0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views34 pages

Emile Durkheim

Emile Durkheim was a French sociologist interested in how social order is maintained. He viewed society as a complex system made up of interdependent parts. Durkheim established sociology as a science and argued that society has a reality greater than just the sum of individuals. He studied social facts like religion, crime, and suicide to understand how social structures integrate individuals into society and maintain social cohesion. Durkheim analyzed the shift from traditional to modern industrial societies and how this impacts social solidarity.

Uploaded by

Louraine
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views34 pages

Emile Durkheim

Emile Durkheim was a French sociologist interested in how social order is maintained. He viewed society as a complex system made up of interdependent parts. Durkheim established sociology as a science and argued that society has a reality greater than just the sum of individuals. He studied social facts like religion, crime, and suicide to understand how social structures integrate individuals into society and maintain social cohesion. Durkheim analyzed the shift from traditional to modern industrial societies and how this impacts social solidarity.

Uploaded by

Louraine
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 34

Emile Durkheim

France
1858–1917
Society: Moral Order
Durkheim was interested in the question of social (moral)
order
• How social order is achieved and maintained amidst
social and economic change
• Views society as a complex system of component parts:
o Parts interdependent
o Parts interrelated
• All parts necessary for the functioning of society as a
whole
• Structural functionalism
Scientific Sociology
• Sociology: “science of civilization” (HN 149)
• Sociology, the study of social facts
• Social facts: Social phenomena that are
o External to the individual
o Collective, independent of the individual
• Beliefs, tendencies, and practices of the group taken
collectively
• Not just statistical facts; social facts more encompassing
• Ways of acting, thinking, and feeling shape, structure,
and constrain individual and social behavior
Sociology: Study of Society
Society is greater than the sum of individuals who
comprise society
• Society has its own reality – social relations,
organizations, collective social forces
• These comprise a distinct collective reality; a sui
generis reality
How Should We Study Society?
• We study society by studying social facts
• We study social facts by considering social facts as
things
• Social facts have an objective (thing-like) existence in
society
o They can be studied objectively
o Their objective manifestations can be observed
o Indicators of a thing – of any social phenomenon –
can be substituted when the phenomenon itself
cannot be directly observed
Studying Social Facts
• Following Durkheim, sociologists use measures or
indicators of various phenomena in their research
• We cannot directly see social integration, but it can
be measured using indicators assessing
o Individuals’ social ties to others
o Their frequency of interaction with others
o Their participation in various social/community
groups
Social Facts and Social Problems
• All social facts are amenable to objective study
• All social facts can be studied independent of the sociologist’s
attitudes toward the phenomenon being studied
• Social facts include marriage, divorce, religion, crime,
homelessness, education
• Social “problems” (e.g., homelessness) are sociologically
“normal”
• They are part of social life; have a collective existence; impact
the collective social reality
• Some social problems, though normal social facts, can
become pathological and threaten social order if the
comparative incidence of a particular phenomenon (e.g.,
unemployment) becomes abnormally high
Human Nature and Society’s Nature
• Human appetites are individualistic or self-centered
• All humans have basic selfish biological drives that we
seek to satisfy
• Life in society means that individual appetites have to be
curbed; social life necessitates our responsiveness to
others
• Social life requires that we attach ourselves to
“something other than ourselves”
• Attachment to others – social ties, social bonds –
produces solidarity (social morality); solidarity with the
group/society
• Solidarity maintains society; maintains its order and
cohesiveness
Societal Constraints
• Socialization: Teaches individuals the norms and expectations
of the collectivity
• We habituate to the obligations and customs of the collectivity
• Society imposes its expectations and norms on individual and
collective behavior
• “When I perform my duties as a a brother, a husband or a
citizen …”
• The rules of behavior are society’s rules; they come from
society and constrain social behavior
• Rules, norms, customs, expectations, are all socially inherited;
they collectively exist and are external to, and independent of,
individuals
• The collective force exerted by existing social facts makes social
change difficult; social change can only emerge from society
Societal Transformation
• Different types of societies produce
o Different societal conditions
o Different social facts
o Different forms of social organization
• Traditional versus modern society
• What social forces maintain solidarity, social order,
cohesion, in different types of societies?
Transformation from Agricultural to
Industrial Society

www.youtube.com/watch?v=4As0e4de-rI
Traditional Society
Pre-industrial or rural society/community
• Sameness in social structure and relationships
• Occupational breadth, not specialization
• Shared backgrounds, family, occupational, and
cultural histories
• Overlapping social ties and relationships
Traditional Society
• Strong collective conscience
• Deeply felt shared attachments and beliefs
• Regulated expectations and behavior
• Low level of individualism
• Social control exerted through repressive sanctions
(e.g. gossip)
Mechanical solidarity; a social cohesion produced by
shared overlapping relationships/beliefs.
Modern Society
• A different character, structure, and intensity in
modern urban society than in traditional or rural
communities/societies
• www.nytimes.com/video/2012/07/24/nyregion/100
000001674657/the-subway-shuffle.html
Characteristics of Modern Society
• Industrialization/urbanization/population density
• Geographical and social mobility
• Cultural diversity
• Specialized division of labor
• Requires individualism
• Produces interdependence
Organic solidarity; social cohesion from
interdependence rather than sameness
Division of Labor
• The division of occupational labor as a mechanism
producing worker/social interdependence
• www.bls.gov/soc/home.htm
Social Interdependence
Social interdependence: contractual, but also moral
• Contracts alone do not regulate and produce
interdependence
• Contacts are expressions of social morality; of how
society defines expectations and obligations
• Contracts
o Do not have power independent of society
o Have legitimacy because they reflect and affirm
societal expectations and customs
o Originate in society
o function to protect social relations, society
Summary: Traditional and Modern
Societies
Traditional society Modern society
• Pre-industrial/rural • Industrialized, urban
• Sameness • Diversity
• Strong collective • Weak collective
conscience conscience
• Limited division of • Specialized division of
labor labor
• Repressive, punitive law • Contract-type, restitutive
law
Mechanical solidarity Organic solidarity
Social Conditions and Suicide
Suicide:
• A social fact
• Varies inversely with the degree of social integration
• Durkheim’s sociological study of suicide highlights
o The significance of social interdependence
o How social structures attach individuals to society
o How different social conditions produce different
social consequences
Suicide in Tightly Bound Societies
Altruistic suicide:
• Produced under societal conditions in which
individuals are excessively tied to the society; over-
attachment to social groups
• The strong press of the collective
conscience/community norms
• Becomes obligatory due to loss of honor in the
community (e.g., in Japanese society)
Modern, Egoistical Conditions
Egoistic suicide:
• Societal conditions with a high emphasis on
individualism; self-oriented achievement
• Focus on the self leaves little room for the
development/maintenance of social attachments
• Social relationships and social groups
o Function as constraints against individualist
(egoistic) appetites
o Protect the individual from detaching from society
Constraining Individualist Tendencies

Some social structures/forms of social organization more likely than


others to exert a constraining-integrating force on the individual:
• Marriage
• Parenthood
• Church
o Not religious doctrine per se, but variation in church
structure:
o The Catholic Church has a more layered
communal/hierarchical structure than the Protestant
Church
o Absorbs rather than isolates the individual
o Catholics more tightly integrated than Protestants
o Lower incidence of suicide among Catholics than
Protestants.
Anomic Social Conditions
Anomic suicide:
• Produced by societal conditions of upheaval,
rootlessness
• The norms and anchors in place are disrupted and
overturned by some unanticipated
occurrence/event/crisis, e.g.
o Terrorist attacks
o Natural disasters (earthquakes, hurricane, fires,
tsunamis)
o Rapid economic change (economic recession or
economic growth)
Anomie and Social Cohesion
• Societal anomie, societal disturbance, is not solely
linked to suicide
• Societal anomie can also produce new bonds of
cohesion:
o People want to be with other people
o They unite around a shared grief/common cause
• Independent of social anomie, social abnormalities
or social “problems” (excessive inequality, excessive
individualism) can threaten social cohesion
Religion
• Religion: a social fact
• Interest in the relation between religion and social
integration
• Broad definition of religion, of the sacred
• All societies divide things into two categories:
o Sacred: all things set apart as special; have high
symbolic value; society demands reverence/awe
toward them
o Profane: ordinary or mundane things with no
special symbolic significance
The Sacred
• The sacred and profane are defined by society
• What makes a thing holy/sacred is the collective
feeling attached to it
• Each society/community designates the sacred
through symbols; collective representations
• Symbols are collective representations of a
society’s/community’s shared beliefs/attachments
• Societies/communities unify around shared sacred
symbols
Beliefs and Rituals
The sacred can be identified by
• collectively shared beliefs
• collectively shared rituals
o Church: The collective coming together of people
with shared beliefs and rituals
• a moral community; shared solidarity
We see and experience the sacred at collective
assemblies (e.g., funerals, sports events, national civic
events)
• The affirmation and regeneration of social ties
Science and Religion
• Religion compels us to act in unison together;
compels us to be social
• Religion attaches us to something other than
ourselves; strengthens our individual and collective
life
• Science: creates knowledge
• Religion: creates action, the moral-social remaking of
society; creates solidarities
• Science and religion: separate, interdependent
functions; not incompatible

You might also like