Study On Automatic Generation Control of Two Area by Gain Optimization
Study On Automatic Generation Control of Two Area by Gain Optimization
TURBINE:
GOVERNER:
GENERATOR:
AGC OF A TWO AREA SYSTEM:
Under steady state operation, the transfer of power over the Ptie can be written as:
Where δ12 = δ1 −δ 2 and X12= X1+ X2+X12 i.e Where E1 and E2 are the magnitudes of the end voltages of
control areas 1 and 2 respectively, and δ1 and δ2 are the voltage angles of E1 and E2, respectively.
AREA CONTROL ERROR:
• The Automatic Generation Control (AGC) is achieved by the area control error (ACE)
which is function of frequency and tie line flow of the system. If one area is changing its load then the
difference represented by load and
generation area is called ACE.
• It guarantees that each area, in steady state, absorbs its own load. In the control strategy each area of an
interconnected system tries to regulate its area control error (ACE) to zero.
• Whenever the ACE is greater than zero, it means that the area is over generating and thus needs either to decrease
generation or to sell more. Likewise, whenever the ACE is less than zero, the area is under generating and thus needs
either to increase generation or to buy more. AGC works to keep the ACE close to zero.
CONSTRAINTS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION:
• Governer Deadband:
1. Deadband of governor is defined as it is the range of speed, only after which governor starts
responding.
2. Mathematically, It can be said that deadband is inversely proportional to sensitivity of the governor.
3. To avoid the hunting of governor and for stable operations,there should be a limited percentage of
deadband.
4. The nonlinearity due to governor dead band is modeled using the Describing Function, and the
approximate solution for representing backlash is given by:
where, DB is the dead band. For this study, N1 = 0.8 and N2 = -0.2 is considered
• Generation rate constraint:
1. In practical steam turbine systems, due to thermodynamic and mechanical constraints, there is a limit to the
rate at which its output power (dPg/dt) can be changed.This limit is referred to as generator rate constraint
(GRC).
2. In order to project physical constraints, a generation rate limitation of 0.1 p.u. per minute (i.e. 0.00 [7 p.u.
MW per second) for thermal areas and 4.5% per second for hydro unit are considered.
3. The negative effect of GRC becomes more important when it combines with the speed governer
deadband(GDB),and hence system may not regain its nominal value in a specified time(determined by relay
settings) and hence the protective devices and relays react.
4. Presence of both these limit the immediate response of the power system to reject disturbances.
BOILER DYNAMICS:
• Oil/gas fired boiler system has been considered, where such boilers respond much quickly during sudden load
demand compare to coal fired units.
• In boiler dynamics, four different control strategies or modes are available. Such as boiler leading, turbine
leading ,coordinated boiler turbine and sliding pressure control.
• In conventional steam units, changes in generation are initiated by turbine control valves and the boiler
controls respond with necessary immediate control action upon sensing changes in steam flow and deviations
in pressure.
• Boiler modes appear only in the time response of the variables inside the boiler control loops.
• The boiler effect on the variables outside the boiler model is negligible.
• Only when the boiler is loaded close to its nominal output is its effect pronounced.
CONCLUSION:
• The governor dead band is has a considerable effects on the amplitude of oscillations
and its settling time.
• Generator rate constraint is also considered to limit the generator output,which also
has considerable effect as desired area frequency deviation will be deteriorated
• The area frequency and tie-line power oscillation due to small load change are found to
persist for a long time for considering nonlinearity, they are kept as smaller as plausible
by optimizing the gain parameters.
• On the basis of performance index, the optimization of the gain parameters is done.
• Optimization of gain parameters and frequency bias paramters lead to reduction in the
effects caused by the non-linearities such as governer deadband(GB) and governer rate
constraint(GRC),thus leading to better performance of AGC.
REFERENCES
1. Masrur, Hasan & Ferdoush, Asif & Rabbani, M.G.. (2015). Automatic Generation
Control of Two Area Power System with Optimized Gain Parameters..
10.13140/RG.2.1.1435.7520.
2. E. B. Shahrodi and A. Morched, "Dynamic Behaviour of AGC Systems Including the
Effects of Nonlinearities," in IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol.
PAS-104, no. 12, pp. 3409-3415, Dec. 1985, doi: 10.1109/TPAS.1985.318870.
3. S. C. Tripathy, R. Balasubramanian and P. S. C. Nair, "Effect of superconducting
magnetic energy storage on automatic generation control considering governor
deadband and boiler dynamics," in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 7, no. 3,
pp. 1266-1273, Aug. 1992, doi: 10.1109/59.207343.
4. J. B. X. Devotta, M. G. Rabbani and S. Elangovan, "Effect of SMES unit on AGC
dynamics," in International Conference on Energy Management and Power Delivery,
Singapore, 3-5 Mar. 1998.
5. E.B. Shahrodi, "Modelling and analysis of AGC systems", N.A.Sc. Thesis,
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Toronto, January 1981.
6. C. Concordia, L.K. Kirchmayer, E.A. Szymanski, "Effect of speed-governor
deadband on tie-line power and frequency control performance", AIEE . Trans. on
Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. 75, pp. 429-435, August 1957
REFERENCES
7. F.P. deMello, R.J. Mills and W.F. B'Rolls, "Automatic generation control, part I:
process modelling", IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-92, pp. 710-715, MarchApril
1973.
8. IEEE Committee, "Dynamic models for steam and hydro turbines in power systems
studies", IEEE Trans., vol. PAS-92, pp. 1904-1915, Nov./Dec. 1973.
9. S. C. Tripathy, G. S. Hope and O. P. Malik, "Optimization of load frequency
Parameters for power system with reheat steam turbines and governor deadband
nonlinearity," in lEE proceeding, vol. 129, pp.
10. 16,1982. 10. O. I. Elgerd, Electric energy system theory: an introduction, 2nd ed.,
Tata McGrawHill Book Company, New Delhi, 1983