@civil Procedure Code, 1908
@civil Procedure Code, 1908
@civil Procedure Code, 1908
1908
• The sections create jurisdiction while the rules indicate the manner in
which the jurisdiction is to be exercised, the inherent power of the court
to do justice is inadditions to and complementary to the powers conferred
under the Code- Vareed Jacob v Sosamma Geevarghese, AIR 2004 SC 3992 .
• The sections create jurisdiction while the rules indicate the
manner in which the jurisdiction is to be exercised, the
inherent power of the court to do justice is in additions to
and complementary to the powers conferred under the Code
• Vareed Jacob v Sosamma Geevarghese, AIR 2004 SC 3992 .
• The sections under the code can be amended only by the legislature.
• But the orders and rules provided in the First Schedule of the code
can be amended by the High Court. Under section 122, the High Courts
have powers to amend, by rules, the procedure laid down in the orders.
• The sections and the rules, therefore, must be read together and
harmoniously construed.
• However, if the rules are inconsistent with the sections, the sections
will prevail.
Consolidate and Amend
• Pari Materia
• where it plainly amends, resort cannot be had to the earlier law
• Ex Vis Ceribus Actus
Interpretation of the Act
• A statute is an edict of the Legislature
• RMD Chamarbaugwala v. Union of India- the Supreme
Court observed that a statute is to be construed according
to the intention of them that make it.
• The duty of the judicature is to act upon the true intention
of the Legislature the mens or sententia legis.
• The courts are therefore, held as finishers, refiners, and polishers of
legislatures which give them in a state requiring varying degrees of
further processing
• The general rule is that all statutes, other than those which are merely
declaratory, or which relate only to matters of procedure or of evidence, are
prima facie prospective, and retrospective effect is not to be given to them
unless, by express words or necessary implication, it appears that this was
the intention of the legislature. Similarly, the courts will construe a
provision as conferring power to act retrospectively only when clear words
are used
CIVIL PROCEDURE
• Punjab Co-operative Bank v Lala Bikram Lal, AIR 1959 Punj 71
• procedure is a handmaid and not mistress of law and rules of
procedure should only sub-serve and not govern.