3 Assumptions Stat
3 Assumptions Stat
100
80
60
40
20
0
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
• This example compares
student’s achievement
motivation and their GPA.
These two variables have
positive association as GPA
increases, so does
motivation.
• This example compares
student’s GPA and their
number of absences. These
two variables have a
negative association
because in a general as a
student’s number of
absences decreases, their
GPA increases.
INTEPRETING SCATTERPLOTS
Another important component to a scatterplot is the form of the
relationship between two variables.
• Linear Relationship • This example illustrates a linear
relationship. This means that the
points on the scatterplot closely
resemble a straight line. A
relationship is linear if one
variable increases by
approximately the same rate as
the other variables changes by
one unit.
• This example describes a
curvilinear relationship between
the variable “age” and the
variable “working memory.” In
this example, working memory
increases throughout childhood,
remains steady in adulthood,
and begins decreasing around
age 50.
• Scatter plots are useful in revealing the presence of
curvilineary in a relationship.
• Curvilineary, refers to an eyeball gauge of how curved a
graph is.
• Curvilinear relationship is a type of relationship between
two variables where as one variable increases, so does the
other variable but only up to certain point, after which, as
one variable continues to increase, the other decreases.
• If you were to graph this kind of curvilinear relationship, you
will come up with an inverted – U.
• The other type of curvilinear relationship in one where as
one variable increases, the other decreases up to a certain
point, both variables increases together.
• This will give you a U – shaped curve.
• INTEPRETING SCATTERPLOTS: STRENGTH
• The slope provides information on the strength of the
relationship.
• Four things must be reported to describe a relationship:
• 1) The strength of the relationship given by the correlation
coefficient.
• 2) The direction of the relationship, which can be positive or
negative based on the sign of the correlation coefficient.
• 3) The shape of the relationship, which must always be linear
to computer a Pearson correlation coefficient.
• 4) Whether or not the relationship is statistically significant,
which is based on the p-value.
• Meta – analysis, may be defined as a family of techniques
used to statistically combine information across studies to
produce single estimates of the data under study.
• This is used to synthesize summary data from a series of
studies.
• It focuses on deriving the effect size (treatment effect), that
refers to an estimate of the strength of the relationship (or
the size of differences) between groups.
• In typical studies using two groups (experimental group and
the control group), ideally with confidence intervals, is
helpful in determining the effectiveness of some sort of
intervention (such as a new form of therapy, a drug, a new
management approach etc.)
• In practice, many different procedure may be used to
determine effect size and the procedure selected will be
based on a particular research situation.
• Meta analysis facilitates drawing of conclusions and making
statements like
• The typical therapy client is better off than 75% of untreated
individuals (Smith & Glass, 1977, p.752)
• About 10% increased risk for antisocial behavior among
children with incarcerated parents, compared to peers
(Murray et. al., 2012)
• Key advantage: it provides more weight to studies that have
larger number of subjects. This weighting process results in a
more accurate estimates (Hunter & Schmidt, 1990).
• Advantages of Meta Analysis
• Meta analysis can be replicated
• Conclusions of meta analyses tend to be more reliable and
precise than the conclusion from single studies
• There is more focus on the effect size rather than the
statistical significance alone
• It promotes evidence – based practice which may be defined
as professional practice that is based on clinical and research
findings.