0% found this document useful (0 votes)
98 views61 pages

Chapter 4 Organizing

Uploaded by

MOSTAKIN ROY
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
98 views61 pages

Chapter 4 Organizing

Uploaded by

MOSTAKIN ROY
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 61

Faculty of Business, Hospitality,

Accounting & Finance

Principles of Management
MGT 1023

If its important to you, you will find a way. If its not, you’ll find an excuse.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-1
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 1 1
Chapter 4

Organizing

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-2


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 2 2
Organising
What is organizing?
- “organizing in a general sense means
systematic arrangment of activities”
- Organizing follows “planning”

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-3


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 3 3
Definition
ALLEN defines

“Organizing “ is the process of identifying


and grouping the work to be performed
defining and delegating responsibility and
authority and establishing relationship for the
purposeof enabling people to work most
effectively together in accomplishing
objectives”.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-4


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 43 4
THEO HAIMANN

“ Organising is the process


of defining and grouping the
activities of the entire
process and establishing
the authority and
relationship
among them”
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-5
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 5 5
ORGANISING IN MANAGEMENT

Organising in
management refers to
the relationship
between people,work and
resources used to
achieve the common
objectives
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-6
6
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 6
O R G AN I Z AT I O N STRUCTURE

A Design of Organization
Movement or Blueprint,

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-7


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 7 7
DEFINITION

ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
EXPLAINS THE POSITION
AND OFFICIAL
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
VARIOUS INDIVIDUALS IN
THE ORGANIZATION.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-8
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 8 8
ORGANISATION CHART

It is a diagrammatic
representation of
organization
structure
show names designation
functions of personnel in
a organization.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright by Ms Syikin@
1-9
9 9
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-10
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 10 10
NATURE OF ORGANISING
Learning objectives
Identifying the task
Grouping the activities
Delegation of authority
Coordination

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-11


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 11 11
PURPOSE O F O R G AN I S I N G
Aids to management
It facilitates
growth,creativity It ensures
optimum use
resources
Establishes relationship
among individual groups
Clusters job into
units Coordinates.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright by Ms Syikin@
1-12
12 12
F O R M AL AN D I N F O R M AL GROUPS

FORMAL GROUP- A
formal group is a
structured
group,which has a plan
and
positions each job’s
objective and functions
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-13
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 13 13
CHARACTERISTICS OF FORMAL GROUP

Formal means
something systematic.
It is in an official
structure
Itprovidesofficial
relationship between
individual.
It is objective oriented
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-14
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 14 14
ADVANTAGES:

The line of communication is


very clear
It is accuracy of the information.
systematic
It is objective oriented.
It has a heirarchial pattern

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-15


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 15 15
I N F O R M AL GROUPS
It is the outcome of personal
,social and friendly relationship
and it
develops spontaneously .
It arises naturally on the basis of
friendship or some common
ot be
interest whichmay or related may n
with work
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-16
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 16 16
DEFINITION

According to Chester
Bernard “informal
organisation is
joint personal activity with
our conscious common
purpose though contributing
to common purpose”
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-17
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 17 17
Characteristics of Informal Group
• Created by the member of the
organization for their social and
psychological satisfaction
• Informal groups are not stable
and permanent
• Greater in number compared to
formal groups, free interaction

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-18


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 18 18
It is concisiously deliberate in It arises
nature spontaneously
It is based on delegation of It arises on account of social
authority interaction or it arises from account of
personal factors like friendship

Rules responsibilities are written Just unwritten rules and


and clearly defined regulations

It shown in organization It has no place in organization


chart chart
It provides a definite It is structure less because it is
structure social
Formal authority is attaches to a Informal authority attaches to a
position person out of social interactions

It flows downwards ( top to lower It flows


level) upwards
It is permanent and It is temporaryand
stable unstable
It is deliberately
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice It is
Hall 1-19
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 19 19
TYPES OF
ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURE
LINE STRUCTURE
LINE AND STAFF
STRUCTURE FUNCTIONAL
STRUCTURE
COMMITTEE
STRUCTURE PROJECT
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-20
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 20 20
LINE STRUCTURE
It flows from top to lower level .
It is the simplest and
oldest method followed
in many
organization.
It is also called as
military organization.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-21
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 21 21
GENRAL MANAGER

PRODUCTION MANAGER

ASSISTANT

MANAGER

SUPERVISORS
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-22
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 22 22
MERITS O F LI N E
STRUCTURE
Simple and easy to establish.
Authority and responsibility is
clearly defined
Prompts decision.
Speedy action taken.
Unity of command since each will
have full control over subordinates.
Ensures Better discipline.
It is very economical since it is
less elaborate.
It provides better scope
for
Copyright © 2011 supervision.
Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-23
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 23 23
DEMERITS OF LINE
STRUCTURE
Lacks specialization
Overburden with lots of administrative
work
It may result in autocratic control
Manager enjoys monopoly in the
matter of decision making ( he himself
take
decision)
Always downward communications
is possible
Lacks upward communication
It is suitable for small
concerns
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ employing
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall
few 1-24
24 24
LINE AND STAFF ORGANIZATION

The staff is attached to


line The staff are
experts
specialized in specific
areas
They give ideas to personnel
The staff supports the line
personnel
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-25
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 25 25
MERITS OF LI N E AN D STAFF

Relief to top
executives. Quality
decisions.
Flexible.
Specialization is not
violated.
Unity of command is
not violated.
Expert advice
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-26
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 26 26
DEMERITS OF LINE AND
STAFF

Often arises conflicts between


line and staff.
Leads to confusion since
responsibility is not well defined.
Ineffective staff .
Suitability ( in large organization).

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-27


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 27 27
FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION

There will be a separate


department for different
actions or activities.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-28


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 28 28
MERITS OF FUNCTIONAL
ORGANIZATION

S pe cia liz a tion is possible


Work load is less
Be tte r control ove r subordinates
S cope for e xpa nsion Higher
efficiency

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-29


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 29 29
DEMERITS

Unity of command is violated.


Interdepartmental conflicts.
Delay in decision making.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-30


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 30 30
COMMITTEE
ORGANIZATION
A group of persons entrustedin a
task
Types:
Standard or permanent
committee. Temporary committee.
or ad
hoc
Executive
committee. Advisory
committee.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright by Ms Syikin@
1-31
31 31
MERITS
Scope of group judgment .
Proper coordination and
control among individuals and
departments.
Motivation through participation
is possible.
Various interest groups.
Check against misuse of powers.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-32
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 32 32
DEMERITS

Expensive affair to constitute


a committee
Time consuming or slow
decision
Compromise
decision
Suppression of ideas
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-33
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 33 33
PROJECT ORGANIZATION
It varies from one organization to
organization.
Any organization execute a
large project for a long period of
time
adopt this project organization.
Usually some company have
large number of small projects.
Theterm leader organize the
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-34
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 34 34
MERITS

Maximum use of specialized


knowledge and skills.
Unity of command exist in this
organization
Flexibility of operation.
Fixation of individual responsibility
for results.
Focuses attention onthe
specific projects.
Provides better coordination.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-35
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 35 35
DEMERITS

Difficulty in decision making.


Pressure and uncertainty
due to some several specialist.
Difficulty in coordination.
Evaluation of performance
of various specialist is
difficult.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-36


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 36 36
MATRIX ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURE

It is suitable where there is


large number of small
projects.
It is also called as
multiple command system.
It is also called as linking
pins.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-37
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 373737
MERITS

BEST UTILISATION OF
ORGANIZATIONAL RESOURCES.
BENEFIT TO BOTH
FUNCTIONAL AND TECHNICAL
SPECIALIST .
IT PROMOTES
COMMUNICATION PERMITS
HIGHER DEGREE OF
FLEXIBLITY AND ADAPTABILITY.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright by Ms Syikin@
1-38
38 38
DEMERITS

•Its against principle of unity of


command.
•Quick decision may not be possible It
gives scope for conflicts.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-39


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 39 39
SPAN OF MANAGEMENT
It is also called
as span of
control or
span of
supervision.

It refers to
the number
of
subordinates that
Copyright by Ms Syikin@
report
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall
directly
1-40
to 40 40
TWO TYPES OF SPAN
NARROW SPAN OF MANAGEMENT
Tall organization.
Manager oversees “ few”
subordinates. better communication.
example : handicraft , ivory work ,
etc.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-41


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 41 41
WIDE SPAN OF MANAGEMENT
Flat organization .
Manager oversees “large” number of
subordinates.
Less overhead cost.
example: large firms .

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-42


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 42 42
narrow
wide span
span of
control ofcontrol

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-43


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 43 43
THEORY OF GRAICUNA’S

He was a
French
management
consultant.
He developed
a formula
for
analyzing
superior
subordinate
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright by Ms Syikin@
relationship.
1-44
44 44
THREE TYPES OF
RELATI ONSHI P
D ire ct re la tionship (superior
has direct link with subordinates).
Direct group relationship (arises
between manager and group of
subordinates ).

Grossrelationship ( relationship
among subordinates).

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-45


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 45 45
D I R E C T S I N G LE
REL ATIONSHIP

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-46


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 46 46
DIRECT GROUP
RELATIONSHIP

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-47


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 47 47
GROSS RELATIONSHIP

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-48


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 48 48
FACTORS DET ERMING SPAN OF
MANAGEMENT

Nature of work
Type of technology
Ability of the
manager
Capacity of subordinates
Degree of decentralization
Quality of planning
Staff assistant
Communication
techniques
Time available for
supervision Geographical
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-49
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ dispersion of 49 49
DEPARTMENTATION
It is a process of
grouping individual jobs
into
departmentation.

TYPES:
Departme nta tion by
function.
Departme nta tion
by products.
Departmentation

by
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-50
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 50 50
Departmentation by
FUNCTIONS
Deparmentation done by the functions.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-51


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 51 51
MERITS & DEMERITS
Provides scope of
specialization. Eliminates
cost of duplication of
work.
Effective control over performance.
Facilitates delegation of authority.

Interdepartmental conflicts.
Difficulty in coordination of activities.
Increases responsibility of departmental
heads.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-52
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 52 52
D E P AR T M E N T AT I O N BY PRODUCTS

It is suitable for different lines of products.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-53


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 53 53
MERITS &
DEMERITS
Reduces problem of coordination.
It leads to specialization.
Performance evaluation can be done
easily.
It is flexible and adaptable to
change .
Chance of duplication is more.
There may be underutilization of plant
capacity when the demand of product
is not adequate.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-54
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 54 54
T E R R I T O R I AL DEPARTMENTATION

activities are geographically spread


over.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-55


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 55 55
MERITS & DEMERITS
It helps in achieving benefits of
local operation.
Better coordination of activities.
Provides effective span of
control. Opportunity to train
managers.
Facilitates expansionof business
to various regions

Due to geographical distance problem


of communication.
Coordinationand control becomes
less effective.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-56
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 56 56
Departmentation By Customers
Each department will serve the
particular type or classof customers.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-57


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 57 57
MERITS &
DEMERITS
Offer scope of specialization.
Enterprise gain ultimate
knowledge about needs of
various categories of
customers.

Lead to duplication of
activities.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-58
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 58 58
DEPARTMENTATION BY PROCESS
OR EQUIPMENT
The activities are grouped according
to process or equipment.
It is generally used in
manufacturing industries.
Lead to specialization.
No confusion.
Properutilization of manpower
and machine engaged in
proper way.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-59


Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 59 59
TIME AND NUMBER
DEPARTMENTATION

TIME:
The activities or group on
basis of time
EXAMPLE: Call centers
or any factory.

NUMBER:
The activities or group
on
basis of performance by
certain
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. number
 Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-60of
60
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 60
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-61
Copyright by Ms Syikin@ 61 61

You might also like