Cross Cultural Research Methods

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 36

CROSS – CULTURAL RESEARCH

METHODS
TYPES OF CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH
• Method Validation Studies

Validity refers to whether or not a scale, test, or


measure accurately measures what it is supposed to
measure.

Reliability refers to whether it measures it


consistently. These concepts are extremely
important to all researchers, cross-cultural or not.
• Cross-cultural validation studies

- They examine whether a measure of a


psychological construct that was originally
generated in a single culture is applicable,
meaningful, and most importantly
psychometrically equivalent
• Indigenous Cultural Studies
These are characterized by rich descriptions of
complex theoretical models of culture that
predict and explain cultural differences.

Cross-Cultural Comparisons
• are studies that compare cultures on some
psychological variable of interest. Cross-cultural
comparisons serve as the backbone of
crosscultural research and are the most
prevalent type of cross-cultural study.
TYPES OF CROSS-CULTURAL
COMPARISONS
Exploratory vs. Hypothesis Testing

- Exploratory studies are designed to examine


the existence of cross-cultural similarities and
differences.

- Hypothesis-testing studies are designed to


examine why cultural differences may exist.
- Presence or Absence of Contextual Factors

• Contextual factors may involve characteristics of


the participants (such as socioeconomic status,
education, and age) or their cultures (such as
economic development and religious institutions).
• Structure vs. Level Oriented

Structure - involve comparisons of constructs


(e.g., is depression conceptualized in the same
way across cultures?), their structures (can
depression be assessed by the same constituent
elements in different cultures?), or their
relationships with other constructs (do
depression and anxiety have the same
relationship in all countries?).
• Level oriented - involve the comparisons of
scores (do individuals from different cultures
show the same level of depression?).

• Structure-oriented studies focus on relationships


among variables and attempt to identify
similarities and differences in these relations
across cultures. Level-oriented studies ask
whether people of different cultures have
different mean levels of different variables.
• Individual vs. Ecological (Cultural) Level

Individual-level studies are the typical type


of study in psychology, in which individual
participants provide data and are the unit of
analysis.

• Ecological- or cultural-level studies use


countries or cultures as the unit of analysis.
Designs that Establish Linkages Between
Culture and Individual Mental Processes and
Behaviors
• Two types of linkage studies :

Unpackaging Studies
- are extensions of basic cross-cultural
comparisons, but include the measurement of a
variable (contextual factor) that assesses the
contents of culture that are thought to produce
the differences on the variable being compared
across cultures.
In unpackaging studies, “culture” as an
unspecified variable is replaced by more
specific variables in order to truly explain
cultural differences. These variables are called
context variables, and should be measured to
examine the degree to which they can
account for cultural differences.
• Individual-Level Measures of Culture
- are measures that assess a variable on the
individual level that is thought to be a product of
culture.

Self-Construal Scales

- scales measuring independence and


interdependence on the individual level
• Experiments

- are studies in which researchers create


conditions to establish cause-effect relationships.
Participants are generally assigned randomly to
participate in the conditions, and researchers
then compare results across conditions.
Different types of experiments conducted in
Cross-cultural Psychology
• Priming Studies

- are those that involve experimentally


manipulating the mindsets of participants
and measuring the resulting changes in
behavior.
• Behavioral Studies

-  studies that facilitate in understanding


why we behave the way we do and they
are concerned with discovering patterns
in our actions.
BIAS AND EQUIVALENCE

Bias - refers to differences that do not have


exactly the same meaning within and across
cultures.

Equivalence - is a state or condition of similarity


in conceptual meaning and empirical method
between cultures that allows comparisons to be
meaningful.
Five major areas of Bias
1. Conceptual Bias
-  explain distortion differences between hand
and objects in localization tasks.

2. Method Bias
- Sampling Bias – refers to whether cross-cultural
samples can be compared.
• Linguistic Bias – refers to whether the research
protocols—items on questionnaires, instructions,
etc.—used in a cross-cultural study are
semantically equivalent across the various
included in the study.

• Procedural Bias - the issue of bias and


equivalence also applies to the procedures used
to collect data in different cultures
• Measurement Bias

refers to the degree to which measures used to


collect data in different cultures are equally
valid and reliable. As mentioned above, validity
refers to whether a measure accurately
measures what it is supposed to measure;
reliability refers to how consistently a measure
measures what it is supposed to measure
Response Bias
- is a systematic tendency to respond in a certain
way to items or scales.

Different Types of Response Bias

Socially desirable responding


- is the tendency to give answers that make
oneself look good
• Acquiescence bias - the tendency to agree rather
than disagree with items on questionnaires

• Extreme response bias- the tendency to use the


ends of a scale regardless of item content

• Reference group effect - This idea is based on the


notion that people implicit social comparisons
with others when making ratings on scales, rather
than relying on direct inferences about a private,
personal value system
• Interpretational Bias

• Analyzing Data. In testing cultural differences on


target variables of interest, researchers often use
inferential statistics such as chi-square or
analysis of variance (ANOVA) and engage in what
is known as null hypothesis significance testing
Dealing with Nonequivalent Data

• Four different ways in which the problem of


nonequivalence of cross-cultural data can be
handled

1. Preclude comparison. The most conservative


thing a researcher could do is not make the
comparison in the first place, concluding that it
would be meaningless.
2. Reduce the nonequivalence in the data. Many
researchers take steps to identify equivalent and
nonequivalent parts of their methods and then
refocus their comparisons solely on the
equivalent parts.

3. Interpret the nonequivalence. A third strategy is


for the researcher to interpret the
nonequivalence as an important piece of
information concerning cultural differences.
4. Ignore the nonequivalence. Unfortunately,
what many cross-cultural researchers end up
doing is simply ignoring the problem, clinging to
beliefs concerning scale invariance across
cultures despite a lack of evidence to support
those beliefs.
ENCULTURATION
• Enculturation is the process by which
people learn the dynamics of their
surrounding culture and acquire values
and norms appropriate or necessary to
that culture and its worldviews. As part of
this process, the influences that limit,
direct, or shape the individual include
parents, other adults, and peers
• “Cultural learning “
- learning not only from others but through
others

Socialization
• - is the process by which we learn and
internalize the rules and patterns of the society in
which we live. This process, which occurs over a
long time, involves learning and mastering
societal norms, attitudes, values, and belief
systems. The process of socialization starts early,
from the very first day of life.
Socialization generally refers to the actual
process and mechanisms by which people learn
the rules of society—what is said to whom and
in which contexts.

Enculturation generally refers to the products of


the socialization process—the subjective,
underlying, psychological aspects of culture that
become internalized through development.
BRONFENBRENNER’S ECOLOGICAL
THEORY
• The ecological theory
developed by Urie
Bronfenbrenner (1917–
2005) primarily focuses
on the social contexts in
which children live and
the people who influence
their development.
Five Environmental Systems
• Bronfenbrenner’s (1995,
Bronfenbrenner & Morris,
2006) ecological theory
consists of five environmental
systems that range from close
interpersonal interactions to
broad-based influences of
culture. The five systems are
the microsystem, mesosystem,
exosystem, macrosystem, and
chronosystem
• A microsystem is a setting in
which the individual spends
considerable time, such as the
student’s family, peers, school,
and neighborhood. Within these
microsystems, the individual has
direct interactions with parents,
teachers, peers, and others. For
Bronfenbrenner, the student is
not a passive recipient of
experiences but is someone who
reciprocally interacts with others
and helps to construct the
microsystem.
• The mesosystem
involves linkages
between
microsystems.
Examples are the
connections between
family experiences and
school experiences
and between family
and peers
• The exosystem is at
work when experiences
in another setting (in
which the student does
not have an active role)
influence what
students and teachers
experience in the
immediate context.
• The macrosystem is the larger
culture as a whole and includes
socioeconomic status, wealth,
poverty, and ethnicity. This
further includes children, their
parents and school, and their
parent's workplace as part of a
larger cultural context.

You might also like