Onsumer Protection at The Bottom of The Pyramid (BOP) : Striking The Right Balance Between Access, Protection and Innovation
Onsumer Protection at The Bottom of The Pyramid (BOP) : Striking The Right Balance Between Access, Protection and Innovation
Onsumer Protection at The Bottom of The Pyramid (BOP) : Striking The Right Balance Between Access, Protection and Innovation
face specific risks >consumer protection policy and regulation should consider needs of different client segments 2. Different financial products also raise distinct risks > product-specific regulation may be appropriate 3. With the huge growth projected in branchless banking, specific channel risks need attention 4. A light-touch approach to regulation can permit evolution of standards as risks evolve -- enabling regulators to encourage innovation, access and protection
demand side clients tend to have lower . . . Income and assets Levels of literacy, education and financial capability Experience with formal providers and products
The supply side BOP providers Typically, the poor rely more on non-bank providers, use a more limited product range (each with distinct
protection concerns) payments, credit, deposit, insurance and are likely to depend more on branchless banking models for future access
from a relative working overseas Opening her first basic banking account Shopping around for a business loan Going into a community retailer to send money to his mother in the village Deciding whether to permit her MFI to report payment info to the credit bureau Receiving his social payment (pension, child allowance, etc.) via a card linked to an account
Agent
Customer
~3bn
~25m
~1m
250k
Western Union
500k
Bank branches
600k
Mobile Phones
Post Offcs
ATMs
POS
currently unserved, by driving down costs Typical models use mobile phones, cards, and/or POS devices Alliances between Mobile Network Operators and financial institutions common Partnerships with non-bank agents (e.g., neighborhood shops, airtime dealers, even lottery outlets) also often in the mix to reduce costs and reach lower-end and more remote clients
financial services are delivered Use of non-bank agents introduces additional issues of service quality, error resolution, fraud and abuse Use of technology (mobile phone, cards, POS devices, biometric) including potentially much larger data footprint and wider data access Note, however, that branchless models also can offer some consumer protection advantages over conventional delivery (real-time info, traceability for errors/disputes) trust through technology
bundling, agent corruption Service quality, incl. agent training, consistent availability of cash-in/cash-out services Complaints and error resolution Who is responsible? What is the process? ADR vs. courts? Data quality, privacy and security Note: some financial services raise more consumer protection issues than others, e.g., deposits, credit
malevolently
Fraudster manages to electronically intercept the clients PIN Client is robbed inside agents store The agents store is robbed and the cash is stolen Client makes a deposit, and value credited to his account is less than
what he paid in and also less than what is shown on the receipt
Using P2P transfer capability on mobile phone, the client sends money
goes to withdraw
Fraudulent agent is set up
1. Prudential and market conduct regulation, e.g., Agent licensing/training/monitoring outsourcing rules Disclosure requirements plain language -agent/bank relationship, pricing, product terms Prohibited products (e.g. credit) and/or practices (e.g., steering, cross-selling, unauthorized data sharing) Required practices, e.g., standard contracts or provisions
Recourse/redress mechanisms Market-based mechanisms (e.g., quality seal, satisfaction index, publish data)
5.
6.
Note that regulators may need to define the rules of the game for these tools
ability to enforce
Need to leave space for market innovation and
experimentation
Balance protection and access policy goals