PR 1 q3 Group 2 11 Trustworthy
PR 1 q3 Group 2 11 Trustworthy
PR 1 q3 Group 2 11 Trustworthy
Group 2
LESSON 2 : IMPORTANCE OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
ACROSS DIFFERENT FIELDS
INTRODUCTION
—As earlier mentioned in this lesson, qualitative research can shed
the best light on a certain phenomena; it can likewise offer the best
answer to research inquiries across fields or discipline.
• The researcher attempts to capture data on the perceptions of local actors "From
the inside ,through a process of deep attentiveness of empathic understanding and
of suspending or "bracketing "preconceptions about topics under discussion (Miles
and Huberman , 1994 as cited in Shawn and holland 2014).
• The researcher is essentially the main instrument in the study rather than
standardized data collection devices . it is here that the word " "reflexive" often
occurs - referring to the central part played by the subjectivity of the word
"reflexive often occurs -referring to the central part played by the subjectivity of
the researcher and those being studied (Eisner. 1999 as cited in Shawn and holland
2014
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN MARKETING
Qualitative research in marketing has a long history, Influenced by social
research, marketing researchers embedded projective devices within the
approach of in-depth interview.
They created devices such as matching people , animals ,cars ,pictorial
symbols and soliciting dreams. They accumulated case studies ,personal histories
and ethnographies ,and conducted group interviews even before they were called
“focus group”.
Glick and Belk did the first qualitative study in 1962 for the Coca-Cola
Company on why people drink soft drinks , as well as first study for AT & T on
the meaning of the telephone. For the Wriggley Company ,they did a research on
what baseball meant to Cuba fans. A study for FTD ,the flower delivery
system ,analyzed the poignancy of flowers in representing the life cycle ,
symbolizing its beauty , fragility and the inevitability of death.
The more modern qualitative marketing studies use the
grounded theory approach.For example , Flint , Woodruff and
Guardial (2002 ,as cited in Belk ,2006 ) posed in their
qualitative study the following research question : What does
desired value change mean to customer ?'''
Much exploratory research has been done to fulfill AEC's goal of having only one
currency , as in the european Unions euro ( http:...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association
of Southeast Asian Nations_Roadmap for Asean_financial_integration ).
Business all over the world use other methods like participant observation ,
content analysis focus groups , narrative interviews and “hidden" methods such as
archival research (Marchan,Pekkari & Welch,2004).
EVALUATION OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Now the big question comes. How does one evaluate qualitative research?
Experts agree on one answer : Triangulation, which is a good guide ,if not to
convincingtheory ,then ,at least to the rigorous verificition of data (Osland
and Osaland,2001).Triangulation is a term mainly used to refer to the
concurrent use of both qualitative and quantitative data
(Mcdonald,1985).Usenier (1998) contents that qualitative and quantitative
research are ‘complementary’ rather than ‘competing' traditions.and should
be merged in the search for meaning as differences in nature and differences
in degree.