Article 13 of the Indian Constitution deals with laws inconsistent with fundamental rights. It states that all pre-existing laws that are inconsistent with fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution will be void. It also says that no future law can limit or take away the fundamental rights granted by the Constitution, and any such law will be void. Article 13(3) broadly defines "law" to include ordinances, orders, bye-laws, rules and regulations that have the force of law in India. It also considers pre-existing laws that were not repealed before the Constitution as "laws in force". Article 13(4) clarifies that Article 13 does not apply to amendments to the Constitution made under Article 368.
Article 13 of the Indian Constitution deals with laws inconsistent with fundamental rights. It states that all pre-existing laws that are inconsistent with fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution will be void. It also says that no future law can limit or take away the fundamental rights granted by the Constitution, and any such law will be void. Article 13(3) broadly defines "law" to include ordinances, orders, bye-laws, rules and regulations that have the force of law in India. It also considers pre-existing laws that were not repealed before the Constitution as "laws in force". Article 13(4) clarifies that Article 13 does not apply to amendments to the Constitution made under Article 368.
Article 13 of the Indian Constitution deals with laws inconsistent with fundamental rights. It states that all pre-existing laws that are inconsistent with fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution will be void. It also says that no future law can limit or take away the fundamental rights granted by the Constitution, and any such law will be void. Article 13(3) broadly defines "law" to include ordinances, orders, bye-laws, rules and regulations that have the force of law in India. It also considers pre-existing laws that were not repealed before the Constitution as "laws in force". Article 13(4) clarifies that Article 13 does not apply to amendments to the Constitution made under Article 368.
Article 13 of the Indian Constitution deals with laws inconsistent with fundamental rights. It states that all pre-existing laws that are inconsistent with fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution will be void. It also says that no future law can limit or take away the fundamental rights granted by the Constitution, and any such law will be void. Article 13(3) broadly defines "law" to include ordinances, orders, bye-laws, rules and regulations that have the force of law in India. It also considers pre-existing laws that were not repealed before the Constitution as "laws in force". Article 13(4) clarifies that Article 13 does not apply to amendments to the Constitution made under Article 368.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6
Article 13
• Acts of state- regulated by Const.- so that state- not abuse powers
given by Const. • Article-13- Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights: (1) All laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void (2) The State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void A.13(3)- in this article, unless the context otherwise requires law includes any Ordinance, order, bye law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law; laws in force includes laws passed or made by Legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas
Not only legislation but above can be challenged in courts
– for violating FRs Terms explained given in A. 13(3)(a)
• Ordinance- issued by President/Governor-
when Parliament/State Legislation not in session. • Act- Ordinance approved- becomes an act. • Order/Decree- Passed by Court/judge. • Bye Laws- rules by local auth for management/ regulation of affairs. Difference between Rules & Regulation Rules Regulation • Set of instructions- tell us • Rules- authorized by way things are to be legislation. done. • Given under the Act. • Made- conditions & • Set by Government. circumstances. • Legal binding. • Set- individual/ organization. • Ex- Law prevents • No legal binding. alcohol from being sold in certain places. • Ex- Traffic Rules A. 13(3)(b) • “Laws in force”- laws in force includes laws passed or made by Legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed. • Ex- Indian Contract Act, 1872 • Evidence Act • The Transfer of property Act,1885 • Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 A. 13(4)- Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368 Right of Equality
• Const. can be amended by special majority.
• Any amendment made in A. 368- constitution- not challenged under A.13. • Amendment- against FRs- no challenge. • A. 13 – legislative law as opposed to Constituent law.