Resurgence of Beta Blocker-Focus On HT
Resurgence of Beta Blocker-Focus On HT
Resurgence of Beta Blocker-Focus On HT
Hypertension
Prof. Emeritus Sverre E. Kjeldsen, MD, Dr. Med.
Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway,
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (adjunct), University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Past-President of the European Society of Hypertension
Editor-in-Chief Blood Pressure
COIs: Ad hoc lecture honoraria from Getz, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Sanofi, Takeda and Vector Intas
Antihypertensive Drugs and Outcomes in C-19
N=880
Severe Outcome n=415
(ICU or death)
(Mild Outcome n=465)
100 %
Prevalence of
hypertension after 18 80 %
years of follow-up
60 %
40 %
Hypertensives
20 %
Normotensives
0%
P=.004
3.5 3.5
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
ln A (pmol/L) ln NA (nmol/L)
Reims H, Kjeldsen SE et al, Blood Press 2005
Venous and Arterial Plasma Catecholamines
Untreated Hypertensives Versus Normotensives
50-Year Old Men From the Oslo Study
400 150
* ***
350 125
300
250 100
***
200 75
150 50
100
25
50
0 0
Venous Arterial Arterial Venous
HT (n=61)
11
Diuretic and beta-blocker treatment mainly
Step 2
1 pill Triple combination ACEi or ARB + CCB + diuretic
Beta-blockers
Consider beta-blockers at any treatment step, when there is a specific indication for their use, e.g.
heart failure, angina, post-MI, atrial fibrillation, or younger women with or planning pregnancy
other major drug classes when there are specific clinical situations, e.g.
angina, post-myocardial infarction, heart failure, or heart-rate control.
15
Heart rate ≥ 84 Heart rate ≥ 84
10 Heart rate < 84
Heart rate < 84
8 10
% with event
4 5
0 0
0 12 24 36 48 60 0 12 24 36 48 60
Month Month
Okin PM, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S et al., Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2271
VALUE: Prognostic Impact of In-Treatment Heart Rate
Secondary Prevention I A
Chronic Ischemia I A
Arrhythmias I A
N Favors Favors
Trial (beta blocker) Beta blocker placebo Risk reduction P
BEST Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1659-1667; CIBIS-II Investigators. Lancet. 1999;353(9146):9-13; MERIT-HF Study
Group. Lancet. 1999;353(9169):2001-2007; COPERNICUS. Packer M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1651-1658.
CArvedilol Post-infaRct survIval COntRol in LV dysfunctioN
0.9
Carvedilol
0.85
0.8
0.7
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Years
Lancet 2002;357:1385-1390
MERIT - Total Mortality
Per cent Patients with Reduced EF (< 0.40) and Symptoms of Heart Failure (NYHA II-IV)
20
Placebo
15 p = 0.0062 (adjusted)
p = 0.00009 (nominal)
10
Metoprolol CR/XL
5
Risk reduction = 34%
0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
Months of follow-up
29 The MERIT-HF Study Group, Lancet 1999;353:2001-07
Riemer TG et al. Hypertension 2021;77:1539-1548
2008 ESH Manual of Hypertension Chapter 46
120 5.0
110 4.5
100 4.0
90 3.5
80 3.0
70 2.5
Borderline Hypertension
60 Control Subjects
2.0
14
5th HR quintile and uncontrolled BP Uncontrolled BP /
Other 4 quintiles with uncontrolled BP Highest HR quintile
Cumulative primary event rate
2
BP control < 140/90 mmHg
0
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
Days since year 1
drug combination, preferably in a SPC. Exceptions are frail older patients and
those at low risk and with grade 1 hypertension
(particularly if SBP is < 150 mmHg).
Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 and Eur Heart J 2018, in press
Classification of beta-blockers according to their beta1-selectivity1,2
1. Egan BM, Basile J, Chilton RJ et al. Cardioprotection: the role of beta-blocker therapy. J Clin Hypertens. 2005;7(7):409–16.
2. López-Sendón J, Swedberg K, McMurray J et al. for the Task Force on Beta-blockers of the European Society of Cardiology.
Expert consensus document on beta-adrenergic receptor blockers. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1341-62.
3. 45
Cruickshank J. Nebivolol, a third generation beta-blocker. J Symptoms Signs. 2014;3(5):380-91
Primary Prevention: MAPHY1,2
3234 men 40–64 years old randomized to beta-blocker or thiazide diuretic