 0.172
J7
2 3 4
Module - 3
Chapter – 1 – Data analysis using Minitab
Linear equation
Module - 3
Chapter – 1 – Data analysis using Minitab
Module - 3
Chapter – 1 – Data analysis using Minitab
Sl no A B C Response
Table speed Rod feed Weld
(RPM ) (mm/min) current( in
amps)
1 - - - 10 , 9.80 , 9.30
2 + - - 9.0
3 - + - 9.3
4 + + - 9.30
5 - - + 10.5
6 + - + 10
7 - + + 9.80
8 + + + 8 , 7.50 , 7.70
•Select “Factors”
•Type the name of the
parameters
•Type the “Actual” low and
high settings
•Select “Options”
•Deselect “Randomize
runs”
•Select “Low/High”
•Select “OK”
•Even though we do not do
anything in this screen, we
have to do this step, since
there is a logical problem in
the software
•Click “Graphs”
•Select “Pareto”
•Click “Results”
•Select “Coefficients and
ANOVA table”
•Select Option
•Select “Draw full
interaction plot matrix”
9.6
Response
9.4
9.2
9.0
Tab speed Wire feed Current
9.5
60
9.0
51
Current 10.0
9.5
180
9.0
145
•Select ‘Contours’
•Feed the Lower and Upper
boundary
•Calculation of the Upper
and Lower boundary
procedure is given in the
next slide
•Select Setup
•Feed the Lower boundary
•Feed the Upper boundary
•Feed the Target value as
(Upper boundary + Lower
bounday)/2
•By default, the goal should
always be ‘Target’
•By default, Weight should
always be 1
Module - 3
Chapter – 1 – Data analysis using Minitab
• Steps are exactly same as the steps we did for Optimization of single
response, except that we have to key in all the responses and do the analysis
by selecting all the responses
•Let us use the data given below for Multiple response optimization
Module - 3
Chapter – 2 – Problem Definition tools
(Define Phase tools)
Phase II
Process flow diagram - To clearly understand the Process sequence Analytical
and come up with list of SSV’s
Calibration - To find out the instrument related variation Data based
Gage R&R studies - To find out the variation due to method of Data based
checking
Module - 3
Chapter – 2 – Problem Definition tools
120 DE-BURRING
130 SHAVING
140 INSPECTION
2-2
Step : 2 – Identifying Desired 3
Outcomes
To ensure that all the possible outcomes are captured think of the
outcomes in the following categories. After writing the outcome, also
identify the category it belongs to
There are five categories of outcomes that we have to think of when we
are writing the desired outcomes for every process step
Blue Print (BP) – Outcomes that are dimensional and are the final
dimensions for the customer
In-process (IP) – Outcomes that are dimensional and are stage dimensions
and will get processed further
Engineering Specifications (ES) – Outcomes that are properties of material
(Physical, metallurgical, chemical, mechanical)
Visual Parameters (VP) – Outcomes that are checked visually (eg: surface
defect, rust, dents, grinding marks etc..)
Geometric dimensions (GD) – Parameters that are shape related
Form Controls
Flatness Straightness Roundness Cylindricity
Orientation Controls
Perpendicularity
( Squareness) Angularity Parallelism
Location Controls
Composite Controls
2-2
Step : 2 – Identifying Desired 3
Outcomes
Sq.no Process step Incoming source of variation Symbol Desired outcomes Type Process characteristics
110 HOBBING 1.SPAN SIZE I.P.
2.P.C.D. R/O GD
3.ROOT DIA. B.P.
4.LEAD OF GEAR TOOTH I.P.
5.PROFILE OF GEAR TOOTH I.P.
6.NO. OF TEATH B.P.
7.SEMI TOPPING ON TOOTH B.P.
8.SURFACE FINISH ON TOOTH I.P.
FLANK
ROOT FILLET RADIUS B.P.
2-2
Step : 2 – Identifying Desired 3
Outcomes
Desired outcomes has to be identified for all the process
steps listed for the Part number selected
After we had identified the outcomes of all the process,
mark the process step where the Problem is generated. There
may be more than one process steps that are generating the
problem
The next analysis in the Process mapping has to be done
only for the Marked process steps and not for all the process
steps
2-2
Step : 2 – Identifying Desired 3
The next analysis should be done only for Process step no. 130
2-2
Step : 3 – Identifying Incoming 3
sources of variations
List down all the raw material defects/variations
that are coming based on the data/experience
Ask the question “out of this, which are all the
problems that are going to affect the “desired
outcomes” of the process under analysis
Write the incoming variations, only if the raw
material defects/variations are going to affect the
desired outcomes of the process
2-2
Step : 3 – Identifying Incoming 3
2-2
Step : 3 – Identifying Incoming 3
sources of variations
Second type of incoming sources of variation are the problems coming
from the “previous process steps”
The outcomes of “all the previous process steps” can come as a problem
to the Process step under analysis
Assume there are no inspections and these will come to the process step
under analysis
Identify the previous process step “outcomes” which will affect the
“Desired outcomes” of the process step under analysis
When writing the Previous process step outcomes as incoming sources
of variation, also write the process step within bracket
2-2
Step : 3 – Identifying Incoming 3
sources of variations
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION - BULL GEAR (6M) PART NO. - 05080000
PROC. PROC. INCOMING SOURCES OF PROC.FLOW DESIRED OUTCOMES / IDENTITY- PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS /
NO. DESCR. VARIATION DIAGRAM PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS FICATION PARAMETERS
10 BLANK CUTTING 1.BLANK LENGTH I.P.
2.PERPENDICULARITY OF FACE I.P.
2-2
Step : 3 – Identifying Incoming 3
sources of variations
70 FINAL BORING/ 1.BORE DIA. I.P.
FACING 2.BOSS THICKNESS I.P.
3.THICKNESS OF RIM I.P.
4.STEP HEIGHT BOSS/RIM B.P.
5.CHAMFER B.P.
2-2
Step : 3 – Identifying Incoming 3
sources of variations
Sq.no Process step Incoming source of variation Symbol Desired outcomes Type Process characteristics
110 HOBBING 1.SPAN SIZE I.P.
2.P.C.D. R/O I.P.
3.ROOT DIA. B.P.
4.LEAD OF GEAR TOOTH I.P.
5.PROFILE OF GEAR TOOTH I.P.
6.NO. OF TEATH B.P.
7.SEMI TOPPING ON TOOTH B.P.
8.SURFACE FINISH ON TOOTH I.P.
FLANK
ROOT FILLET RADIUS B.P.
2-2
Step : 3 – Identifying Incoming 3
sources of variations
• Identify the Incoming sources of variations also for the
previous process steps which have “marked outcomes”
•These will give input for identifying the second level SSV’s
when we are doing funneling in M&A Phase
2-2
Step 3: Incoming sources of 3
variation
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION - BULL GEAR (6M) PART NO. - 05080000
PROC. PROC. INCOMING SOURCES OF PROC.FLOW DESIRED OUTCOMES / IDENTITY- PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS /
NO. DESCR. VARIATION DIAGRAM PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS FICATION PARAMETERS
10 BLANK CUTTING 1.BLANK LENGTH I.P.
2.PERPENDICULARITY OF FACE I.P.
variation
70 FINAL BORING/ 1.BORE DIA. I.P.
FACING 2.BOSS THICKNESS I.P.
3.THICKNESS OF RIM I.P.
4.STEP HEIGHT BOSS/RIM B.P.
5.CHAMFER B.P.
Sq.no Process step Incoming source of variation Symbol Desired outcomes Type Process characteristics
110 HOBBING OD RUNOUT (080) 1.SPAN SIZE I.P.
OD SIZE (090) 2.P.C.D. R/O I.P.
3.ROOT DIA. B.P.
4.LEAD OF GEAR TOOTH I.P.
5.PROFILE OF GEAR TOOTH I.P.
6.NO. OF TEATH B.P.
7.SEMI TOPPING ON TOOTH B.P.
8.SURFACE FINISH ON TOOTH I.P.
FLANK
ROOT FILLET RADIUS B.P.
characteristics
This is the most important step which will
help us in getting all the possible SSV’s
Write the Process characteristics only for the
“marked process step” (Process step where
the problem is generated) to start with
Process characteristics for the other process
steps can be listed based on the results of the
funneling in M&A phase
Category Parameter
Process Parameter a. Pouring temperature
b. Pouring time
c. Clamping pressure
d. Hydraulic oil temperature
e. Closing pressure
f. Heating time
g. Cushion pressure
h. Alphin bath temperature
i. Alphining time
Category Parameter
Processing material a. Coolant contamination
b. Pointage of the cleaning media
c. Ph of the phosphating bath
d. Viscosity of draw oil
e. Core strength – Nail hardness value
Category Parameter
Work environment related parameters a. Noise
b. Vibration
c. Humidity
d. House keeping
e. Lighting
f. Dust
Sq.no Process step Incoming source of variation Symbol Desired outcomes Type Process characteristics
110 HOBBING 1.SPAN SIZE I.P.
2.P.C.D. R/O I.P.
3.ROOT DIA. B.P.
4.LEAD OF GEAR TOOTH I.P.
5.PROFILE OF GEAR TOOTH I.P.
6.NO. OF TEATH B.P.
7.SEMI TOPPING ON TOOTH B.P.
8.SURFACE FINISH ON TOOTH I.P.
FLANK
ROOT FILLET RADIUS B.P.
sequencing
Manufacturing process
Normal sequence
Alternate sequence
Inspection
Storage
Exercise # 1
Module - 3
Chapter – 2 – Identification of controls for
all the ssv’s listed in problem definition
Control Planning
STEP
SHAVING SPAN SIZE 1.MATERIAL HARDNESS CHECK 5 SAMPLES EVERY LOT (INCOMING) NIL
VARIATION 2.SPAN SIZE (110) CHECK 1 SAMPLE EVERY 10 SAMPLE IN PROCESS 110 NIL
3.P.C.D. R/O (110) CHECK 1 SAMPLE EVERY 50 SAMPLES IN PROCESS 110 NIL
4.SURFACE FINISH OF TOOTH FLANK NIL NIL
SHAVING SPAN SIZE 1.MATERIAL HARDNESS 8 CHECK 5 SAMPLES EVERY LOT NIL
(INCOMING)
100% inspection
VARIATION 2.SPAN SIZE (110) CHECK 1 SAMPLE EVERY 10 NIL
using Micrometer by
SAMPLE IN PROCESS 110
Operator
3.P.C.D. R/O (110) CHECK 1 SAMPLE EVERY 50 NIL
SAMPLES IN PROCESS 110
4.SURFACE FINISH OF TOOTH NIL NIL 5 pcs every 2 hours
FLANK check by QA
5.MINOR DIA. (090) CHECK 1 SAMPLE EVERY 50 NIL
Pre-dispatch
SAMPLES IN PROCESS 90
inspection - 10 nos
6.O.D. R/O (090) NIL NIL
every lot
7.UNFILL (030) 100% VISUAL CHECK IN 30 NIL
8.O.D. OF SHAVING CHECK ONCE IN TWO MONTHS REPLACE MANDREL
MANDREL EVERY YEAR
9.R/O ON O.D. OF SHAVING CHECK ONCE IN TWO MONTHS REPLACE MANDREL
MANDREL EVERY YEAR
10.R/O ON THE CENTERS IN CHECK AT THE TIME OF SETTING NIL
MACHINE
11.CUTTING OIL NIL NIL
TEMPERATURE
12.CLAMPING PRESSURE NIL NIL
Characteristics Methods
Part/ Machine Device Jig. Special
Process Name/ Operation Evaluation
Sample
Process Tools for Characterist Product/ Process
Description No. Product Process Measurement Control Method
Number Manufacturing ic Class Specification Tolerance Frequen
Technique size
cy
130 Gear Shaving MB Gear shaver 1 Span size 135.47/135.52 Micrometer 100% - Inspection
Micrometer 5 2 hrs Inspection
10 Lot Inspection
1.MAT ERIAL
HARDNESS
Hardness tester 5 Lot Inspection
2.SPAN SIZE
(110)
Micrometer 1 10 Inspection
3.P.C.D. R/O (110) Dial 1 50 Inspection
4.SURFACE
FINISH OF
T OOT H FLANK
5.MINOR DIA.
(090)
Micrometer 1 50 Inspection
6.O.D. R/O (090) Micrometer 1 50 Inspection
7.UNFILL (030) Visual 100% - Inspection
8.O.D. OF
SHAVING Micrometer Once 2 mth Checking
MANDREL
9.R/O ON O.D. OF
SHAVING Once Year Replace
MANDREL
10.R/O ON T HE
CENT ERS IN Dial Once Setting Inspection
MACHINE
11.CUT T ING OIL
T EMPERAT URE
12.CLAMPING
PRESSURE
Team
Created by:
Characteristics Methods
Special
Evaluation
Sample
Characteris t Product/ Process Reaction Plan
Product Proces s ic Clas s Measurement Frequen Control Method Resp. Recording (Y/N)
Specification Tolerance s ize
Technique cy
Span size 135.47/135.52 Micrometer 100% - Inspection Opr No Segregate and keep
Micrometer 5 2 hrs Inspection QA Yes Hold, reinspect
10 Lot Inspection QA Yes Hold the lot, reinspect
1.MAT ERIAL
HARDNESS
Hardness tester 5 Lot Inspection IQA Yes Hold the lot, reinspect
2.SP AN SIZE
(110)
Micrometer 1 10 Inspection 110 Yes Segregate and keep
3.P .C.D. R/O (110) Dial 1 50 Inspection 110 Yes Segregate and keep
4.SURFACE
FINISH OF Perthometer 1 shift Inspection 110 Yes Hold the lot, reinspect
T OOT H FLANK
5.MINOR DIA.
(090)
Micrometer 1 50 Inspection 90 Yes Segregate and keep
6.O.D. R/O (090) Micrometer 1 50 Inspection 90 Yes Segregate and keep
7.UNFILL (030) Visual 100% - Inspection 30 No Segregate and keep
8.O.D. OF
15
SHAVING Micrometer Once Checking Maint Yes Replace the mandrel
MANDREL days
9.R/O ON O.D. OF
SHAVING Once Year Replace Maint Yes -
MANDREL
10.R/O ON T HE
CENT ERS IN Dial Once Setting Inspection Opr No Correct and recheck
MACHINE
11.CUT T ING OIL
T EMP ERAT URE
Thermometer Once Shfit Checking Opr No Inform Maintenance
12.CLAMP ING
P RESSURE
Pressure gage Once 2 hrs Checking Opr No Inform Maintenance
Exercise # 2
End of Module - 3
Training Kit