Lecture 6 Quine-Mccluskey Method
Lecture 6 Quine-Mccluskey Method
Quine-McCluskey Method
• A systematic simplification pro
cedure to reduce a minterm exp
ansion to a minimum sum of pr
oducts.
• Use XY + XY’ = X to eliminate
as many as literals as possible.
– The resulting terms = prime impli
cants.
• Use a prime implicant chart to s
elect a minimum set of prime i
mplicants.
Chap 6 C-H 1
Determination of Prime
Implicants
Eliminate literals
Two terms can be combined if they
differ in exactly one variable.
AB’CD’ + AB’CD = AB’C
10 10 +1011 = 101
X Y X Y’ X
Chap 6 C-H 2
Sorting to Reduce
Comparisons
Sort into groups according to
the number of 1’s.
F(a,b,c.d) = Σm(0,1,2,5,6,7,8,9,10,14)
• No need for comparisons
– (1) Terms in nonadjacent group
– (2) Terms in the same group
Group 0 0 0000
Group 1 1 0001
2 0010
8 1000
Group 2 5 0101
6 0110
9 1001
10 1010
14 1110
Comparison of adjacent
groups
– Use X + X = X repeatedly between adjacent groups
– Those combined are checked off.
– Combine terms that have the same dashes and differ
one in the number of 1’s. (for column II and column
III)
Chap 6 C-H 4
Prime Implicants
• The terms that have not been ch
ecked off are called prime impli
cants.
f = 0-01 + 01-1+011- + -00-
+ -0-0 + --10
= a’c’d + a’bd + a’bc + b’c’ +
b’d’ + cd’
• Each term has a minimum number of
literals, but minimum SOP for f:
f = a’bd + b’c’ + cd’
(a’bd, cd’ => a’bc)
(a’bd, b’c’ => a’c’d)
(b’c’, cd’ => b’d’)
Chap 6 C-H 5
Definition of Implicant
– Definition
• Given a function of F of n variables,
a product term P is an implicant of F
iff for every combination of values o
f the n variables for which P = 1, F is
also equal to 1.
– Every minterm of F is an implicant of F.
– Any term formed by combining two or
more minterms is an implicant.
– If F is written in SOP form, every produ
ct term is an implicant.
– Example: f(a,b,c) = a’b’c’ + ab’c’
+ ab’c + abc = b’c’ + ac
– If a’b’c’ = 1, then F = 1, if ac = 1, then
F = 1. a’b’c’ and ac are implicants.
– If bc = 1, (but a = 0), F = 0, so bc is not
an implicant of F.
Chap 6 C-H 6
Definition of Prime Implicant
– Definition
• A prime implicant of a function F is
a product term implicant which is no
longer an implicant if any literal is d
eleted from it.
• Example: f(a,b,c) = a’b’c’ + ab’c’ +
ab’c + abc = b’c’ + ac
– Implicant a’b’c’ is not a prime implica
nt. Why? If a’ is deleted, b’c’ is still an
implicant of F.
– b’c’ and ac are prime implicants.
• Each prime implicant of a function h
as a minimum number of literals tha
t no more literals can be eliminated f
rom it or by combining it with other
terms.
Chap 6 C-H 7
Quine McClusky Proced
ure
• QM procedure:
– Find all product term implicants
of a function
– Combine non-prime implicants.
• Remaining terms are prime
implicants.
– A minimum SOP expression consists of
a sum of some (not necessarily all) of
the prime implicants of that function.
• We need to select a minimum set of prime
implicants.
– If an SOP expression contains a term
which is not a prime implicant, the SOP
cannot be minimum.
Chap 6 C-H 8
Prime Implicant Chart
• Chart layout
– Top row lists minterms of the function
– All prime implicants are listed on the left side.
– Place x into the chart according to the minterms that
form the corresponding prime implicant.
• Essential prime implicant
– If a minterm is covered only by one prime implicant,
that prime implicant is called essential prime
implicant. (9 & 14).
» Essential prime implicant must be included in
the minimum sum of the function.
Chap 6 C-H 9
Selection of Prime
Implicants
Cross out the row of the selected essential
prime implicants
The columns which correspond to the
minterms covered by the selected prime
implicants are also crossed out.
Select a prime implicant that covers the
remaining columns. This prime implicant is
not essential.
Chap 6 C-H 10
A Cyclic Prime Implicant
Chart
• Two or more X’s in every column.
• F = m(0,1,2,5,6,7)
– F = a’b’ + bc’ + ac. (by try and error). No
guarantee for this to be minimum.
Chap 6 C-H 11
Another Solution
• F = a’c’ + b’c + ab
• Each minterm is covered by two diff
erent prime implicants.
Chap 6 C-H 12
Petrick’s Method
• A more systematic way to find all minimum
solutions from a prime implicant chart.
• P is True when all the minterms in the chart
have been covered. P = f (P1, P2, …)
• Label each row with Pi.
– Pi is true when the prime implicant in row Pi is
included in the solution.
– For column 0, we must choose either P1 or P2 in
order to cover minterm 0. Thus (P1 + P2) must be
true.
Chap 6 C-H 13
Petrick’s Method (cont.)
• For column 0, we must choose either P1 or P2
in order to cover minterm 0. Thus (P1 + P2)
must be true.
• To cover minterm 1, P1 + P3 must be true, and
etc.
• P = (P1+P2)(P1+P3)(P2+P4)(P3+P5)(P4+P6)(P5+P6) = 1
• This means: We must choose row P1 or P2, and row
P1 or P3, and row P2 or P4, etc.
Chap 6 C-H 14
Petrick’s Method (cont.)
• Then we simplify
P = (P1+P2)(P1+P3)(P2+P4)(P3+P5)(P4+P6)(P5+P6)
= (P1 + P2P3)(P4 + P2P6)( (P5 +P3P6);
(X+Y)(X+Z) = X +YZ)
Chap 6 C-H 15
Simplification of Incompletely
Specified Functions
• An incompletely specified function
Chap 6 C-H 16
Simplification Using Map-
Entered Variables
Chap 6 C-H 17
Map-Entered Variable
• F(A,B,C,D) = A’B’C + A’BC + A’BC’D +
ABCD + (AB’C), (don’t care)
– Choose D as a map-entered variable.
– When D = 0, F = A’C (Fig. a)
– When D = 1, F = C + A’B (Fig. b)
» two 1’s are changed to x’s since they are
covered in Fig. a.
• F = A’C + D(C+A’B) = A’C + CD + A’BD
Chap 6 C-H 18
General View for Map-
Entered Variable Method
Chap 6 C-H 19