Abs
Abs
Abs
Benchmarking
Plating on Plastics
Shivakumar C T
POP Synopsis
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 3
POP Relationships
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 4
POP Basics
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 5
POP Basics
Cleaning(optional)
Cleaning(optional)
Etching
Etching
Chrome Reducer
Chrome Reducer
Pre-Dip
Pd Activator Pre-Dip
Reducer
Pd Activator
Electroless Nickel
Electroless Nickel
Strike Cu
Electrolytic Deposition
Electrolytic Deposition
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 6
POP Basics
Conventional system
Low Pd content
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 7
POP Basics
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 8
POP Basics
Elimination of Strike Cu
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 10
POP Basics
Etch
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 11
POP Basics
Activation
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 12
POP Basics
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 13
Comparison Study of G&W Activators
To start with, comparison of Activator Ultra (POP) with and without effect
Comparison
of mechanical agitationStudy oftemperature
at different G&W Activators
was conducted.
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 14
Comparison Study of G&W Activators
2.95
2.53
1.532 1.53
1.253
0.95
Pd(mg/ft2) with
Pd(mg/ft2) with
Sn(mg/ft2) with
Sn(mg/ft2) with
mechanical agi-
mechanical agi-
mechanical agi-
mechanical agi-
tation
tation
tation
tation
Temp(0C) 28 Temp(0C) 40
Activator Ultra POP Activator Ultra G
Activator POP has got 5 gm/l of Pd conc. where as Ultra G has got 10 gm/l of
Pd conc.
Same parameters were maintained
We can conclude that activator Ultra G has got less consumption value as
compared to POP with same coverage and performance when components of
both the activators were compared
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 15
Comparison Study of Competitor Activators
3.521 3.535
3.326 3.255
1.89
1.53 1.43
1.23
mechanical agita-
mechanical agita-
mechanical agita-
mechanical agita-
Pd(mg/ft2) with
Pd(mg/ft2) with
Sn(mg/ft2) with
Sn(mg/ft2) with
tion
tion
tion
tion
Temp(0C) 28 Temp(0C) 40
Adhemax IN Adhemax SF
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 16
Comparison Study between G&W and Competitor Activators
1.89
1.253 1.532 1.53
Pd(mg/ft2) with mechanical agi-
tation
tation
tation
Kunststof Activator 100 Adhemax IN
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 17
Comparison Study between G&W and Competitor Activators
Comparison Study
Comparison Study of Ac-between G&WStudy
Comparison andofAActivator
Activators
tivators
3.326 3.255
2.95
2.53
1.53
0.95
Pd(mg/ft2) with mechanical
itation
ical agitation
ical agitation
with mechan-
with mechan-
Pd(mg/ft2)
Sn(mg/ft2)
Ginplate Activator Ultra G Adhemax SF
LHS=RHS
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 18
Accelerator
Acceleration:
Tin-hydroxides are removed from the
surface. Pure Palladium functions as
catalyst for E’less deposition
05/20/2023
EFFECTS OF ACCELARATIONS
Comparison between
Performance of Accelerator Accelerators
was tested using GK 120 (Liquid Type).
Activators used: Activator Ultra (POP) and Activator Ultra G.
Test Protocol: Processing of Components – Stripping in Aqua Regia (Nitric
acid : Hydrochloric Acid = 1:3) known area & volume(0.4 sq dm, 40 ml) –
Analysis of Pd & Tin in stripped soln.
Effects of Accelerators
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Pd(mg/ft2) with mechanical agitation
2.6 1.354
1.22 1.18
2.45 1.1
2.4
2.2
Sn(mg/ft2)
Sn(mg/ft2)
01 02 C
or
1
01 02 C 1
S S 34 t 34 or
or or xD er
a rS rS a t
r at r at e e l to to xD er
el
e
el
e upl cc er
a
er
a
pl
e ce
l
c c a c A el el cu Ac
f Ac f Ac M a x
Ac
c
Ac
c a a x
o o m f f M
tst tst he o o em
ns ns Ad tst tst h
Ku Ku ns ns Ad
Ku Ku
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 21
Electroless Nickel
Alkaline
Acidic
High/Mid/Low phosphorus (P- containing deposits)
Hot baths for WRC and cold baths for POP
05/20/2023
Electroless Nickel
There are lot of parameters that take part in E’less deposition which
influence
Deposition speed
Composition or physical properties of deposited layer
Stability of solution
Parameters are:
1. Temperature
2. pH
3. Concentration and ration of Ni/ Hypophosphite
4. Concentration of stabilizer
5. Concentration of complexing agents
6. Bath load
7. Bath age/ orthophosphate content
8. Agitation
05/20/2023
Comparison of Electroless Nickel
To start with, two types of Electroless Nickel 414 ABS and Electroless
601 KB were taken into consideration
Performance in terms of Nickel deposition as well as resistivity were
checked in accordance with 2 Activators namely Activator POP and
Activator Ultra G.
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 24
Comparison of Electroless Nickel
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 25
Comparison of Electroless Nickel- Resistivity
20/05/2023 Shivakumar C T 26
Trials at Customer site- M/s Exotech, Pune
4
Ni Conc. in g/L
3.5
3
Ni range 3-
2.5 3.5g/L
Plant Analysis
lab Analysis
2
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27
Number of Days
Trials at Customer site- M/s Exotech, Pune
35
Hypo Conc. in g/L
30
25
20
15 Plant Analysis
Lab Analysis
10
plant repeated Analysis
5
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27
Number Of Days
orthophosphite
160
140
120
Orthophosphite in g/L
100
80
60
40
20
orthophosphite
0
5/15/2019 7/4/2019 8/23/2019 10/12/2019 12/1/2019 1/20/2020 3/10/2020 4/29/2020 6/18/2020 8/7/2020
05/20/2023 Shivakumar C T
Trials at Customer site- M/s Exotech, Pune
Outcome of trials:-
05/20/2023 Shivakumar C T
Pilot Plant- Chembur
05/20/2023 Shivakumar C T
Our Next Move……
Triumph
Converting
opportunities
into business
Understanding
and meeting
their needs
Identify new
Customer’s
05/20/2023 Shivakumar C T
NAMASTE
THANK
YOU.
05/20/2023