SM (1 To 4)
SM (1 To 4)
SM (1 To 4)
Chapter 1
Introduction to
Strategic Management
EVOLUTION OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
Glueck :
“A stream of decisions and actions which leads to the development of an
effective strategy or strategies to help achieve corporate objectives”.
Irreversible
1.Corporate Level Strategy: deals with aligning the resource deployments across a diverse set of
business areas, related or unrelated. Strategy formulation at this level involves integrating and
managing the diverse businesses and realizing synergy at the corporate level.
For example, your firm may have four distinct lines of business operations, namely, automobiles,
steel, tea, and telecom. The corporate level strategy will outline whether the organization should
compete in or withdraw from each of these lines of businesses, and in which business unit,
investments should be increased, in line with the vision of your firm.
For example, your firm may choose overall cost leadership as a strategy to be pursued in its steel business,
differentiation in its tea business, and focus in its automobile business. For e.g. Porsche markets to the
particular segment that likes fast and expensive cars and can afford it.
The business level strategies are decided upon by the heads of strategic business units and their teams in
light of the specific nature of the industry in which they operate.
For example, the marketing strategy for a tea business which is following the differentiation strategy may
translate into launching and selling a wide variety of tea variants through company-owned retail outlets.
This may result in the distribution objective of opening 25 retail outlets in a city; and producing 15 varieties
of tea may be the objective for the production department. The realization of the functional strategies in
the form of quantifiable and measurable objectives will result in the achievement of business level
strategies as well.
MODULE 3
SWOT Analysis evolved during the 1960s at Stanford Research Institute, is a very
popular strategic planning technique having applications in many areas of
management.
is one that capitalises on the opportunities through the use of strengths and
PROBLEM CHILD
On the x - axis
Relative Market Share = SBU Sales this year versus leading competitors sales this year.
(SBU market share / leading competitor’s market share)
On the y - axis
Market Growth Rate = Industry sales this year - Industry Sales last year.
BCG matrix and its strategic focus
Limitations of BCG Matrix
BCG matrix orders organizations as low and high, however by and large organizations can be
medium moreover. Along these lines, the genuine idea of business may not be reflected.
High market share does not generally prompt high benefits. There are high expenses additionally
included high market share.
Growth rate and relative market share are not by any mean the only markers of benefit. This
model disregards and neglects different markers of profitability.
The Y axis represents the annual market growth which fails to see the full picture that goes
beyond a one year span
At times, dogs may enable different organizations in increasingly aggressive to advantage. They
can gain considerably more than cash cows.
• This is similar to the way that business units or products are displayed on the
BCG matrix. However, the GE/McKinsey matrix also shows the market share
for the business unit or product as a segment of the circle and also indicates
the future trends for market attractiveness and business strength values via
an arrow that shows the future direction of the trend.
This matrix illustrates a product ('A') in a reasonably sized market with a market share of 21%. The market has medium attractiveness and the competitive
strength of the product is slightly below average. The future trends indicate that the market attractiveness will not change over the timescale under
consideration (two years in this case), but that the product will become more competitive in the market over this time frame. (Note that some of this was due to
planned changes in the product, but some of it was due to anticipated changes in other criteria such as brand reputation). As a point of comparison, Product A
would have been positioned in the "Cash Cow" quadrant of the BCG matrix.
The above matrix shows two more products ('B' and 'C') that have been added to the original matrix. Product B is addressing a smaller but rapidly growing
market and one where the company has a competitive edge. Product B would likely be displayed as a 'Star' in the BCG matrix.
Product C, on the other hand, has a negative outlook on its future. Its competitive strength is declining as indicated by the arrow pointing to the right. In reality,
Product C was a legacy product and was losing market share to the next generation of products in the market (one of these being Product A). This explains the
different trajectories in terms of competitiveness in the market (one declining, the other still getting better). They are in the same market segment, to the market
attractiveness scores are identical (as this is independent of the actual product). Note that Product C would have been positioned in the "Dogs" quadrant of the
BCG matrix.
Strategies To Be Adopted As Per The GE 9 Cell Matrix
•Strategy: Organization's plan for building and
maintaining a competitive advantage over its
competitors.
•Structure: How your company is organized
(that is, how departments and teams are
structured, including who reports to whom).
•Systems: The daily activities and procedures
that staff use to get the job done.
•Shared values: These are the core values of
the organization, as shown in its corporate
culture and general work ethic. They were
called "superordinate goals" when the model
was first developed.
•Style: The style of leadership adopted.
•Staff: The employees and their general
capabilities.
•Skills: The actual skills and competencies of
The model states that the seven elements need to balance and reinforce the organization's employees.
each other for an organization to perform well.