This document discusses various methods for collecting data in research studies, including self-report methods like interviews and questionnaires, direct observation using checklists, and biophysiological measures. It provides details on different types of interviews and questionnaires and their advantages. Observation involves directly watching behaviors and recording them. Biophysiological tools measure variables like blood pressure. The document also covers key concepts in research rigor like reliability, validity, credibility, and dependability.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
95 views
Data Collection Methods and Tools
This document discusses various methods for collecting data in research studies, including self-report methods like interviews and questionnaires, direct observation using checklists, and biophysiological measures. It provides details on different types of interviews and questionnaires and their advantages. Observation involves directly watching behaviors and recording them. Biophysiological tools measure variables like blood pressure. The document also covers key concepts in research rigor like reliability, validity, credibility, and dependability.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 32
DATA COLLECTION
METHODS AND TOOLS.
Presented by; NAMASOPO EMILLY THEOLA KANYESIGYE EMILLY MAYANJA EDRINE ISAAC DATA Data is a representation of facts or ideas in a formalized manner capable of being communicated or manipulated by some process. Types of data • Primary data and secondary data. • Primary data is the original data collected specifically by the researcher for the study • Secondary data is that which has been gathered by others. sources include hospital records, patient charts, care plan statements etc. DATA COLLECTION METHODS These are grouped into three • Self report • Direct observation • Bio physiological measures. SELF REPORT • These are participants’ responses to questions posed by the researcher. Types of self reports • interviews • Questionnaires. INTERVIEWS • These involves a conversation between the researcher and the participant in which the researcher asks questions about the study topic. Tool used is an interview guide • Unstructured interviews; the researcher proceeds with out a preconceived view or flow of information to be gathered. Researchers ask broad grand tour question Interviews • Semi structured; researcher has a list of topics or broad questions that must be addressed in an interview,( topic guide) • Focused group interviews; a group of 4 or more people is assembled for a discussion. The interviewer guides the discussion according to the topic to be covered. • Joint interviews; for a phenomena which involves a relationship between two or three people. E.g. grief that mothers and fathers experience after loosing a child. • Life histories. Are narrative self disclosures about individual real life experiences. Individuals are asked to describe, often in chronological sequence , their experiences either orally or in writing. • Personal diaries. Participants are asked to maintain a dairy or journal over a specified period • Critical incident technique; gathers information about peoples behavior in specific circumstances. It focuses on a factual incident which has had an impact on the person. • Think aloud method; it has been used to collect data about cognitive processes such as thinking, problem solving and decision making. QUESTIONNAIRE METHOD • Involves use of a structured instrument that the participant fills. The tool is a questionnaire Question forms • Open ended qns; allows participants to respond to questions in their own words. • Closed ended questions; response alternatives are prespecified by the researcher. The alternatives range from simple yes or no to complex expression of open ended opinions. Advantages of questionnaires • Less costly than interviews • They offer possibility of anonymity unlike interviews • No interviewer bias since there is no interviewer Interviews vs. questionnaire( In favor of interviews) • Response rates are high in interviews. participants can’t refuse to talk to interviewer but can ignore questionnaire. • Good audience. Interviews cater for children, the elderly, and the illiterate who can’t fill the questionnaire. • Clarity. Interviews offer some protection against ambiguous or confusing questions. • Depth of questioning. Questionnaires deliver superficial response. Also open ended questions are avoided in questionnaires because most people hate writing long responses. • Respondents are less likely to give ‘don’t know’ responses or leave unanswered qns • Supplementary data is got through observation during interviews • Sample control, interviewers know whether the people interviewed are the intended respondents. Questionnaires can be passed to a friend or relative. • Interviewer controls questions . In questionnaires respondents can jump to another question in another section leading to bias. OBSERVATION • Data is acquired through direct observation of behavior, event related to topic under study. observation checklist is used observation Techniques • Participant observation. Participant observer takes part in the functioning of group under study and records information within the context and experiences that are relevant to participants. Important dimensions of observation • Focus of the observation; it can be on broadly defined e.g. specific behavior. • Concealment; the researcher doesn’t tell people that they are being observed. • Duration; some observations are made in a short time and others in a long period of time. • Method of recording the observation; by human senses then written using pen and paper. observation • Relevant information collected include; physical setting, participants, activities, frequency and duration of study, process of the activity and outcomes of the activity. • The tool used is the observational checklist. • However its bound to observer biases. Bio physiologic measures • Bio physiologic instruments are used both for creating independent variables ( e.g. intervention using biofeedback equipment) and for measuring dependent variables Purposes of bio physiologic measures • To study basic bio physiologic processes. • Explore ways in which nursing actions and interventions affect physiologic outcomes. • Studies of the correlates of physiologic functioning in patients with health problems. Types of bio physiologic measures • In vivo measures; performed directly within or on living organisms e.g. measuring blood pressure, temperature. • In vitro measures; are gathered from participants by extracting bio physiologic material from them and subjecting it to analysis by specialized laboratory techniques. Advantages of bio physiologic measures • Relatively accurate and precise, especially when compared to psychological measures e.g. self report on anxiety. • Objective; Two nurses can get same information when using the same equipment. • Instruments provide valid measures of targeted variables. Summary of data collection tools. • Observational checklists • Questionnaires • Interview guide Rigors of research (measure of trustworthiness) In quantitative research, • Reliability • Accuracy and consistency of information obtained in a study.it is mostly associated with methods used to measure research findings e.g. thermometer .statistical reliability that the same results would be obtained with completely new sample of subjects. • Validity • Concerns with the study of evidence that is whether the findings are cogent,convicing and well grounded.it assesses the methods of measuring variables. The validity question is whether there's evidence to support the assertion that methods are really measuring the abstract concepts that they purport to measure.it also concerns the quality of the researchers evidence regarding effect of independent variable on dependent variable. General measures of trustworthiness • According to GUBA’s model • They include; Truth value Applicability Consistency Neutrality Rigors • Truth value • Asks whether the researcher is confident or has established confident in the truth of the findings for the subject of informants and the context in which the study was conducted. • In qualitative research, it is assessed by how well threats to internal validity of of the study has been managed as well as the instruments as well as the measure of the phenomenon under study. Rigors • In qualitative • Assessed from the discovery of human experiences as they are lived and perceived by informants. Truth value is subject oriented not defined by a priori by the researcher. Its termed as credibility. Credibility can be accomplished with prolonged engagement with people., continual observation in the field ,the utilization of peer debriefs or peer researchers ,negative case analysis ,researcher flexibility and participant checks ,validation or coanalysis. Rigors • Applicability • The degree to which the findings can apply to other contexts and settings or with other groups.it is the capacity to generalize from the findings to greater populations. • He also introduced the next perspective on applicability in in equal research by referring to fattiness or transferability. • Transferability means the level to which the audience has the ability to generalize the results of a research to her/his own context . Rigors • Consistency • Means whether the conclusions would be consistent if the inquiry were repeated with the same subject matter or in a similar context. Its defined in terms of dependability in qualitative research. • Dependability relates to the primary challenge that the way in which research is carried out needs to be consistent across researchers and analysis technique. Rigors • Neutrality • The degree to which the results are a function solely of the informants and conditions of the research and not of their biases ,motivation and views. He suggested that confimability is the criterion for neutrality in qualitative research. • Confimability deals with the main issue that findings should signify as far as possible the specific situation being investigated as opposed to beliefs, pet theories or biases of the researcher. Rigors • It is according to the perspective that the integrity of results is based on the data that the investigator most properly tie together the data, analytical processes and findings that the reader is in position to confirm the adequacy of the findings. references • Essentials of Nursing Research 7th edition , Denise F. Polit, Cheryl Tatano Beck • Nursing Research and Methods 7th edition , Denise F. Polit, Cheryl Tatano Beck